Dvojí výjimečnost z pohledu zahraničních studií
Vol.31,No.4(2021)
The review deals with twice exceptionality – a combination of high cognitive giftedness and specific learning disabilities. In the framework of the review study, 10 research studies dealing with the concept of twice exceptionality in the years 2010–2019 were analysed. The diagnostic process of twice exceptionality consists of the diagnostics of cognitive giftedness and the diagnostics of specific learning disabilities. Cognitive giftedness is most often diagnosed using intelligence tests and curriculum-based tests. The diagnostics of specific learning disabilities is based primarily on difference between one’s potential and performance in tests assessing perceptual abilities, cognitive abilities, and academic performance. The most frequently used research approach was a quantitative research strategy whereas in most cases already existing data were used for analysis. The range of research sample differs significantly. The smallest research sample consisted of 14 respondents and the largest consisted of 4783 respondents. Selected research focused on twice exceptionality especially in pupils during compulsory schooling. Even though pupils with twice exceptionality have a high cognitive giftedness, if they are not recognized they may be at risk of school failure, increased frustration, behavioural problems, emotional problems, and disruption of social relationships.
twice exceptionality, diagnostics of twice exceptionality, cognitive giftedness, specific learning disabilities
Al-Hroub, A., & Whitebread, D. (2019). Dynamic assessment for identification of twiceexceptional learners exhibiting mathematical giftedness and specific learning disabilities. Roeper Review, 41(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585396
Assouline, S. G., Nicpon, M. F., & Whiteman, C. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355974
Baldwin, L., Baum, S., Pereles, D., & Hughes, C. (2015). Twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child
Today, 38(4), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217515597277
Barber, C., & Mueller, C. T. (2011). Social and self-perceptions of adolescents identified as gifted, learning disabled, and twice-exceptional. Roeper Review, 33(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554158
Bell, S. M., Taylor, E. P., Mccallum, R. S., Coles, J. T., & Hays, E. (2015). Comparing prospective
twice-exceptional students with high-performing peers on high-stakes tests of achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592500
Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2013). Differences between children with dyslexia who are
and are not gifted in verbal reasoning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213500342
Bifulco, R., Fletcher, J. M., & Ross, S. L. (2008). The effect of classmate characteristics on individual outcomes: Evidence from the Add Health. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1259570
Crepeau-Hobson, F., & Bianco, M. (2012). Response to intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212454005
ČSI – Česká školní inspekce. (2016). Tematická zpráva. Vzdělávání nadaných, talentovaných
a mimořádně nadaných dětí a žáků. http://www.csicr.cz/html/TZ_Podpora_mimoradne_nadanych/html5/index.html?&locale=CSY&pn=1
ČSI – Česká školní inspekce. (2020). Výroční zpráva České školní inspekce: Kvalita a efektivita
vzdělávání a vzdělávací soustavy ve školním roce 2019/2020. Vyrocni-zprava-Ceske-skolniinspekce-2019-2020_zm.pdf (csicr.cz)
Daniels, P. R. (1983). Teaching the gifted, learning disabled child. Aspen Systems Corporation.
Fox, L. H., Brody, L., & Tobin, D. (1983). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and
programming. University Park Press.
Havigerová, J. M. (2011). Pět pohledů na nadání. Grada.
Hrkal, J. (2019). Kolik je v Česku dětí se zdravotním postižením. Statistika&My. Magazín Českého statistického úřadu. https://www.statistikaamy.cz/2019/12/18/kolik-je-v-cesku-deti-sezdravotnim-postizenim/
Hříbková , L. (2009). Nadání a nadaní: Pedagogicko-psychologické přístupy, modely, výzkumy
a jejich vztah ke š kolské praxi. Grada.
Jucovičová , D., & Žáčková, H. (2014). Reedukace specifický ch poruch učení u dětí. Portál.
Kezer, F., & Arik, R. S. (2012). An examination and comparison of the revisions of the Wechsler
Intelligence Scale for Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2104–2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.436
Lewis, K. D., & Bear, B. J. (2009). Manual of school health: A handbook for school nurses, educators, and health professionals. Saunders.
Lovett, B. J., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2006). Gifted students with learning disabilities. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390060401
Maddocks, D. L. (2018). The identification of students who are gifted and have a learning disability: A comparison of different diagnostic criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752096
Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Report to the subcommittee of education, Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, U.S. Senate). Government Printing Office.
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b3626096&view=1up&seq=15&q1=marland
Mccallum, R. S., Bell, S. M., Coles, J. T., Miller, K. C., Hopkins, M. B., & Hilton-Prillhart, A. (2013).
A model for screening twice-exceptional students (gifted with learning disabilities) within a response to intervention paradigm. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213500070
NÚV – Národní ústav pro vzdělávání. (2013). Analýza pedagogicko-psychologické podpory vzdělávání nadaných a poradenské péče o nadané ve školách a školských poradenských zařízeních. http://www.nuv.cz/uploads//rovne_prilezitosti_ve_vzdelavani/nadani/ostatni/
analyza_podpory_nadanych.pdf
Novotná, P., & Durmeková S. (2009). Kvalitativní a kvantitativní analýza případových studií nadaných realizovaná v roce 2009 v rámci longitudinálního výzkumu mimořádně kognitivně nadaných dětí a žáků. http://www.vyzkum-mladez.cz/zprava/1585660871.pdf
Park, Y., Martin, M., Mccallum, R. S., & Bell, S. M. (2018). Monitoring Instructional Responsiveness−Reading (MIR-R): Preliminary validity and reliability with economically diverse learners. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(5), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918782338
Resing, W. C. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81
Schrank, F. A., & Wendling, B. J. (2009). Educational interventions and accommodations related
to the Woodcock-Johnson® III Tests of Cognitive Abilities and the Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Supplement to the Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin (10). wjiii_asb10.pdf?la=en (hmhco.com)
Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical abstract. Woodcock-Johnson
III Assessment Service Bulletin No. 2. Riverside Publishing. https://www.hmhco.com/~/
media/sites/home/hmh-assessments/clinical/woodcock-johnson/pdf/wjiii/wjiii_asb2.
pdf?la=en
Silva, Marc, A. (2008). Development of the WAIS-III: A brief overview, history, and description.
Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1(1). https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=gjcp
Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání ÚIV. (2003). Vývojová ročenka školství v České republice 1989/90–2002/2003. ÚIV Tauris.
Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání ÚIV. (2005). Vývojová ročenka školství v České republice 1995/96–2004/05. ÚIV Tauris.
Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání ÚIV. (2019). Statistická ročenka školství – výkonové ukazatele 2005/06–2018/19. http://toiler.uiv.cz/rocenka/rocenka.asp
van Viersen, S., Bree, E. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., Slot, E. M., & Jong, P. F. (2015). Risk and protective factors in gifted children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 65(3), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0106-y
van Viersen, S., Kroesbergen, E. H., Slot, E. M., & Bree, E. H. (2014). High reading skills mask dyslexia in gifted children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538517
Vyhláška 27/2016 Sb. ze dne 21. ledna 2016 o vzdělávání žáků se speciálními vzdělávacími potřebami a žáků nadaných. (2016). https://www.aspi.cz/products/lawText/1/85705/1/2/
vyhlaska-c-27-2016-sb-o-vzdelavani-zaku-se-specialnimi-vzdelavacimi-potrebami-azaku-nadanych
Wendling, B. J., Schrank, F. A., & Schmitt, A. J. (2007). Educational interventions related to the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Assessment Service Bulletin No. 8. https://www.hmhco.com/~/media/sites/home/hmh-assessments/clinical/woodcock-johnson/pdf/wjiii/wjiii_asb8.pdf?la=en
Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Allyn & Bacon.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2022 Petra Baranová, Ivana Márová, Petr Kachlík