Rural as Periphery Per Se? Unravelling the Discursive Node

Bianka Plüschke-Altof

Abstrakt

Despite often being used interchangeably, the dominant equation of the rural with the peripheral is not self-evident. In order to critically scrutinize the discursive node, the aim of this article is twofold. On one hand, it argues for overcoming the prevalent urban‒rural divide and dominant structural approaches in sociological and geographical research by introducing discursive peripheralization as a conceptual framework, which allows the analysis of the discursive (re-)production of socio-spatial inequalities on and between different scales. On the other hand, this article explores how rural areas are constituted as peripheries within a hegemonic discourse naturalizing the ascription of development (non-)potentials. Following a critical discourse analysis approach, this will be illustrated in the case of periphery constructions in Estonian national print media.

Klíčová slova

discursive peripheralization; rural peripheries; critical discourse analysis; Estonia

Plný Text:

Mobi (English) ePub (English)

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Annist, Aet. 2011. Otsides kogukonda sotsialismijärgses keskuskülas. Arenguantropoloogiline uurimus. Tallinn: ACTA Universitatis Tallinnensis.

Balčytienė, Auksė and Halliki Harro-Loit. 2009. “Between Reality and Illusion: Re-Examining the Diversity of Media and Online Professional Journalism in the Baltic States.” Journal of Baltic Studies 40(4): 517‒530. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770903320148

Balogh, Péter. 2015. “The Land of Storms and the Region Where the Country’s Heart Beats: Changing Images of Peripherality in Hungary.” Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64(3): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.5

Beetz, Stephan. 2008. “Peripherisierung als räumliche Organisation sozialer Ungleichheit.” Pp. 7‒16 in Peripherisierung: Eine neue Form sozialer Ungleichheit? edited by Eva Barlösius and Claudia Neu. Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Benedek, József and Aura Moldovan. 2015. “Economic Convergence and Polarisation: Towards a Multi-dimensional Approach.” Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64(3): 187‒204. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.3

Blondel, C. Forthcoming. “How Can We Approach Peripheralisation Without Peripheralising? Decolonising (Our) Discourses on Socio-spatial Polarisation in Europe.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (under review).

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bristow, Gillian. 2010. “Resilient Regions. Re-‘Place’ing Regional Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3(1): 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp030

Bristow, Gillian. 2005. “Everyone’s a ‘Winner’: Problematising the Discourse of Regional Competitiveness.” Journal of Economic Geography 5(3): 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbh063

Burdack, Joachim, Nadler, Robert and Michael Woods. 2015. “Rural Regions, Globalization and Regional Responses: The Case of Oberlausitz Region.” Pp. 323‒339 in Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization, edited by Thilo Lang, Sebastian Henn, Wladimir Sbignev and Kornelia Ehrlich. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137415080_18

Bürk, Thomas, Manfred Kühn and Hanna Sommer. 2012. “Stigmatisation of Cities: The Vulnerability of Local Identities.” Raumforschung and Raumordnung 70: 337‒347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0160-4

Cloke, Paul. 2003. Country Visions. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Cloke, Paul, Terry Marsden and Patrick Mooney, P. 2006. The Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage.

Copus, Andrew K. 2001. “From Core-periphery to Polycentric Development: Concepts of Spatial and Aspatial Peripherality.” European Planning Studies 9(4): 539‒552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120049899

Eesti Ajalehtede LIIT (EALL). 2016. “EALL liikmeslehtede ja Ajakirjade Liidu väljaannete keskmised tiraažid.” Retrieved February 15, 2016 (http://www.eall.ee/tiraazhid/index.html).

Eurotopics. 2015. “Estonia’s Female Journalists are Afraid of Opinions.” Eurotopics archive. Retrieved February 15, 2016 (http://archiv.eurotopics.net/en/home/presseschau/archiv/article/ARTICLE168608-Estonia-s-female-journalists-are-afraid-of-opinions).

Eurotopics. 2016. “Media Estonia: Europe’s Press Comments.” Retrieved February 15, 2016 (http://www.eurotopics.net/en/142186/media).

Fischer-Tahir, Andrea and Matthias Naumann, M. 2013. “Introduction: Peripheralization as the Social Production of Spatial Dependencies and Injustice.” Pp. 9‒26 in Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, edited by Andrea Fischer-Tahir and Matthias Naumann. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_1

Foucault, Michel. 1999. Botschaften der Macht. Der Foucault-Reader. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.

Freedom House. 2016. “Estonia: Freedom of the Press 2015.” Retrieved February 15, 2016 (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2015/estonia).

Gregory, Derek. 1994. Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

Halfacree, Keith. 2006. “From Dropping Out to Leading On? British Counter-Cultural Back-to-the-Land in a Changing Rurality.” Progress in Human Geography 30(3): 309‒336. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph609oa

Halfacree, Keith. 2007. “Trial by Space for a ‘Radical Rural’: Introducing Alternative Localities, Representation and Lives.” Journal of Rural Studies 23(2): 125‒141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002

Jacobs, Jane M. 1996. “Authentically Yours: De-touring the Map.” Pp. 132‒156 in Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City, edited by Jane M. Jacobs. New York: Routledge.

Jäger, Siegfried. 1999. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. Duisburg: DISS.

Jäger, Siegfried. 2008. “Zwischen den Kulturen: Diskursanalytische Grenzgänge.” Pp. 327‒351 in Kultur – Medien – Macht: Cultural Studies und Medienanalyse, edited by Andreas Hepp and Rainer Winter. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90668-3_21

Juska, Arunas. 2007. “Discourses on Rurality in Post-socialist News Media: The Case of Lithuania’s Leading Daily ‘Lietuvos Rytas’ (1991–2004).” Journal of Rural Studies 23(1): 238‒253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.11.003

Kährik, Anneli, Kadri Leetmaa and Tiit Tammaru. 2012. “Residential Decision-Making and satisfaction Among New Suburbanites in the Tallinn Urban Region, Estonia.” Cities 29(1): 49‒58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.005

Kaukvere, Tiina. 2014. “Vaata, millised on Eesti võimekaimad ja nõrgimad omavalitsused.” Postimees. Retrieved February 15, 2016 (http://www.postimees.ee/2948519/vaata-millised-on-eesti-voimekaimad-ja-norgimad-omavalitsused).

Kay, Rebecca, Sergei Shubin and Tatjana Thelen. 2012. “Rural Realities in the Post-socialist Space.” Journal of Rural Studies 28(2): 55‒62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.03.001

Kobayashi, Kiyoshi and Hans Westlund. 2013. Social Capital and Rural Development in the Knowledge Society. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Koobak Redi and Raili Marling. 2014. “The Decolonial Challenge: Framing Post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe within Transnational Feminist Studies.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 21(4): 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506814542882

Keim, Karl-Dieter. 2006. “Peripherisierung ländlicher Räume: Essay.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 37: 3‒7.

Kühn, Manfred. 2015 “Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities.” European Planning Studies 23(2): 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518

Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.

Lang, Thilo. 2013. “Conceptualizing Urban Shrinkage in East Germany: Understanding Regional Peripheralization in the Light of Discursive Forms of Region Building.” Pp. 224‒238 in Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, edited by Andrea Fischer-Tahir and Matthias Naumann. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_11

Lang, Thilo, Sebastian Henn, Wladimir Sbignev and Kornelia Ehrlich. 2015. “Understanding New Geographies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Pp. 1‒24 in Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization, edited by Thilo Lang, Sebastian Henn, Wladimir Sbignev and Kornelia Ehrlich. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lauristin, Marju and Peeter Vihalemm. 2009. “The Political Agenda during Different Periods of Estonian Transformation: External and Internal Factors.” Journal of Baltic Studies 40(1): 1‒28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770902722237

Leetmaa, Kadri, Agnes Kriszan, Mari Nuga and Joachim Burdack. 2015. “Strategies to Cope with Shrinkage in the Lower End of the Urban Hierarchy in Estonia and Central Germany.” European Planning Studies 23(1): 147‒165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.820100

Lefebvre, Henri. 1974. 2002. “The Production of Space.” Pp. 131‒141 in The Spaces of Postmodernity: Readings in Human Geography, edited by Michael Dear and Steven Flusty. Oxford: Blackwell.

Leibert, Tim. 2013. “The Peripheralization of Rural Areas in Post-Socialist Central Europe: A Case of Fragmenting Development? Lessons for Rural Hungary.” Pp. 101‒120 in Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, edited by Andrea Fischer-Tahir and Matthias Naumann. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_5

Link, Jürgen. 1982. “Kollektivsymbolik und Mediendiskurse.” kultuRRevolution 1: 6‒21.

Madariaga, Aldo. 2010. “Mechanisms of Institutional Continuity in Neoliberal ‘Success Stories’: Development Regime in Chile and Estonia.” Köln: Max-Planck-Institute für Gesellschaftsforschung. Retrieved January 25, 2016 (http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81130/1/766849341.pdf).

Meyer, Frank and Judith Miggelbrink. 2013. “The Subject and the Periphery: About Discourses, Loopings and Ascriptions.” Pp. 207‒223 in Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, edited by Andrea Fischer-Tahir and Matthias Naumann. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_10

Miggelbrink, Judith and Frank Meyer. 2015. “Lost in Complexity? Researching the Role of Socio-Spatial Ascriptions in the Process of Peripheralization.” Pp. 62‒79 in Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization, edited by Thilo Lang, Sebastian HENN, Wladimir Sbignev and Kornelia Ehrlich. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137415080_4

Naumann, Matthias and Anja Reichert-Schick. 2013. “Infrastructure and Peripheralization: Empirical Evidence from North-Eastern Germany.” Pp. 145‒167 in Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, edited by Andrea Fischer-Tahir and Matthias Naumann. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_7

Nugin, Raili. 2014. “’I Think that They Should Go: Let Them See Something’: The Context of Rural Youth’s Out-migration in Post-socialist Estonia.” Journal of Rural Studies 34: 51‒64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.003

Paasi, Anssi. 1995. “The Social Construction of Peripheriality: The Case of Finland and the Finnish-Russian Border Area.” Pp. 235‒258 in Competitive European Peripheries, edited by Heikki Eskelinen and Folke Snickars. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79955-6_12

Paasi, Anssi. 2010. “Regions are Social Constructs, but Who or What ‘Constructs’ Them? Agency in Question.” Environment and Planning A 42(10): 2296‒2301. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232

Pfoser, Alena. 2014. “Between Russia and Estonia: Narratives of Place in a New Borderland.” Nationalities Papers 42(2): 269‒285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.774341

Pike, Andy, Andrés Rodriguez-Pose and John Tomaney. 2007. “What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?” Regional Studies 41(9): 1253‒1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543355

Plüschke-Altof, Bianka. 2015. “Kolonisatoren von gestern, MitbürgerInnen von heute? Wandelnde Grenzziehungen gegenüber der russischen Minderheit in Estland.” Pp. 347‒381 in Tagungsband des 4. Studentischen Soziologiekongresses: Krisen, Prozesse, Potenziale, edited by Simon Scholz and Julian Dütsch. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.

Plüschke, Bianka. 2015. “Visions of the Rural Impeding Development? Discourses on a ‘Problematic’ Region in Estonia.” Conference Proceedings European Society for Rural Sociology Congress 134‒135. Aberdeen: European Society for Rural Sociology.

Pospěch, Pavel. 2014. “Discursive No Man’s Land: Analysing the Discourse of the Rural in the Transitional Czech Republic.” Journal of Rural Studies 34: 96‒107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006

Pred, Allan. 1984. “Place as Historically Contingent Process: Structuration and the Time-Geography of Becoming Places.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74(2): 279‒297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01453.x

Schwab-Trapp, Michael. 2006. “Diskurs als soziologisches Konzept: Bausteine einer soziologisch orientierten Diskursanalyse.” Pp. 263‒285 in Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftlicher Diskursanalyse. Band I: Theorien und Methoden, edited by Reiner Keller, Andreas Hirseland, Werner Schneider and Willy Viehöver. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Shearmur, Richard. 2012. “Are Cities the Fond of Innovation? A Critical Review of the Literature on Cities and Innovation.” Cities 29(2): S9‒S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008

Shucksmith, Mark, Stuart Cameron, Tanya Merridew and Florian Pichler. 2009. “Urban-Rural Differences in Quality of Life Across the European Union.” Regional Studies 43(10): 1275‒1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802378750

Smith, Adrian and Judit Timár. 2010. “Uneven Transformations: Space, Economy and Society 20 years After the Collapse of State Socialism.” European Urban and Regional Studies 17(2): 115‒125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409358245

Sooväli, Helen. 2004. Saaremaa Waltz: Landscape Imagery of Saaremaa Island in the 20th Century. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? Postkolonialität und subalterne Artikulation. Wien: Turia and Kant.

Statistics Estonia. 2009. “According to the Regional Development, Estonia can be Divided into Three Parts.” News Release No. 139. Retrieved February 15, 2016 (http://www.stat.ee/38531).

Statistics Estonia. 2015. “Social Exclusion and Poverty.” Statistical Yearbook of Estonia. Retrieved February 15, 2016 (http://www.stat.ee/social-exclusion-and-poverty).

Steinführer, Annett. 2015. “’Landflucht’ und ‘sterbende Städte’: Diskurse über ländliche Schrumpfung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart.” Geographische Rundschau 9: 4‒10.

Stenning, Alison and Kathrin Hörschelmann. 2008. “Ethnographies of Postsocialist Change.” Progress in Human Geography 32(3): 339‒361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508089094

Suchland, Jennifer. 2011. “Is Postsocialism Transnational?” Signs 36(4): 837‒862. https://doi.org/10.1086/658899

Timár, Judit and Gábor Velkey. 2016. “The Relevance of the Political Economic Approach: The Interpretation of the Rural in the Migration Decision of Young Women and Men in an Economically Backward Region.” Journal of Rural Studies 43: 311‒322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.012

Trell, Elen-Maarja, Bettina van Hoven and Paulus Huigen. 2012. “It’s Good to Live in Järva-Jaani but We Can’t Stay Here: Youth and Belonging in Rural Estonia.” Journal of Rural Studies 28(2): 139‒148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.023

Tlostanova, Madina. 2012. “Can the Post-Soviet Think? On Coloniality of Knowledge, External Imperial and Double Colonial Difference.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 1(2): 38–58. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i2.38

Virkkunen, Joni. 2002. “Place and Discourse in the Formation of the Northeast Estonian Borderland.” Pp. 239‒254 in Boundaries and Place: European Borderlands in Geographical Context, edited by David H. Kaplan and Jouni Häkli. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Wacquant, Loïc, Tom Slater and Virgilio B. Pereira. 2014. “Territorial Stigmatization in Action.” Environment and Planning A 46(6): 1270‒1280. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4606ge

Woods, Michael. 2010. “Performing Rurality and Practicing Rural Geography.” Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 835‒846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509357356

https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2016-2-11


Crossref Cited-by (1)

Služba reprezentuje výstupy citací nakladatelů zapojených do systému Cited-by (rozšířená služba Crossref).

1. Age-Friendly Rural Areas. The Challenges of Measurement and Evaluation in Czech Older Adults
Lucie Vidovićová
Sociální studia / Social Studies  ročník: 15,  číslo: 1,  první strana: 25,  rok: 2018  
https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2018-1-25