The quality of peer-feedback in inquiry activities in Human biology lessons
Vol.29,No.1(2019)
The paper is focused on quality of peer feedback on solution of inquiry task from Human biology lesson. The main aim of this study is to compare the peerassessment and assessment performed by teacher and researcher as well as to review the provided feedback, its content, elaboration or emotional dimension. In total, 15 pupils from lower-secondary level and 30 pupils from grammar school (the same grade as the first group of pupils) were involved in this study. Pupils filled the protocol which was assessed by their peers who also provided them the written feedback.
We used coding tool for analysis of provided feedback and we found out that the assessors tried to write the feedback to their peers in most of cases and they tried to advise them how to improve their present work. The poor experience with inquiry tasks is the problem because it influences also the ability to provide the feedback. It leads to pupils’ uncertainty in formulating the advices how to improve original protocol, mainly in relation to assessment of design of own experiment. The pupils have also problem with using the descriptive language and they are not able to express their ideas and suggestions. This fact can lead to failure to provide the adequate written commentary. It was found that the discussion during formulating the feedback is very effective way to clarify pupils’ ideas about the right solution of the task and pupils also proved their ability to work with own mistake.
formativní hodnocení; vrstevnické hodnocení; písemná zpětná vazba; badatelsky orientované vyučování; biologie; projekt ASSIST-ME
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal
of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational
Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 21(5), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Black, P. (2005). Formative assessment: Views through different lenses. Curriculum Journal,
16(2), 133–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135889">https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135889
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education:
Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom
assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 80(2), 139–148.
Blažek, R. (2017). Publikace s uvolněnými úlohami z mezinárodního šetření PISA 2015. Praha:
Česká školní inspekce.
Blažek, R., & Příhodová, S. (2016). Mezinárodní šetření PISA 2015: národní zpráva – přírodovědná
gramotnost. Praha: Česká školní inspekce.
Brown, S. (2004). Assessment for learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 81–89.
Brusenbauch Meislová, M., Daniel, S., Folwarczný, R., Hájek, O., Lebeda, T., Lysek, J., … Žídková, M.
(2018). Vliv složení třídy, metod uplatňovaných učitelem a využívání technologií na výsledky
českých žáků – sekundární analýza PISA 2015. Praha: Česká školní inspekce.
Buck, B. L., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the
undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52–58.
Carless, D., Salter, D., Min, Y., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449">https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2),
137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135921">https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135921
Čapek, R. (2015). Moderní didaktika: lexikon výukových a hodnoticích metod. Praha: Grada.
Činčera, J. (2013). Badatelé.cz: evaluační zpráva. Liberec: Technická Univerzita.
Dostál, J. (2015). Badatelsky orientovaná výuka: pojetí, podstata, význam a přínosy. Olomouc:
Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham:
Open University Press.
Ducasse, A. M., & Hill, K. (2019). Developing student feedback literacy using educational technology and the reflective feedback conversation. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 12(1), 24–37.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington: National Academies Press.
Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as Learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Evans, R. H., Ropohl, M., Nielsen, J. A., & Papadouris, N. (2016). Affordances and challenges of written feedback as formative assessment in inquiry-based STEM education. Abstract from NARST Conference, Baltimore, USA.
Ewers, T. G. (2001). Teacher-directed versus learning cycles methods: Effects on science process
skills mastery and teacher efficacy among elementary education students. (Dissertation
thesis.) Moscow: University of Idaho.
Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (Eds.). (2007). Formative and summative assessments in the classroom. Dostupné z https://www.amle.org/portals/0/pdf/articles/Formative_Assessment_Article_Aug2013.pdf
Grandy, R. E. (1997). Constructivism and objectivity: Disentangling metaphysics from pedagogy. Science & Education, 6(1–2), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008665913766">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008665913766
Harlen, W., & Allende, J. (2009). Teacher professional development in pre-secondary school inquiry-based science education (IBSE). Santiago: University of Chile.
Hattie, J. A. C., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487">https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Chappuis, S., & Chappuis, J. (2008). The best value in formative assessment. Informative Assessment, 65(4), 14–19.
Koenig, J. A. (Ed.). (2011). Assessing 21st century skills. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Kolář, Z., & Šikulová, R. (2009). Hodnocení žáků. Praha: Grada.
Le Hebel, F., Constantinou, C. P., Hospesova, A., Grob, R., Holmeier, M., Montpied, P., … Zlabkova, I. (2018). Students’ perspectives on peer assessment. In J. Dolin & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming Assessment. Contribution from Science Research 4 (s. 141–174). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Millar, R., & Abrahams, I. (2009). Practical work: Making it more effective. School Science Review, 91(334), 59–64.
Nelešovská, A. (2005). Pedagogická komunikace v teorii a praxi. Praha: Grada.
Nieminen, P., Correia, C. F., Hähkiöniemi, M., Serret, N., Viiri, J., & Harrison, Ch. (2016). Formative assessment in inquiry-based science education using interactions on-the-fly. Abstract from NARST Conference, Baltimore, USA.
Papáček, M. (2010a, březen). Limity a šance zavádění badatelsky orientovaného vyučování přírodopisu a biologie v České republice. In M. Papáček (Ed.), Didaktika biologie v České republice 2010 a badatelsky orientované vyučování (DiBi 2010) (s. 145–162). České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích. Pedagogická fakulta.
Papáček, M. (2010b). Badatelsky orientované přírodovědné vyučování – cesta pro biologické vzdělávání generací Y, Z a alfa? Scientia in educatione, 1(1), 33–49.
Pasch, M., Gardner, T. G., Langerová, G. M., Starková, A. J., & Moodyová, Ch. D. (2005). Od vzdělávacího programu k vyučovací hodině. Praha: Portál.
Petr, J. (2014). Možnosti využití úloh z biologické olympiády ve výuce přírodopisu a biologie – inspirace pro badatelsky orientované vyučování. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta.
Petr, J., Ditrich, T., Závodská, R., & Papáček, M. (2015). Inquiry based biology education in the Czech Republic: A reflection of five years dissemination. In K. Maaß, B. Barzel, G. Törner, D. Wernish, D. Schäfer, & K. Reiz-Konzebovski (Eds.), Education the Educators: International Approaches to Scaling-up Professional Development in Mathematic and Science Education (s. 118–124). Münster: WTM – Verlag für wissenschaftliche Texte und Medien.
Petty, G. (2013). Moderní vyučování. Praha: Portál.
Radvanová, S. (2017). Efektivita vybraných vzdělávacích postupů ve výuce biologie. (Dizertační práce.) Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta.
Radvanová, S., Čížková, V., & Martinková, P. (2018). Mění se pohled učitelů na badatelsky orientovanou výuku? Scientia in educatione, 9(1), 81–103.
Rokos, L. (2017). Hodnocení badatelsky orientované výuky biologie. (Dizertační práce.) České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta.
Rokos, L., & Lišková, J. (2018). Simulace určení krevních skupin. Biologie – Chemie – Zeměpis, 27(2), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2018.2.1">https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2018.2.1
Rokos, L., & Vomáčková, V. (2017). Hodnocení efektivity badatelsky orientovaného vyučování v laboratorních pracích při výuce fyziologie člověka na základní škole a nižším stupni gymnázia. Scientia in educatione, 8(1), 32–45.
Rokos, L., Závodská, R., Petr, J., & Papáček, M. (2016). Formative assessment methods in biology education: Pedagogical study at primary school in the Czech Republic. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Education, Educational Sciences, 8(4), 94–99.
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351">https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
Ryplová, R., & Reháková, J. (2011). Přínos badatelsky orientovaného vyučování (BOV) pro environmentální výchovu: případová studie implementace BOV do výuky na ZŠ. Envigogika, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.65">https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.65
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 70–74.
Sivan, A. (2010). The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 193–213.
Slavík, J. (1999). Hodnocení v současné škole. Praha: Portál.
Sluijsman, D., & Prins, F. (2006). A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.01.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.01.005
Starý, K. et al. (2016). Formativní hodnocení ve výuce. Praha: Portál.
Stuchlíková, I. (2010, březen). O badatelsky orientovaném vyučování. In Papáček, M. (Ed.), Didaktika biologie v České republice 2010 a badatelsky orientované vyučování (DiBi 2010) (s. 129–135). České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích. Pedagogická fakulta.
Stuchlíková, I., & Janík, T. (Eds.) (2015). Oborové didaktiky: vývoj, stav, perspektivy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Stuchlíková, I., Hošpesová, A., Papáček, M., Petr, J., Rokos, L., Závodská, R., & Žlábková, I. (2017). Formative peer-assessment in biology and mathematics inquiry lessons by Czech students. Abstracts from ESERA 2017 Conference, Dublin, Irsko.
Šeďová, K., Švaříček, R., & Šalamounová, Z. (2012). Komunikace ve školní třídě. Praha: Portál.
Škoda, J. & Doulík, P. (2009). Vývoj paradigmat přírodovědného vzdělávání. Pedagogická
orientace, 19(3), 24–44.
Škoda, J., Doulík, P., Bílek, M., & Šimonová, I. (2015). The efficiency of inquiry-based science instruction in relation to the learners’ motivation types. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(6), 791–803.
Škoda, J., Pečivová, M., & Doulík, P. (2003). The importance of illustrative presentations in teaching chemistry by applying constructivist methods. In M. Bílek (Ed.), Visualization in science and technical education (s. 13–19). Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780">https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780
Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923195">https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923195
Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221–230.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K-12 classrooms. West Palm Beach: Learning Sciences International.
Wren, D. G., & Cotton, J. A. (2008). Using formative assessment to increase learning. Research Brief: Report From The Department Of Research, Evaluation, And Assessment, 1, 1–8.
Xu, F., & Kushnir, T. 2013. Infants are rational constructivist learners. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469396">https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469396
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2019 Lukáš Rokos, Jana Lišková