Adaptation of Teacher Power Use Scale to Lower Secondary Students and Student Teachers

Kateřina Vlčková; Jan Mareš; Stanislav Ježek

doi:10.5817/PedOr2015-6-798

Adaptation of Teacher Power Use Scale to Lower Secondary Students and Student Teachers

Vol.25,No.6(2015)
ENGLISH ISSUE

Kateřina Vlčková Jan Mareš Stanislav Ježek

https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2015-6-798

PDF

Abstract

Power can be defined as an ability to influence opinions, values, and behaviour of others. The realisation of curricular aims is enabled by clearly established power relationships in classes. Newly qualified teachers often struggle with establishing power relationships. French and Raven’s influential typology of social power as a relational phenomenon distinguishes coercive, reward, legitimate, referent, and expert bases of teacher power. In our methodological study we adapted Teacher Power Use Scale – TPUS (Schrodt, Witt, & Turman, 2007) that measures these power bases. The adaptation focuses (instead of tertiary teachers, their students, and Anglo-Saxon context) on student teachers, lower secondary students, and reflects the Czech sociocultural context. The non-probability adaptation sample consists of 1686 students from 96 lower secondary classes taught by 96 student teachers during their long term teaching practice. Our data basically support French and Raven’s theory and the original TPUS, except that the structure of student teacher power bases seems to be naturally simpler in the perception of lower secondary students. Above all, legitimate and coercive student teachers power bases were strongly inter-correlated, i.e. perceived by students as one factor; similar to teacher power bases structure in other Czech data

Keywords:
power bases; Teacher Power Use Scale; student teachers; lower secondary education; scale adaptation; confirmatory factor analysis

References

Aultman, L. P., Williams-Johnson, M. R., & Schutz, P. A. (2009). Boundary dilemmas in teacher-student relationships: Struggling with “the line“. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.002

Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor and Francis.

Blížkovský, B., Kučerová, S., Kurelová M. et al. (2000). Středoevropský učitel. [Central European teacher]. Brno: Konvoj.

Buzzelli, C., & Johnston, B. (2001). Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X%2801%2900037-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00037-3

Elias, S. M., & Loomis, R. J. (2004). The effect of instructor gender and race/ethnicity on gaining compliance in the classroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02578.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02578.x

Elias, S. M., & Mace Britton, L. (2005). Social power in the classroom: Student power in the classroom: Student attribution for compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8), 1738–1754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02193.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02193.x

Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.

French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 259–269). New York: Harper & Row.

Golish, T. D. (1999). Students’ use of compliance gaining strategies with graduate teaching assistants: Examining the other end of the power spectrum. Communication Quarterly, 47, 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370121">https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370121

Golish, T. D., & Olson, L. N. (2000). Students’ use of power in the classroom: An investigation of student power, teacher power, and teacher immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385598">https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385598

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jacobs, G. (2012). Models of power and the deletion of participation in a classroom literacy event. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01470.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01470.x

Jamieson, D. W., & Thomas, K. W. (1974). Power and conflict in the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637401000304">https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637401000304

Kantek, F., & Gezer, N. (2010). Faculty members’ use of power: Midwifery students’ perceptions and expectations. Midwifery, 26, 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.003

Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom IV: Alternatives to discipline. Communication Yearbook, 8, 724–746.

Lojdová, K. (2015). Legitimní moc aneb vypůjčená role učitele. [Legitimate power or borrowed teacher’s role]. In K. Vlčková & K. Lojdová, et al. (2015), Z posluchárny za katedru: mocenské vztahy ve výuce studentů učitelství [From a Lecture Hall to a Teacher’s Desk: Power Relations in Student Teacher Classes]. Brno: Munipress.

Mareš, J., Vlčková, K., & Ježek, S., et al. (2016, in print). Báze moci: Manuál k nástroji. Brno: Munipress.

McCroskey, J. C., et al. (2006). An introduction to communication in the classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32(2), 175–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528309378527">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528309378527

Moscovici, H. (2007). Mirror, mirrors on the wall, who is the most powerful of all? A self-study analysis of power relationships in science methods courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1370–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20204">https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20204

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide (Version 7.11). Muthén and Muthén. PMCid:PMC3135722.

Myers, S. A. (1999). The relationship between college student challenge behaviour and instructor power. Speech and Theatre Association of Missouri Journal, 28, 8–17.

Özer, N., Uğurlu, T., Sincar, M., Yildirim, M. C., & Beycioğlu, K. (2014). Teacher power use in the college classroom: Turkish students’ views. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2589–2592.

Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528609388318">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528609388318

Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217–244.

Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01191.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01191.x

Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378801">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378801

Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528409384729">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528409384729

Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (Eds.). (1992). Power in the classroom. communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Davis, L. M., & Koontz, K. A. (1980). Perceived power as a mediator of management communication style and employee satisfaction: A preliminary investigation. Communication Quarterly, Fall, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378009369380">https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378009369380

Roach, K. D. (1995a). Teaching assistant argumentativeness and perceptions of power use in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 12, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099509362044">https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099509362044

Roach, K. D. (1995b). Teaching assistant argumentativeness: Effects of affective learning and student perceptions of power use. Communication Education, 44(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378994">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378994

Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L, & Turman, P. D. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701256062">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701256062

Schultz, B. D., & Oyler, C. (2006). We make this road as we walk together: Sharing teacher authority in a social action curriculum project. Curiculum Inquiry, 36(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00365.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00365.x

Simmel, G. (1896). Superiority and subordination as subject-matter of sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 2(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1086/210600">https://doi.org/10.1086/210600

Staton, A. Q. (1992). Teacher and student concern and classroom power and control. In V. Richmond & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom (pp. 159–176). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Student, K. R. (1968). Supervisory influence and work-group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025886">https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025886

Šalamounová, Z., & Švaříček, R. (2012). Komunikace z pohledu učitelů [Communication from the teachers’ point of view]. In K. Šeďová, R. Švaříček, & Z. Šalamounová, Komunikace ve školní třídě [Communication in the classroom] (pp. 215–228). Praha: Portál.

Šalamounová, Z., Bradová, J., & Lojdová, K. (2014). Mocenské vztahy mezi začínajícími učiteli a jejich žáky. [Power relations between novice teachers and students]. Pedagogická orientace, 24(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2014-3-375">https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2014-3-375

Šeďová, K. (2011). Mocenské konstelace ve výukové komunikaci [Constellations of power in educational communication]. Studia Paedagogica, 16(1), 89–118.

Tauber, R. (1999). Classroom management: Sound theory and effective practice. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

Turman, P. D., & Schrodt, P. (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600702570">https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600702570

Veenman, S. (1987). On becoming a teacher: An analysis of initial training. Paper presented at Conference on Education of the World Rasque Congress, Bilbao.

Vlčková, K., Lojdová, K., Lukas, J., Mareš, J., Šalamounová, Z., Kohoutek, T., Bradová, J., & Ježek, S. (2015). Z posluchárny za katedru: mocenské vztahy ve výuce studentů učitelství [From a Lecture Hall to a Teacher’s Desk: Power Relations in Student Teacher Classes]. Brno: Munipress.

Vlčková, K., Mareš, J., Ježek, S., & Šalamounová, Z. (2016, in print). Báze moci používané učitelem ve školní třídě: česká adaptace dotazníku Teacher Power Use Scale [Power bases used by teacher in the classroom: Czech adaptation of Teacher Power Use Scale]. Pedagogika.

Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.

Metrics