Analýza sociálních sítí ve studiu sociálních hnutí
Roč.18,č.1(2021)
Nové přístupy v metodologii sociálněvědního výzkumu
For several decades, a relational perspective in collective action research has gained firm ground, introducing new concepts and theories. Also, Social Network Analysis (SNA) has become one of the most dynamic areas of analytical tools development in social studies, with the rapid expansion of both quantitative and qualitative applications and concepts. This combination has led to the innovation of research in collective action studies. This article aims to introduce SNA for the study of collective action, reviews various modes of its application, and provides a brief sketch of research problems SNA may help articulate and analyze. First, the article reviews theoretical developments in the study of collective action and the rise of a relational perspective. Second, it explains some of the basics and logic of SNA in the context of a relational perspective in collective action research. Third, it reviews the recent application of SNA in social movement studies at the individual level, the symbolic level (collective identity), and the organizational level.
social network analysis; social movements; protest; collective action
ALTHUSSER, Louis. 1970. For Marx. New York: Vintage Books.
Anheier, Helmut. 2003. „Movement Development and Organizational Networks: The Role of ‚Single Members‘ in the German Nazi Party, 1925–30.“ Pp. 49–74 in Mario DIANI a Doug McADAM (eds.). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0003
ANSELL, Christopher. 2003. „Community Embeddedness and Collaborative Governance in the San Francisco Bay Area Environmental Movement.“ Pp. 123–144 in Mario DIANI a Doug McADAM (eds.). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0006
BALDASSARRI, Delia a Mario DIANI. 2007. „The Integrative Power of Civic Networks.“ American Journal of Sociology 113(3): 735–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/521839
BANDY, Joe a Jackie SMITH (eds.). 2005. Coalitions across Borders. Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.
BEARMAN, Peter S. a Kevin D. EVERETT. 1993. „The Structure of Social Protest, 1961–1983.“ Social Networks 15(2): 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(93)90004-5
Bennett Lance W. a Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Biggs, Michael. 2005. „Strikes as Forest Fires: Chicago and Paris in the Late 19th Century.“ American Journal of Sociology 111(1): 1684–1714. https://doi.org/10.1086/427675
BORGATTI, Stephen P. a T. J. GROSSER. 2015. „Structural Equivalence: Meaning and Measures.“ In The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.43120-X
BORGATTI, Stephen P., Ajay MEHRA, Daniel J. BRASS a Giuseppe LABIANCA. 2009. „Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.“ Science 5916(323): 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
BORGATTI, Stephen P. a Pacey C. FOSTER. 2003. „The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology.“ Journal of Management 29(6): 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
BRUNS, Axel, Tim HIGHFIELD a Jean BURGESS. „The Arab Spring and Social Media Audiences: English and Arabic Twitter Users and Their Networks.“ American Behavioral Scientist 57(7): 871–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479374
BURT, Ronald S. 2005. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CAIANI, Manuela a Linda PARENTI. 2009. „The Dark Side of the Web: Italian Right-Wing Extremist Groups and the Internet.“ South European Society and Politics 14(3): 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740903342491
CAIANI, Manuela a Claudius WAGEMANN. 2009. „Online Networks of the Italian and German Extreme-right: An Explorative Study with Social Network Analysis.“ Information, Communication & Society 12(1): 66–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802158482
CARROLL, William K. a Robert S. RATNER. 1996. „Master Frames and Counter‐Hegemony: Political Sensibilities in Contemporary Social Movements.“ Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 33: 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1996.tb00955.x
Centola, Damon a Michael Macy. 2007. „Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties.“ American Journal of Sociology 113(3): 702–734. https://doi.org/10.1086/521848
CINALLI, Manlio a Katharina FÜGLISTER. 2008. „Networks and Political Contention Over Unemployment: A Comparison of Britain, Germany, and Switzerland.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 13(3): 259–276. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.13.3.p402571mjj74x074
CÍSAŘ, Ondřej a Jiří NAVRÁTIL. 2015. „Promoting Competition or Cooperation? The Impact of EU Funding on Czech Advocacy Organizations.“ Democratization 22(3): 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.869742
CROSSLEY, Nick. 2010. Towards Relational Sociology. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887066
DELLA PORTA, Donatella a Mario DIANI. 2007. Social Movements: An Introduction. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Di GREGORIO, Monica. 2012. „Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse?“ Environmental Politics 21(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.643366
DIANI, Mario a Doug McADAM (eds.). 2003. Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.001.0001
DIANI, Mario a Maria KOUSIS. 2014. „The Duality of Claims and Events: The Greek Campaign Against the Troika‘s Memoranda and Austerity, 2010–2012.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19(4): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.4.d865w28177575673
DIANI, Mario, Isobel LINDSAY a Derrick PURDUE. 2010. „Sustained Interactions? Social Movements and Coalitions in Local Settings.“ Pp. 219–238 in Nella VAN DYKE a Holly McCAMMON (eds.). Strategic Alliances: New Studies of Social Movement Coalitions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
DIANI, Mario. 1990. „The Network Structure of the Italian Ecology Movement.“ Information (International Social Science Council) 29(1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901890029001001
DIANI, Mario. 1992. „The Concept of Social Movement.“ Sociological Review 40: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x
DIANI, Mario. 1995. Green Networks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
DIANI, Mario. „The Network Structure of the Italian Ecology Movement.“ Information (International Social Science Council) 29(1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901890029001001
DIANI, Mario. 2003. „Introduction: Social Movements, Contentious Actions, and Social Networks: ‚From Metaphor to Substance‘?“ Pp. 1–18 in Mario DIANI a Doug McADAM (eds.). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0001
DIANI, Mario. 2015. The Cement of Civil Society: Studying Networks in Localities. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316163733
EGGERT, Nina a Katia PILATI. 2014. „Networks and Political Engagement of Migrant Organisations.“ European Journal of Political Research 53: 858–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12057
EGGERT, Nina. 2014. „The Impact of Political Opportunities on Interorganizational Networks: A Comparison of Migrants’ Organizational Fields.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19(4): 369–386. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.4.d5p65x6563778xv6
EMIRBAYER, Mustafa a Ann MISCHE. 1998. „What is Agency?“ American Journal of Sociology 103: 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Emirbayer, Mustafa a Jeff Goodwin. 1994. „Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.“ American Journal of Sociology 99: 1411–1454. https://doi.org/10.1086/230450
EMIRBAYER, Mustafa. 1997. „A Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.“ American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
Eyerman, Ron a Andrew Jamison. 1990. Social Movements. A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
FLIGSTEIN, Neil a Doug McADAM. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001
FUJDIAK, Ina a Petr OCELÍK. 2019. „Hyperlink Networks as a Means of Mobilization Used by Far-right Movements.“ Central European Journal of Communication 12(2): 134–149. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).2
González-Bailón, Sandra, Javier Borge-Holthoefer a Yamir MORENO. „Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion.“ American Behavioral Scientist 57(7): 943–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479371
GOULD, Roger V. 1991. „Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.“ American Sociological Review 56: 716–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096251
GRANOVETTER, Mark. 1983. „The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.“ Sociological Theory 1: 201–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
GRANOVETTER, Mark. 1973. „The Strength of Weak Ties.“ American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
HANNEMAN, Robert A. a Mark RIDDLE. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside.
HATHAWAY, Will a David S. MEYER. 1993. „Competition and Cooperation in Social Movement Coalitions: Lobbying for Peace in the 1980s.“ Berkeley Journal of Sociology 38: 157–183.
HEANEY, Michael a Fabio ROJAS. 2007. „Partisans, Nonpartisans, and the Antiwar Movement in the United States.“ American Politics Research 35(4): 431–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07300763
HEANEY, Michael a Fabio ROJAS. 2008. „Coalition Dissolution, Mobilization, and Network Dynamics in the U.S. Antiwar Movement.“ Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change 28: 39–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-786X(08)28002-X
HEANEY, Michael a Fabio ROJAS. 2014. „Hybrid Activism: Social Movement Mobilization in a Multimovement Environment.“ American Journal of Sociology 119(4): 1047–1103. https://doi.org/10.1086/674897
HEDSTRÖM, Peter a Richard SWEDBERG. 2007. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HEDSTRÖM, Peter. 1994. „Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890–1940.“ American Journal of Sociology 99(5): 1157–1179. https://doi.org/10.1086/230408
KITTS, James. 2000. „Mobilizing in Black Boxes: Social Networks and Participation in Social Movement Organizations.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 5(2): 241–257. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.5.2.5408016w34215787
KNOKE, David a Song YANG. 2008. Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985864
KRACKHARDT, David. 1992. „The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations.“ Pp. 216–239 in Nitin NOHRIA a Robert ECCLES (eds.). Networks and Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
KRIESI, Hanspeter. 1988. „The Interdependence of Structure and Action.“ International Social Movement Research 1: 349–68.
KRINSKY, John a Nick CROSSLEY. 2014. „Social Movements and Social Networks: Introduction.“ Social Movement Studies 13(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.862787
MARIN, Alexandra a WELLMAN, Barry. 2011. „Social Network Analysis: An Introduction.“ Pp. 11–25 in John SCOTT a Peter J. CARRINGTON (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294413.n2
Mazák, Jaromír a Tomáš Diviák. 2018. „Transactional Activism without Transactions: Network Perspective on Anti-Corruption Activism in the Czech Republic.“ Social Movement Studies 17(2): 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1404904
McADAM, Doug a Ronnelle PAULSEN. „Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism.“ American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 640–667. https://doi.org/10.1086/230319
McADAM, Doug a Sidney TARROW. 2011. „Introduction: Dynamics of Contention Ten Years On.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 16(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.16.1.61m83k7n14813365
McADAM, Doug, Sidney G. TARROW a Charles TILLY. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805431
McADAM, Doug. 2003. „Beyond Structural Analysis: Toward a More Dynamic Understanding of Social Movements.“ Pp. 281–298 in Mario DIANI a Doug McADAM (eds.). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0012
MELUCCI, Alberto. 1985. „The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements.“ Social Research 52(4): 789–816.
Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891
NAVRÁTIL, Jiří. 2016. Od ekonomické globalizace k „válce proti terorismu“. Proměny českého levicového aktivismu na počátku 21. století. Praha: SLON.
NAVRÁTIL, Jiří. 2017. „Radical and Moderate Left Activism in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia (1989–2010).“ Pp. 62–81 in Magnus WENNERHAG, Christian FRÖHLICH a Grzegorz PIOTROWSKI. Radical Left Movements in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603483-4
OLIVER, Pamela E. 1984. „If You Don‘t Do It, Nobody Else Will’: Active and Token Contributors to Local Collective Action.“ American Sociological Review 49: 601–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095418
OLIVER, Pamela E. a Daniel J. MYERS. 2003. „Networks, Diffusion, and Cycles of Collective Action.“ Pp. 173–203 in Mario DIANI a Doug McADAM (eds.). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OPP, Karl-Dieter. 1989. The Rationality of Political Protest: A Comparative Analysis of Rational Choice Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
PADOVANI, Claudia a Elena PAVAN. 2016. „Global Governance and ICTs: Exploring Online Governance Networks around Gender and Media.“ Global Networks 16: 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12119
PASSY, Florence. 2001. „Socialization, Connection, and The Structure/Agency Gap: A Specification of The Impact of Networks on Participation in Social Movements.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 6(2): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.6.2.v6u4wg67x87w943h
PASSY, Florence. 2003. „Social Networks Matter. But How?“ Pp. 21–48 in Mario DIANI and Doug McADAM (eds.). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
PAVAN, Elena a Arianna MAINARDI. 2018. „Striking, Marching, Tweeting. Studying How Online Networks Change Together with Movements.“ Partecipazione e Conflitto 11: 394–422.
PAVAN, Elena. 2017. „The Integrative Power of Online Collective Action Networks Beyond Protest. Exploring Social Media Use in the Process of Institutionalization.“ Social Movement Studies 16(4): 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1268956
PILNY, Andrew a Michelle SHUMATE. 2012. „Hyperlinks as Extensions of Offline Instrumental Collective Action.“ Information, Communication & Society 15(2): 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.606328
PRELL, Christine. 2012. Social Network Analysis: History, Theory & Methodology. Los Angeles: Sage.
RUCHT, Dieter. 1989. „Environmental Movement Organizations in West Germany and France: Structure and Interorganizational Relations.“ International Social Movement Research 2: 61–94.
SAUNDERS, Clare. 2007. „Using Social Network Analysis to Explore Social Movements: A Relational Approach.“ Social Movement Studies 6(3): 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701777769
SAUNDERS, Clare. 2011. „Unblocking the Path to Effective Block Modeling in Social Movement Research.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 16(3): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.16.3.a70276715p171144
SHUMATE, Michelle a Lori DEWITT. 2008. „The North/South Divide in NGO Hyperlink Networks.“ Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 13: 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00402.x
SHUMATE, Michelle, Yuli Patrick HSIEH a Amy O’CONNOR. 2018. „A Nonprofit Perspective on Business–Nonprofit Partnerships: Extending the Symbiotic Sustainability Model.“ Business & Society 57(7): 1337–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316645051
SIMMEL, Georg. 1964. Conflict. Glencoe: Free Press.
SINGH, Sourabh. 2019. „How Should We Study Relational Structure? Critically Comparing the Epistemological Positions of Social Network Analysis and Field Theory.“ Sociology 53: 762–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518821307
SNOW, David A., E. Burke ROCHFORD, Steven K. WORDEN a Robert D. BENFORD. 1986. „Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.“ American Sociological Review 51(4): 464–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
STODDART, Mark C. J. a D. B. TINDALL. 2010. „‚We’ve Also Become Quite Good Friends‘: Environmentalists, Social Networks and Social Comparison in British Columbia, Canada.“ Social Movement Studies 9(3): 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2010.493658
TARROW, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TAYLOR, Verta a Nancy E. WHITTIER. 1992. „Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.“ Pp. 104–129 in A. D. MORRIS a C. M. MUELLER (eds.). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
TILLY, Charles a Sidney TARROW. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
TILLY, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
TINDALL, David a Jeffrey CORMIER. 2008. „Gender, Network Capital, Social Capital, and Political Capital: The Consequences of Personal Network Diversity for Environmentalists in British Columbia.“ Pp. 282–307 in Nan LIN a Bonnie H. ERICSON. Social Capital: An International Research Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234387.003.0123
TOURAINE, Alain. 1983. Solidarity: The Analysis of a Social Movement: Poland, 1980–1981. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TURNER, Ralph H. a Lewis M. KILLIAN. 1972. Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
VON BÜLOW, Marisa. 2011. „Brokers in Action: Transnational Coalitions and Trade Agreements in the Americas.“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 16(2): 165–180. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.16.2.h1253k242357k55g
WADA, Takeshi. 2004. „Event Analysis of Claim Making in Mexico: How are Social Protests Transformed into Political Protests?“ Mobilization: An International Quarterly 9(3): 241–257. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.9.3.7wx2pt66130718v3
ZALD, Mayer N. a Bert USEEM. 1982. Movement and Countermovement: Loosely Coupled Conflict. Working Paper 267, University of Michigan Center for Research on Social Organization.

Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2021 Jiří Navrátil