Duše předmětu a tělo modlitby aneb zkoumání sociologických nejistot na případu Sóka Gakkai International
Bd.17,Nr.2(2020)
Teorie aktér-sítí v českých sociálních a humanitních vědách
This case study presents the results of long-term original ethnographic research on the international Buddhist organization Soka Gakkai International (SGI). It focuses on the relationship between the material and immaterial and deals with the question of how to study them in the sociology of religion. The analysis builds upon the critique of the modernist paradigm and related research of religion in the social sciences as presented by Harman, Law and Latour. The methodology draws on the approach of Actor-Network Theory as presented by Bruno Latour, and pursues object-oriented ethnography, for the sake of which the concept of iconoclash is borrowed. This approach is applied to the research which focused on the key counterparts in the Buddhist praxis of SGI ‒ the phrase daimoku and the scroll called Gohonzon. The analysis deals mainly with the sources of sociological uncertainties related to the agency of the scroll. It looks at the processes concerning the establishing and dissolving of connections among involved elements, it opens up the black-boxes and proposes answers to the question of new conceptions of the physical as seen through Gohonzon.
Actor-Network Theory; daimoku; Gohonzon; iconoclash; sociology of religion; Soka Gakkai International.
„Activities for Peace.“ SGI, n.d. Cit. 30. září 2015 (http://www.sgi.org/about-us/activities-for-peace.html).
BARONE, Carlo. 2007. „A Neo-Durkheimian Analysis of a New Religious Movement.“ Theory and Society 36(2): 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9023-3
BELL, Jeffrey. 2010. „Latour on Factishes and Belief.“ Cit. 21. září 2017 (https://schizosoph.wordpress.com/2010/07/20/latour-on-factishes-and-belief/).
CHILSON, Clark. 2014. „Cultivating Charisma: Ikeda Daisakuʼs Self Presentations and Transformational Leadership.“ Journal of Global Buddhism 15: 65–78.
CLARKE. Peter B. (ed.). 2000. Japanese New Religions in Global Perspective. Richmond: Curzon.
CLARKE, Peter B. a Jeffrey SOMERS (eds.). 1944. Japanese New Religions in the West. London: Routledge.
„Co je Sóka Gakkai?“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2015 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/soka_gakkai/co_je_soka_gakkai.html).
„Daisaku Ikeda. SGI President.“ SGI, n.d. Cit. 30. září 2015 (http://www.sgi-usa.org/newsand events/newsroom/mediakit/ikedaprofile.php).
DOBELLAERE, Karl. 2001. Soka Gakkai: From Lay Movement to Religion. Salt Lake City: Signature Books.
ESPIRITO SANTO, Diana a Nico TASSI (eds.). 2013. Making Spirit: Materiality and Transcendence in Contemporary Religions. New York: I.B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755625758
„FAQ.“ Soka spirit, n.d. Cit 21. března 2018 (http://www.sokaspirit.com/original/nichikan-gohonzon/faq.html).
FENN, Richard. K. 2001. „Editorial Commentary: Religion and the Secular; The Sacred and the Profane: The Scope of the Argument.“ Pp. 3–22 in Richard K. FENN (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
FUJDA, Milan. 2013. „Proč nestudovat náboženství: K sociologickému uspořádávání skutečnosti.“ Sociální studia 10(3): 13–43. https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2013-3-13
FUJDA, Milan. 2015. „What Would an Informant Tell Me after Reading My Paper? On the Theoretical Significance of Ethical Commitment and Political Transparency in Symmetrical Practice Studying Religion(s).“ Religio: revue pro religionistiku 23(1): 57–86.
FUJDA, Milan. 2016. „From Religion to Ordering Uncertainity: A Lesson from Dancers.“ Pp. 189–206 in Ingman PEIK, Utriainen TERHI, Hovi, TUIJA a Broo MANS (eds.). The Relational Dynamics of Enchantment and Sacralization: Changing the Terms of the Religion Versus Secularity Debate, Sheffield: The Study of Religion in a Global Context.
„Gohonzon.“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2015 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/praktikovani_buddhismu/gohonzon.html).
HAMMOND, Philip E. a David W. MACHACEK. 2004. Soka Gakkai in America. Oxford: University Oxford Press.
HARMAN, Graham. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
HOCHSWENDER Woody, Greg Martin a Ted MORINO. 2017. Buddha ve tvém zrcadle: Praktický buddhismus a hledání sebe sama. Praha: Soka Gakkai International – Česká republika z.s.
IKEDA, Daisaku. 1972. The Human Revolution. Volume 1. New York: Weatherhill.
LATOUR, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
LATOUR, Bruno. 2001. „What is Iconoclash? Or Is There a World beyond the Image Wars?“ Pp. 14–37 in Bruno LATOUR a Peter WEIBEL (eds.). Iconoclash, beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion and Srt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
LATOUR, Bruno. 2004. „How to Talk about the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies.“ Body and Society 10(2/3): 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943
LATOUR, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LATOUR, Bruno. 2010. On the Modern Cult of Factish Gods. Durham: Duke University Press.
LATOUR, Bruno. 2016. Stopovat a skládat světy s Bruno Latourem: výbor z díla 1998-2013. Praha: Tranzit.cz.
LAW, John. 1994. Organising Modernity: Social Order and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
„Lidská revoluce.“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2020 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/studijni_materialy/lidska_revoluce.html).
„Lotosová sútra.“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2020 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/buddhismus_nicirena_daisonina/lotosova_sutra.html).
MACHACEK, David a Bryan WILSON (eds.). 2000. Global Citizens: The Soka Gakkai Buddhist Movement in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
METRAUX, Daniel A. 2001. The International Expansion of a Modern Buddhist Movement: The Soka Gakkai in Southeast Asia and Australia. Maryland: University Press of America.
METRAUX, Daniel A. 1994. The Soka Gakkai revolution. New York: University Press of America.
„Nam-Mjóhó-Renge-Kjó.“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2020 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/praktikovani_buddhismu/nam_mjoho_renge_kjo.html).
PALEČEK, Jan. 2010. „Mariánský zázrak ve světle sociologie, sociologie ve světle slunečního zázraku.“ Biograf 52–53: 41–66.
„People & Perspectives.“ SGI, n.d. Cit. 16. května 2018 (https://www.sgi.org/people-and-perspectives/).
rocham2010. „What is the Gohonzon.“ SGI-USA, 2014 Cit. 16. května 2020 (https://buddhismsgiusa.wordpress.com/2014/09/21/what-is-the-gohonzon/).
SEAGER, Richard H. 2006. Encountering the Dharma. Daisaku Ikeda, Soka Gakkai, and the Globalization of Buddhist Humanism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
SEGAL, Robert A. 1983. „In Defense of Reductionism.“ Journal of the American Academy of Religion 51(1): 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LI.1.97
SEGAL, Robert A. 1985. „Anthropological Definitions of Religion.“ Zygon 20(1): 78–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1985.tb00579.x
SGI Deutschland. 2001. Eine Philosophie des Lebens: Einführung in den Buddhismus Nichirens. Město a nakladatel není uveden.
SGI-ČR. (2008). Buddhismus Ničirena Daišónina: Filozofie vítězného života. Praha: SGI-ČR.
SGI-ČR. (n.d. a) Základy Budhismu Ničirena Daišónina. Město a nakladatel není uveden.
SGI-ČR. (n.d. b). Sbírka s příběhy. Město a nakladatel není uveden.
SGI-ČR. (n.d. c). Text modlitby buddhismu Ničirena Daišónina. Není uvedeno. Město a nakladatel není uveden.
SNOW, David A. 1993. Shakubuku: A Study of the Nichiren Shoshu Buddhist Movement in America 1960-1975. New York: Garland.
SPALOVÁ, Barbora. 2012. Bůh ví proč: Studie pamětí a režimů moci v křesťanských církvích v severních Čechách. Brno: Centrum pro stadium demokracie a kultury.
„Stories and Reflections on the Buddhist Approach to Life.“ (n.d.). Cit. 30. 9. 2015 (https://www.sgi.org/people-and-perspectives/).
„The Gohonzon – Observing the Mind.“ SGI, n.d. Cit. 30. září 2015 (http://www.sgi.org/about-us/buddhism-in-daily-life/the-gohonzon-observing-the-mind.html).
„The Gohonzon.“ SGI, n.d. Cit. 30. září 2015 (http://www.sgi.org/about-us/gohonzon.html).
„The Gohonzon: Diagram of the Gohonzon.“ SGI-USA, 2017. Cit. 31. března 2018 (http://www.sgi-usa.org/memberresources/beginnersresources/diagramofgohonzon.php).
„The Real Aspect of the Gohonzon.“ Nichiren library, n.d. Cit. 21. března 2017 (http://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Content/101).
THOMAS, William I. a Florian ZNANIECKI. 1918. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vol I. New York: Dover.
„Warning to SGI.“ Anonymous, n.d. 30. září 2015 (https://www.youtube.com /wat ch?v=AHg5MFPK3Cg).
WEBER, Max. 1998. „Věda jako povolání.“ Pp. 109–134 in Max WEBER. Metodologie, sociologie, politika. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
WILSON, Bryan a James CRESSWELL (eds.). 1999. New Religious Movements: Challenge and Response. London: Routledge.
„Základní praktikování.“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2020 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/praktikovani_buddhismu/zakladni_praktikovani.html).
„Zkušenosti.“ SGI-CR, 2014. Cit. 30. září 2020 (http://www.sokagakkai.cz/praktikovani_buddhismu/zkusenosti.html).
Copyright (c) 2020 Petra Tlčimuková