How Not to Prepare Majales: A Meaning-Centred Analysis of Subversive Student Performances in Communist Czechoslovakia

Dominik Želinský, Werner Binder


This study offers a sociological analysis of a student carnival in communist Czechoslovakia, the Majales in Bratislava and Prague in May 1956. Utilizing sources such as newspaper articles, photographs and witness accounts, this case study aims to reconstruct the conditions, meanings and consequences of Majales, employing a theoretical framework that highlights processes of communication between centre and periphery. It is argued that the Majales were facilitated by a destabilization of the symbolic centre, triggered by Stalin’s death in March 1953 and Khrushchev’s speech in February 1956. This set the stage for the students, who criticized the centre with subversive performances and playful demonstrations of dissatisfaction. Finally, the initial reception of the performances in the official media and the efforts
of the state apparatus to control the meanings of Majales are discussed.

Klíčová slova

Stalinism; carnival; cultural sociology; hermeneutics; 1956

Plný Text:

Mobi (English) ePub (English)


Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy.” Pp. 29−90 in Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics and Ritual, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen and Jason L. Mast. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. The Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Philip Smith. 2003. “The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics.” Pp. 11−26 in The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology, by Jeffrey C. Alexander. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bakthin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Blaha, Anton (ed.). 2007. Pyžamová revolúcia [The Pyjama Revolution]. Bratislava: Nebojsa, s r.o.

Blaive, Muriel. 2001. Promarněná příležitost: Československo a rok 1956 [A Wasted Opportunity: Czechoslovakia and the Year 1956]. Prague: Prostor.

Bondy, Egon. 2008. “Kořeny českého literárního undergroundu v letech 1949−1953.” [The Roots of Czech Literary Underground in Years 1949-1953]. Pp. 61−69 in Pohledy zevnitř: Česká undergroundová kultura v dokumentech a interpretacích [Perspectives from Inside: Czech Underground Culture in Documents and Interpretations], edited by Martin Machovec. Příbram: Pistorius & Olšanská.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chan, Elaine. 1999. “Structural and Symbolic Centres: Centre Displacement in the 1989 Chinese Student Movement.” International Sociology 14(3): 337−354.

Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.

Durkheim, Émile. 2008. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eco, Umberto. 1998. “Towards a Semiological Guerilla Warfare.” Pp. 135−144 in Faith in Fakes Travels in Hyperreality, edited by Umberto Eco. London: Vintage.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Glaeser, Andreas. 2010. Political Epistemics: The Secret Police, the Opposition, and the End of East German Socialism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kantorowicz, Ernst H. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kołakowski, Leszek. 1981. Main Currents of Marxism: Its Origin, Growth and Dissolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kramer, Mark. 2008. “Leadership Succession and Political Violence in the USSR Following Stalin’s Death.” Pp. 69−92 in Political Violence: Belief, Behavior, and Legitimation, edited by Paul Hollander. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Macura, Vladimír. 2008. Šťastný věk a jiné studie o socialistické kultuře [A Merry Age and Other Studies about Socialist Culture]. Prague: Academia.

Marušiak, Juraj. 2007. “Slovenskí študenti a inteligencia v roku 1956.” [Slovak Students and the Intelligentsia in the Year 1956]. Pp. 7−64 in Pyžamová revolúcia [The Pyjama Revolution], edited by Anton Blaha. Bratislava: Nebojsa, s.r.o.

Matthews, John P. C. 1998. Majales: The Abortive Student Revolt in Czechoslovakia in 1956. Working Paper No. 24. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Merton, Robert K. and Pitirim Sorokin. 1937. “Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 42(5): 615−629.

Možný Ivo. 1991. Proč tak snadno? Některé rodinné důvody sametové revoluce [Why so Easy? Some Family Reasons for the Velvet Revolution]. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.

Pernes, Jiří. 2008. Krize komunistického režimu v Československu v 50. letech 20. století [The Crisis of Communist Regime in Czechoslovakia in the 1950s]. Brno: CDK.

Petráň, Josef. 2015. Filosofové dělají revoluci [Philosophers Doing Revolution]. Prague: Academia.

Shils, Edward A. 1961. “Center and Periphery.” Pp. 117−130 in The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi, edited by Edward A. Shils. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Shils, Edward A. and Michael Young. 1953. “The Meaning of the Coronation.” Sociological Review 1(2): 63−81.

Skilling, Harold G. [1977] 1999. “Stalinism and Czechoslovak Political Culture.” Pp. 257−282 in Stalinism: Essays in Historical Interpretation, edited by Robert C. Tucker. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Svatoš, Michal. 1999. “Studentské majálesy šedesátých let.” [Student Majaleses in the Sixties]. Retrieved February 10, 2016 (

Švihran. 2007. “Bod zlomu.” [The Breaking Point]. Pp. 98−108 in Pyžamová revolúcia [The Pyjama Revolution], edited by Anton Blaha. Bratislava: Nebojsa, s.r.o.

Szakolczai, Arpad. 2009. “Liminality and Experience: Structuring Transitory Situations and Transformative Events.” International Political Anthropology 2(1): 141−172.

Turner, Victor W. 1980. The Ritual Process: Structure and Antistructure. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

Voegelin, Eric. [1938] 2000. “The Political Religions.” Pp. 19−74 in Modernity Without Restraint: Collected Works 5, edited by Manfred Henningsen. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2014. “Hegel’s Logic as a Theory of Ideology.” Synthome 15. Retrieved August 18, 2016 (

Crossref Cited-by (1)

Služba reprezentuje výstupy citací nakladatelů zapojených do systému Cited-by (rozšířená služba Crossref).

1. The spectre of the queue: resignifying the past in the post-communist Czech Republic
Pavel Pospěch
American Journal of Cultural Sociology  rok: 2019