Curricular reform in Slovakia regarding the attitudes of basic school teachers

Štefan Porubský; Marian Trnka; Vladimír Poliach; Radka Cachovanová

doi:10.5817/PedOr2015-6-777

Curricular reform in Slovakia regarding the attitudes of basic school teachers

Bd.25,Nr.6(2015)
ENGLISH ISSUE

Štefan Porubský Marian Trnka Vladimír Poliach Radka Cachovanová

https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2015-6-777

PDF (Englisch)

Abstract

In 2008, a curricular reform was begun in Slovakia. It focused on introducing a two-level model of curriculum at pre-primary, primary and secondary schools. The reform has been met with mixed reactions from teachers and school administration staff. Our paper provides brief information on the nature of this reform, the content of the reform curricular documents and some of the results of a questionnaire survey regarding the attitudes of teachers in basic schools (primary and lower secondary level of education) towards the reform. Their ratings are examined in three areas: satisfaction with the development of the Slovak school system in the last six years, the importance of curricular changes and the effect of these changes.

Schlagworte:
educational policy; curricular reform; teacher attitudes; basic school

Literaturhinweise

Anderson, R. D. (1995). Curriculum Reform: Dilemmas and Promise. Phi Delta Kappa International Stable, 77(1), 33–36.

Anderson, R. D., Anderson, B. L., Varnaka-Martin, M. A., Romagnano, L., Bielenberg, J., Flory, M., Mieras, B., & Whitworth, J. (1994). Issues of curriculum reform in science, mathematics and higher order thinking across the disciplines. The Curriculum Reform Project, University of Colorado. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Brown, M. A. (1980). Attitudes and social categories: complementary explanations of innovation-adoption behavior. Environment and Planning A, 12(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1068/a120175">https://doi.org/10.1068/a120175

Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Brundrett, M., Duncan, D. & Rhodes, C. (2010). Leading curriculum innovation in primary schools project: An interim report on school leaders' roles in curriculum development in England. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 38(4), 403–419.

Brundrett, M., & Duncan, D. (2011). Leading curriculum innovation in primary school. Management in Education, 25(3), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020610387957">https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020610387957

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (2008). US school reform and classroom practice. In C. Sugrue (Ed.), The future of educational change (pp. 75–88). London: Routledge.

Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2010). A bridge between worlds: understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5

Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teacher College Press.

Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M. & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science eduction reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291098-2736%28199611%2933:9%3C971::AID-TEA2%3E3.0.CO;2-S">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S

Hargreaves, A. (2008). The fourth way of change: Towards an age of inspiration and sustainability. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars (pp. 11–40). Toronto: Solution Tree.

Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change overtime? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05277975">https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05277975

Ho, D. CH. W. (2010). Teacher participation in curriculum and pedagogical decisions: Insights into curriculum leadership. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 38(5), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210373739">https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210373739

Janík, T., Janko, T., Knecht, P., Kubiatko, M., Najvar, P., Pavlas, T., Slavík, J., Solnička, D., & Vlčková, K. (2010a). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích: výsledky dotazníkového šetření [The curriculum reform at grammar school: Questionnaire survey; in Czech]. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický v Praze.

Janík, T., Knecht, P., Najvar, P., Pavlas, T., Slavík, J., & Solnička, D. (2010b). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích v rozhovorech s koordinátory pilotních a partnerských škol [The curriculum reform at gymnasium: Interviews with coordinators at pilot and partner schools; in Czech]. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický v Praze.

Kennedy, C. (1996). Teacher roles in curriculum reform. ELTED, 2(1), 77–89.

Kennedy, C., & Kennedy, J. (1996). Teacher attitudes and change implementation. System, 24(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X%2896%2900027-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(96)00027-9

Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270010016874">https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270010016874

Lee, J. Ch-K., & Yin, H-B. (2011). Teachers’ emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9149-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9149-3

Levitt, K. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042">https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042

Mouraz, A., Leite, C., & Fernandes, P. (2013). Teachers’ role in curriculum design in Portuguese schools. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 19(5), 478–491.

Mutch, C. (2012). Curriculum change and teacher resistance. Curriculum Matters, 8(1), 1–8.

Pimley, G. (2011). Curriculum autonomy through curriculum expertise. Forum for promoting comprehensive education, 53(1), 93–99.

Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9140-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9140-z

Sahlberg, P. (2009). Learning first. School accountablity for sustainable society. In D. G. Kenneth, L. S. Brenda, & J-C. Couture (Eds.), Education Accountability. Proffesional voices from the field (pp. 1–22). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736%28200102%2938:2%3C137::AID-TEA1001%3E3.0.CO;2-U">https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U

Wu, S. M. (2015). Development and application of the measures of school value, teacher. The New Educational Review, 39(1), 240–250.

Zákon č. 245/2008 Z.z. z 22. mája 2008 o výchove a vzdelávaní (školský zákon). [Education Act No. 245/2008]. Available: https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/9287.pdf.

Metriky