Class, Power, and Knowledge: Toward a Broader Framework of Epistemic Justice
Online First
In examining epistemic injustice as outlined by Fricker, I highlight its conceptual shortcomings and propose a synthesis that includes class-based inequalities. Philosophical ideas and sociological theories share similar notions of power, as found in Foucault’s analysis, Fricker’s concept of epistemic justice, and Marxist critical theories. Yet discourse on epistemic injustice too often neglects the experiences of subordinated social classes, necessitating a framework that acknowledges how they are excluded.
While most research focuses on colonialism, ethnicity, and gender, class remains underexplored. Fricker argues that certain groups face discrimination through the availability of limited conceptual resources, stigmatization, and marginalization. This hinders their understanding of political conditions. If class epistemic injustice is widely condemned, do we also grant credibility to manual workers and those living in precarious circumstances?
Deliberative democracy presupposes rational communication and consensus on discussion rules, but these can exclude subjugated classes lacking the education that transmits dominant communicative skills. Consequently, they remain marginalized. A political-sociological approach would address structural inequalities and highlight the ways dominant classes sustain privilege. By acknowledging and integrating the contributions of all social class, we can build more equitable frameworks that advance our understanding of epistemic injustice across the board.
social epistemology; class; epistemic injustice; power; knowledge
Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press.
Alexander, J. C., Stack, T., & Khosrokhavar, F. (2020). Breaching the civil Order: Radicalism and the Civil Sphere. Cambridge University Press.
Allen, A. (2007). The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory. Columbia University Press.
Allen, A. (2017). Foucault and Epistemic Injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. M. Pohlhaus, Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Barnes, M. (2008). Passionate Participation: Emotional Experiences and Expressions in Deliberative Forums. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 461–481.
Campbell, S. (1994). Being Dismissed: The Politics of Emotional Expression. Hypatia, 9(3), 46–65.
Case, S. (2021). Political Conviction and Epistemic Injustice. Philosophia, 49(1), 197–216.
Eklundh, E. (2020). Excluding Emotions: The Performative Function of Populism [Dataset]. University of Salento.
Eribon, D. (1992). Michel Foucault. Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (1986a). The History of Sexuality. 2: The Use of Pleasure (2. [print.]). Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1986b). The History of Sexuality. 3: The Care of the Self (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality. 1: The Will to Knowledge. Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). Power, Right, Truth. In R. E. Goodin & P. Pettit (Eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy an Anthology. Blackwell.
Foucault, M. (2002). Truth and Power (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow & J. D. Faubion (Eds.), Essential Works of Foucault: 1954-1984. Penguin Books.
Foucault, M. (2009). Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2013). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Giladi, P. (2018). Epistemic injustice: A role for recognition? Philosophy & Social Criticism, 44(2), 141–158.
Gramsci, A. (1967). Základy politiky (J. Bezděk, Trans.). Mladá Fronta.
Gramsci, A. (1973). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Trans.). International Publishers.
Habermas, J. (2015). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Polity Press.
Ibsen, M. F. (2023). A Critical Theory of Global Justice: The Frankfurt School and World Society. Oxford University Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1998). The German Ideology: Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to The Critique of Political Economy. Prometheus Books.
Mills, C. W. (2017). Ideology. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. M. Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Mitchell, L. (2020). Participatory and Adversarial Politics. In A. Blom & S. T. Lama-Rewal (Eds.), Emotions, mobilisations and South Asian politics. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Nelson, T. E., Gwiasda, G., & Lyons, J. (2011). Vilification and Values. Political Psychology, 32(5), 813–835.
Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Cognitive Islands and Runaway Echo Chambers: Problems for Epistemic Dependence on Experts. Synthese, 197(7), 2803–2821.
Reed, I. (2011). Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences. The University of Chicago Press.
Shmidt, V. R., & Jaworsky, B. N. (2021). Historicizing Roma in Central Europe: Between Critical Whiteness and Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Vegrichtová, B. (2019). Hrozba radikalizace: Terorismus, varovné signály a ochrana společnosti. Grada.
Weber, M. (2012a). Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings (H. H. Bruun & S. Whimster, Trans.). Routledge.
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2025 Petr Zapletal