Situační analýza a role diskurzů v sociálněvědním výzkumu
Roč.18,č.1(2021)
Nové přístupy v metodologii sociálněvědního výzkumu
The article introduces situation analysis (cf. Clarke 2005) as an epistemologicalontological basis for science freed of the positivistic paradigm. Situation analysis in a broader perspective dives into present discourses as well as discourses that have been concealed. At the meso-level, the analysis offers insight into social and discursive arenas formed by collective actors, key material elements, social organizations and institutions. At the micro-level it is aimed at the position of individual actors in a situation. Situational analysis provides multidimensional research resonating marginalized discourses and supports the everydayness of knowledge in a socially engaged, emic research of social reality. The focus on language constructions in the humanities allows for the re-definition of one’s own entities, formulas, and rules. Their (im)possible transgression is a necessary response to the accelerated and diverse shape of the recent globalized and particularized society.
situation analysis; re-presentation; discourse; methodology; qualitative research
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Banks, Marcus. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020284
BARCELOS, Chrisie A. 2014. „Producing (Potentially) Pregnant Teen Bodies: Biopower and Adolescent Pregnancy in the USA.“ Critical Public Health 24(4): 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.853869
Berger, Peter L. a Thomas Luckmann. 1999. Sociální konstrukce reality: Pojednání o sociologii vědění. Praha: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Buckingham, D. 2011. The Material Child: Growing Up in Consumer Culture. Malden: Polity Press.
CHEN, Jia-shin. 2011. „Studying Up Harm Reduction Policy: The Office as an Assemblage.“ International Journal of Drug Policy 22(6): 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.08.008
Clarke, Adele E., Carrie Friese a Rachel Washburn (eds.). 2015. Situational Analysis in Practice. Mapping Research with Grounded Theory. London: Left Coast Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315420134
Clarke, Adele E. a Reiner KELLER. 2014. „Engaging Complexities: Working against Simplification as an Agenda for Qualitative Research Today. Adele Clarke in Conversation with Reiner Keller.“ Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 15(2): 1–40.
Clarke, Adele E. a Reiner KELLER. 2012. Situationsanalyse. Grounded Theory nach dem Postmodern Turn. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Clarke, Adele E. 2007. „Grounded Theory: Critiques, Debates, and Situational Analysis.“ Pp. 835–885 in William Outhwaite a Stephen P. Turner (eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodology. London: SAGE.
Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Clarke, Adele, E. 2003. „Situational Analysis. Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn.“ Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
ČEJKOVÁ, Ingrid. 2018. „Žákovské hodnocení výuky na gymnáziu: výpovědi sexty A.“ Pedagogická orientace 28(3): 408–434. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-3-408
FLETCHER, Isabel a Adele E. CLARKE. 2018. „Imagining Alternative and Better Worlds: Isabel Fletcher Talks with Adele E. Clarke.“ Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 222–245. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.216
Foucault, Michel. 2002. Archeologie vědění. Praha: Herrmann & synové.
Foucault, Michel. 2000. Dohlížet a trestat: kniha o zrodu vězení. Praha: Dauphin.
Fulton, John a Catherine Hayes. 2012. „Situational Analysis–Framing Approaches to Interpretive Inquiry in Healthcare Research.“ International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 19(12): 662–669. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.12.662
French, Martin a Fiona A. Miller. 2012. „Leveraging the ‚Living Laboratory‘: On the Emergence of the Entrepreneurial Hospital.“ Social Science & Medicine 75: 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.010
Gagnon, Marilou, Jean D. Jacob a Dave Holmes. 2015. „Governing Through (In)Security: A Critical Analysis of a Fear-Based Public Health Campaign.“ Critical Public Health 20(2): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590903314092
Giddens, Anthony. 2007. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
GENAT, Bill. 2009. „Building Emergent Situated Knowledges in Participatory Action Research.“ Action Research 7(1):101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750308099600
Gergen, Kenneth. J. 2008. „Social Construction: Revolution in the Making.“ Pp. 1–30 in Kenneth J. Gergen (ed.). An Invitation to Social Construction (2nd Edition). London: SAGE.
Glaser, Barney G. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Versus Forcing. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
GREYSON, Davon, Heather O’BRIEN a Jean SHOVELLER. 2017. „Constructing Knowledge and Ignorance in the Social Information Worlds of Young Mothers.“ Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54: 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401016
HANKOVÁ, Magdalena a Soňa VÁVROVÁ. 2017. Partnerské vztahy očima mladých dospělých s vrozeným tělesným postižením. Praha: Grada.
Harré, Rom a Grant R. Gillet. 2001. Diskurz a myseľ: úvod do diskurzívnej psychológie. Bratislava: Iris.
Hjelm, Titus. 2011. „Discourse Analysis.“ Pp. 134–150 in Michael STAUSBERG a Steven ENGLE (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Abingdon: Routledge.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2000. „Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.“ Pp. 509–536 in Norman DENZIN a Yvonna S. LINCOLN. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Kalenda, Jan. 2016a. „Prozatím nevyužitá šance: situační analýza v pedagogickém výzkumu.“ Pedagogická orientace 26(3): 457–481. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2016-3-457
Kalenda, Jan. 2016b. „Situational Analysis as a Framework for Interdisciplinary Research in the Social Science.“ Human Affairs 26(3): 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2016-0029
Kalenda, Jan a Soňa VÁVROVÁ. 2016. „Self-Regulated Learning in Students of Helping Professions.“ Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 217: 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.086
KARGER, Tomáš. 2019. „Mediální kurace jako praxe paměti: Situační analýza mnemonických praxí mládeže.“ Historická sociologie 11(1): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2019.3
KARGER, Tomáš. 2017. „Explanatory Principles in Research of Collective Memory: Culture, Cognition and their Situatedness.“ Historická sociologie 9(2): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2017.37
KISSOVÁ, Blanka, Romana LUKÁŠOVÁ a Daniel TOPINKA. (2018). „Institucionální pomoc v oblasti domácího násilí z perspektivy obětí domácího násilí v partnerském vztahu.“ Czech & Slovak Social Work/Sociální práce 18(2): 72–84.
KELLER, Reiner. 2011. „The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD).“ Human Studies 34(1): 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z
KHAW, Lyndal. 2012. „Mapping the Process: An Exemplar of Using Situational Analysis in a Grounded Theory Study.“ Journal of Family Theory and Review 4: 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00126.x
Lakoff, George a Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Luhmann, Niklas. 2006. Sociální systémy. Brno: CDK.
MALDONADO-TORRES, Nelson. 2017. „On the Coloniality of Human Rights.“ Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 114: 117–136. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.6793
Martin, Wanda, Bernie Pauly a Marjorie MacDonald. 2016. „Situational Analysis for Complex Systems: Methodological Development in Public Health Research.“ AIMS Public Health 3(1): 94–109. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.94
Meyer, Renate E., Markus A. HÖLLERER, Dennis JANCSARY a Theo Van LEEUWEN. 2013. „The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research.“ Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 489–555. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.781867
MILWERTZ, Cecilia a Wang FENGXIAN. 2011. „The Relational and Intra-Active Becoming of Nongovernment-Initiated Organizing in the People’s Republic of China.“ Gender, Technology and Development 15(3): 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185241101500307
Phillips, Nelson a Cynthia HARDY. 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: SAGE, CA: Thousand Oaks.
Potter, Jonathan. 2000. „Post-Cognitive Psychology.“ Theory & Psychology 10(1): 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300010001596
Rose, Gillian. 2012. An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage Publication.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
SALAZAR, Mariano a Ann ÖHMAN. 2015. „Negotiating Masculinity, Violence, and Responsibility: A Situational Analysis of Young Nicaraguan Men’s Discourses on Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence.“ Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 24(2): 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1002652
Schut, Marc. et al. 2014. „Towards Dynamic Research Configurations: A Framework for Reflection on the Contribution of Research to Policy and Innovation Processes.“ Science and Public Policy 41: 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct048
STANKOVÁ, Zuzana. 2020. „Zdroje podpory sociálního začleňování: perspektiva sociálních pracovníků působících v sociálně vyloučených lokalitách na území Moravskoslezského kraje.“ Czech & Slovak Social Work/Sociální práce 20(2): 61–78.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1978. „A Social Worlds Perspective.“ Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1: 119–128.
Strauss, Anselm L. a Juliet Corbin. 1999. Základy kvalitativního výzkumu: Postupy a techniky metody zakotvené teorie. Boskovice: Sdružení Podané ruce.
Suddaby, Roy. 2006. „What Grounded Theory is Not.“ Academy of Management Journal 49(4): 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020
Tůma, František. 2016. „Konverzační analýza a interakce ve třídě: východiska a metodologické aspekty.“ Pedagogická orientace 26(3): 415–441. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2016-3-415
van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.). 2006a. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2006b. „Discourse, Context and Cognition.“ Discourse Studies 8(1): 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565
van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
VENTEROVÁ, L. 2018. „Home Preparation of Anglophone Children for School: The Influence of a Different Culture.“ Sociální pedagogika/ Social Education 6(2): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.7441/soced.2018.06.02.02
VLČKOVÁ, Kristýna. 2017. „Rozhodování rodičů o odkladu školní docházky v kontextu výběru školy.“ Orbis scholae 11(1): 31–50. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2017.16
Vojtíšková, Kateřina. 2008. „Studium sociální struktury jako konstruovaného prostoru. Sociální kategorizace a sociální identita.“ Pp. 61–78 in Jiří ŠAFR (ed.). Sociální distance, interakce, relace a kategorizace: alternativní teoretické perspektivy studia sociální stratifikace. Praha: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.
Wodak, Ruth a Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
Wooffitt, Robin. 2005. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: a Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208765
Young, Iris M. 2007. Global Challenges. War, Self-Determination and Responsibility for Justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zábrodská, Kateřina. 2009. Variace na gender: poststrukturalismus, diskurzivní analýza a genderová identita. Praha: Academia.
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2021 Markéta Košatková