The impact of marketisation on undergraduate curriculum in an English university: A Bernsteinian analysis
Bd.24,Nr.6(2014)
ENGLISH ISSUE
The context for this paper is the marketisation of higher education in England since the 1990s which has established the core mission of the university as primarily economic. Successive government policies have framed this mission as the generation of ‘useful’ knowledge and the supply of skilled graduates required by companies to compete in the ‘global economic race’. Higher education in the UK is now driven by a dynamic in which universities are required to compete for students in a quasimarket characterised by growing stratification and reduced state funding. This paper examines the impact of these changes in a case study of undergraduate curriculum in a university Business School. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with academics who taught on undergraduate programmes together with a documentary analysis of texts such as module specifications, programme review documents and Business School strategy. Bernstein’s pedagogic theory and in particular his concept of recontextualisation was utilised to interpret the findings. It was found that market imperatives relating to the maximisation of income generation dominate the discourse in the Business School. As a result, pedagogical relations have become recontextualised as a form of product management accompanied by a range of unintended consequences.
curriculum; pedagogy; marketisation; discourse; Bernstein
Ainley, P. (2004). The new ‘market-state’ and education. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227519">https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227519
Allen, M., & Ainley, P. (Eds.). (2013). Education beyond the coalition: Reclaiming the agenda. Retrieved from radicaledbks.com.
Alvesson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness: Consumption, higher education and work organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
Bernstein, B. (1973). Class, codes and control, vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brady, N. (2012). From ‘Moral Loss’ to ‘Moral Reconstruction’ A critique of ethical perspectives in challenging the neoliberal hegemony in UK universities in the 21st century. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.698987">https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.698987
Browne, J. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education: An independent review of higher education funding & student finance. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/hereview.independent.gov.uk/hereview/report/.
Daily Telegraph. (2014). The complete university guide. Retrieved from thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings.
Daniels, H. (2006). Activity, discourse and pedagogic change. In R. Moore, M. Arnot, J. Beck, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Knowledge, power and educational reform: Applying the sociology of Basil Bernstein (pp. 163–178). London: Routledge
Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. London: HMSO. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2002). 14–19: Extending opportunities and raising standards: Summary guide. London: Stationery Office.
DBIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2010). A strategy for sustainable growth. Retrieved from http://interactive.bis.gov.uk/comment/growth/files/2010/07/8782-BISSustainable-Growth_WEB.pdf.
Entwistle, N. (1996). Recent research on student learning. In J. Tait & P. Knight (Eds.), The management of independent learning (pp. 97–112). London: Kogan Page.
ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council). (2008). Widening participation in higher education: A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Retrieved from http://www.tlrp.org/pub/documents/HEcomm.pdf.
Further and higher education act. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/13.
Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalisation, lifelong learning and the learning society: Sociological perspectives.Oxon: Routledge.
Lauder, H., Young, M., Daniels, H., Balarin, M., & Lowe, J. (2012). Educating for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.
Leitch, S. L. (2006). Review of skills. Prosperity for all in the global economy – world class skills. Final report. Retrieved from http://www.ggpg.org.uk/governance-and-fe-system/leitchreport.html.
McArdle-Clinton, D. (2008). The consumer experience of higher education: The rise of capsule education. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Molesworth, M., Scullion, R., & Nixon, E. (2011). The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. Oxon: Routledge.
Naidoo, R. (2011). Rethinking development: Higher education and the new imperialism. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalisation and higher education (pp. 40–58). Cheltenham: Edwin Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Nixon, J. (2008). Towards the virtuous university: The moral bases of academic practice. Oxon: Routledge.
Pearson Education Ltd. (2014). BTEC. Retrieved from http://www.edexcel.com/btec/Pages/default.aspx.
QAA (Quality Assurance Agency). (2007). Subject benchmark statements: General business and management. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/GeneralBusinessManagement.pdf.
Sadovnik, A. R. (2001). Basil Bernstein (1924–2000). Prospects: The quarterly review of comparative education, 31(4), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03220044">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03220044
Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (2000). The politics of governance in higher education: The case of quality assurance. Political Studies, 48(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00251">https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00251
Scott, P. (1995). The globalization of higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000038422">https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000038422
Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. London: Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
Young, M. (2012). The curriculum – ‘An entitlement to powerful knowledge’: A response to John White. New visions for education. Retrieved from http://www.newvisionsforeducation.org.uk/2012/05/03/the-curriculum-%E2%80%98an-entitlement-to-powerfulknowledge%E2%80%99-a-response-to-john-white/
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
Copyright (c) 2015 Norman Brady, Agnieszka Bates