School emphasis on academic success in TIMSS 2011 as a window on curricular reform in the Czech Republic

Vol.25,No.4(2015)

Abstract
TIMSS 2011 study uses new index (SEAS) that is closely related to the concept of academic optimism. This paper describes some causes and ramifications of the low level of SEAS and its components in the Czech Republic. Besides, the SEAS components are used to analyse the relationships between the attitudes of the Czech schools to the curricular reform and achievement of their pupils. Introductory part of the paper describes the concept of academic optimism and the SEAS index in TIMSS 2011. Subsequently, explorative secondary analysis of TIMSS data is performed to explain strikingly low level of SEAS in Czech Republic. The results are discussed in the regional perspective. The data on results of Czech 4th grade pupils in TIMSS 2011 mathematics test and school questionnaires were analysed by basic descriptive and inferential statistics methods. The low level of SEAS in the Czech Republic is mainly due to the low perceived pupils' desire to do well in the school. One explanation may be the low trust of teachers and principals to pupils. The analysis also shows paradoxical relationship between the declared support to the reform and pupils' achievement in the Czech schools. The components of the SEAS may be interpreted as a window on the perception and implementation of curricular reform in the Czech Republic.

Keywords:
school emphasis on academic success; academic optimism; curricular reform; Czech Republic; TIMSS 2011
References

Balada, J., Brant, J., Brychnáčová, E., Herink, J., Holasová, T., Horská, V., & Zahradníková, M. (2007). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. Praha: VÚP.

Bellman, J., & Weiß, M. (2009). Risiken und Nebenwirkungen neuer Steuerung im Schulsystem. Theoretische Konzeptualisierung und Erklärungsmodelle. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55(2), 286–308.

Bibou-Nakou, I., Tsiantis, J., Assimopoulos, H., Chatzilambou, P., & Giannakopoulou, D. (2012). School factors related to bullying: A qualitative study of early adolescent students. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9179-1

Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. Washington: World Bank Publications.

Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness. Abingdon: Routledge.

ČŠI (2013). Vybraná zjištění PIRLS 2011 a TIMSS 2011. Praha: Česká školní inspekce.

de Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701366207

Dvořák, D. (2012). Od osnov k vzdělávacím standardům. Praha: Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze.

Dvořák, D., Starý, K., & Urbánek, P. (2015). Malá škola po pěti letech: Proměny školy v době reformy. Pedagogická orientace, 25(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2015-1-9

Dvořák, D., Urbánek, P., & Starý, K., (2014). High autonomy and low accountability. Case study of five Czech schools. Pedagogická orientace, 24(6), 919–940. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2014-6-919

Eurydice (2009). National testing of pupils in Europe: Objectives, organisation and use of results. Brussels: Education, audiovisual and culture executive agency.

Gavora, P. (2008). Učiteľovo vnímanie svojej profesijnej zdatnosti (self-efficacy). Prehľad problematiky. Pedagogika, 58(3), 222–235.

Hloušková, L. (2008). Proměna kultury školy v pedagogických diskurzech. Brno: Filozofická fakulta MU.

Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state of the art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281.

Hoy, W. (2012). School characteristics that make a difference for the achievement of all students: A 40‐year odyssey. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211196078

Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003425

Janík, T. (2013). Od reformy kurikula k produktivní kultuře vyučování a učení. Pedagogická orientace, 23(5), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-5-634

Křivohlavý, J. (2004). Pozitivní psychologie: odpouštění, smiřování, překonávání negativních emocí, radost, naděje. Praha: Portál.

Lee, M., & Friedrich, T. (2011). Continuously reaffirmed, subtly accommodated, obviously missing and fallaciously critiqued: Ideologies in UNESCO's lifelong learning policy. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2010.547619

Mareš, J. (2001). Zvládání školní zátěže u žáků a studentů. In J. Čáp & J. Mareš (Eds.), Psychologie pro učitele (s. 527–563). Praha: Portál.

Marsh, H. W, Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x

Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Mullis, I. V., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2013). Effective schools in reading, mathematics, and science at the fourth grade. In M. O. Martin & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—implications for early learning (s. 109–178). Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria: Association for supervision and curriculum development.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Olson, J., Preuschoff, C., & Erberber, E. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International mathematics report. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson. J. E. (2014). School emphasis on academic success: Exploring changes in science performance in Norway between 2007 and 2011 employing two-level SEM. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(4), 308–327.

Píšová, M., Kostková, K., Janík, T., Doulík, P., Hajdušková, L., Knecht, P., … Vlček, P. (2011). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích. Případové studie tvorby kurikula. Praha: VÚP.

Redding, S. (2006). The mega system. Deciding. Learning. Connecting. Lincoln: Academic development institute.

Rendl, M., & Štech, S. (2012). Should learning (mathematics) at school aim at knowledge or at competences? Orbis Scholae, 6(2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2015.38

Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197–230.

Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis. London: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y

Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000135049

Tomášek, V., Kramplová, I., & Palečková, J. (2012). Národní zpráva TIMSS 2011. Praha: Česká školní inspekce.

UNESCO (2007). Global monitoring report 2008: Education for all by 2015. Will we make it. Paris: UNESCO.

Metrics

0


1171

Views

358

PDF (Čeština) views