Practices used by teachers in relation to errors during whole class interaction

Vol.28,No.3(2018)

Abstract
The goal of the research is to identify practices which are chosen by teacher because of pupils’ error. The research is focused on the practices that relate to errors made during whole class interaction. A definition of error and a concept development is introduced in theory. Further, the paper deals with teacher error management behaviour. The research is qualitative, and methods of observation and interviews were used. The data was collected in ninth class of elementary school in the Czech language. The result of research is definition of four practices which are part of dealing with errors. The first two procedures represent the way of teacher’s reaction to error. They are characterized as an adaptive reaction to error and a relativization of wrong answer. The other two teachers’ procedures influence the meaning of error in the social environment of the classroom. They are named as a prevention from error for selected pupils and a minimization of negative conception of an error.

Keywords:
error; mistake; teachers’ practices; error management behaviour; dealing with errors; pedagogical communication; whole class interaction
References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Babad, E. (2005). Guessing teachers’ differential treatment of high-and low-achievers from thin slices of their public lecturing behaviour. Journal Of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-005-2744-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-005-2744-y

Babiaková, S. (2012). Komparácia profesijných činností slovenských, českých a poľských učiteľov na primárnom stupni školy. Pedagogická orientace, 22(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2012-2-222">https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2012-2-222

Borasi, R. (1994). Capitalizing on errors as "Springboards for Inquiry": A teaching experiment. Journal For Research In Mathematics Education, 25(2), 166–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/749507">https://doi.org/10.2307/749507

Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers' beliefs and knowledge on error-handling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal For Research In Mathematics Education, 42(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0002">https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0002

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. New York: Oxford university press.

Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Grassinger, R., & Dresel, M. (2017). Who learns from errors on a class test? Antecedents and profiles of adaptive reactions to errors in a failure situation. Learning And Individual Differences, 53, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.009

Harding, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis from start to finish. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Harteis, C., Bauer, J., & Heid, H. (2012). Human Fallibility. Dordrecht: Springer.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review Of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487">https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hendl, J. (2005). Kvalitativní výzkum: základní metody a aplikace. Praha: Portál.

Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2011). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. John Wiley & Sons.

Hoffmannová, J. (2017). In P. Karlík, M. Nekula, & J. Pleskalová (Eds.), CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Dostupné z https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/INSTITUCIONÁLNÍ DIALOG

Hudecová, D. (2004). Revize Bloomovy taxonomie edukačních cílů. Pedagogika, 54(3), 274–283.

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal Of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100">https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100

Ingram, J., Pitt, A., & Baldry, F. (2015). Handling errors as they arise in whole-class interactions. Research In Mathematics Education, 17(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1098562">https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1098562

Jelínek, M. (2001). Co je to jazyková chyba? In K. Klímová, & H. Kneselová (Eds.), Profesor Hauser jubilující: sborník příspěvků ze semináře konaného 10. 4. 2001 při příležitosti 80. narozenin prof. PhDr. Přemysla Hausera, CSc. (s. 75–85). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Kalová, S. (2018). Úloha chyb, korektivní zpětné vazby a normy v cizojazyčné výuce s důrazem na výuku angličtiny. Pedagogická orientace, 28(1), 72–110. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-1-72">https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-1-72

Kosíková, V., & Černá, K. (2013). Výzkum kvality informační funkce hodnocení ve středoškolské praxi. Pedagogika, 63(3), 372–393.

Křivohlavý, J., & Mareš, J. (1995). Komunikace ve škole. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Kulič, V. (1971). Chyba a učení: funkce chybného výkonu v učení a v jeho řízení. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.

Matteucci, M. C., Corazza, M., & Santagata, R. (2015). Learning from errors, or not: An analysis of teachers' beliefs about errors and error-handling strategies through questionnaire and video. Dostupné z https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/42369304/Pre_print_Matteucci_Corazza_Santagata_Novascience_Chapter.ID_33975_7x10.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1537531031&Signature=zPhsm8emMTbceQJhnG3HWQtbP%2F8%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DLEARNING_FROM_ERRORS_OR_NOT._AN_ANALYSIS.pdf

Nekvapil, J., & Havlík, M. (2007). Replika v rozhovoru. In P. Karlík & J. Plesková (Eds.), CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Dostupné z https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/ STŘÍDÁNÍ REPLIK MLUVČÍCH V ROZHOVORU

Ondráková, J. (2014). Chyba a výuka cizích jazyků. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.

Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. New York: Routledge.

Průcha, J., Walterová, E., & Mareš, J. (2003). Pedagogický slovník. Praha: Portál.

Santagata, R. (2005). Practices and beliefs in mistake-handling activities: A video study of Italian and US mathematics lessons Teaching And Teacher Education, 21(5), 491–508.

Seifried, J., & Wuttke, E. (2010). Student errors: How teachers diagnose and respond to them Empirical Research In Vocational Education And Training, 2(2), 147–162.

Schleppenbach, M., Flevares, L., Sims, L., & Perry, M. (2007). Teachers’ responses to student mistakes in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.1086/525551">https://doi.org/10.1086/525551

Slavík, J. (1994). Problém chyby v tvořivě výrazové výchově. Pedagogika, 44(2), 119–128.

Slavík, J. (1999). Hodnocení v současné škole: východiska a nové metody pro praxi. Praha: Portál.

Slavík, J. (2003). Autonomní a heteronomní pojetí školního hodnocení – aktuální problém pedagogické teorie a praxe. Pedagogika, 54(1), 5–25.

Starý, K., & Laufková, V. (2016). Formativní hodnocení ve výuce. Praha: Portál.

Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. E. (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2015). A constructive error climate as an element of effective learning environments. Psychological Test And Assessment Modeling, 57(2), 262–275.

Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G., & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002

Šeďová, K., & Šalamounová, Z. (2015). Žákovská participace na komunikaci jako produkt interakcí mezi učitelem a žákem. Lifelong Learning / Celozivotní Vzdelávání, 5(3), 75–94.

Šeďová, K., & Švaříček, R. (2010). Zamlčené hodnocení: Zpětná vazba ve výukové komunikaci na druhém stupni základní školy. Studia Paedagogica, 15(2), 61–86.

Šeďová, K., & Švaříček, R. (2012). Feedback in educational communication in Czech secondary schools. Educational Assessment, Evaluation And Accountability, 24(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9144-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9144-8

Švaříček, R., & Šeďová, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál.

Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Tulis, M. (2013). Error management behavior in classrooms: Teachers' responses to student mistakes. Teaching And Teacher Education, 33, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.003

Tulis, M., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2016). Learning from errors: A model of individual processes. Frontline Learning Research, 4(2), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.168">https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.168

Tůma, F. (2016). Konverzační analýza a interakce ve třídě: východiska a metodologické aspekty. Pedagogická orientace, 26(3), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2016-3-415">https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2016-3-415

Tůma, F. (2017). Interakce ve výuce anglického jazyka na vysoké škole pohledem konverzační analýzy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Willemsen, A., N., Gosen, M., van Braak, M., Koole, T., & de Glopper, K. (2018). Teachers’ open invitations in whole-class discussions. Linguistics And Education, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.001

Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.

Zander, L., Kreutzmann, M., & Wolter, I. (2014). Constructive handling of mistakes in the classroom: The conjoint power of collaborative networks and self-efficacy beliefs. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(5), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0558-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0558-6

Zeman, J. (2013). Verbální a neverbální prostředky v komunikaci mládeže. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.

Metrics

0


2302

Views

897

PDF (Čeština) views