Correlation Analysis Of Olympic-Style Weightlifting Exercises And Vertical Jumps

Vol.13,No.2(2019)

Abstract

PURPOSE Many types of vertical jumps (VJ) are commonly used to assess the development of the level of explosive strength of lower limbs achieved after a training period. This study is focused on comparing various parameters of different types of VJ with 1 RM in Olympic-style weightlifting, squat and deadlift with an Olympic bar.

METHODS Twelve elite weightlifters (men=8; women=4; age 26±4 years, height = 173±8 cm; weight 93±23 kg; weight category from 64 kg to +109 kg) were tested for 1 RM in the following exercises: snatch, clean and jerk, deadlift, squat and variations of VJ on dynamometric plates (Kistler Force Plate). The variations of VJ were: squat jump with the arm swing (SJA) and non-arm swing (SJ), countermovement jump with the arm swing (CMJA) and non-arm swing (CMJ). The parameters compared for each type of VJ were: jump height (m), relative force (% of body weight), relative power (W/kg of body weight) and average power (W). For statistical analysis, the parametric Pearsons correlation coefficient with α=0.05 was used. 

RESULTS The results show a significant correlation between 1 RM in exercises with an Olympic bar (snatch, clean and jerk, back squat and deadlift) and the CMJ, CMJA, SJ and SJA only in the average power output (W) parameter (p<0.05). The significant correlation coefficients in the average power output (W) were for the CMJA and the snatch r=0.96 r2= 0.92, clean and jerk r=0.96 r2= 0.92, back squat r=0.97 r2= 0.94 and deadlift r=0.93 r2= 0.86; CMJ with hands on the hips and the snatch r=0.93 r2= 0.86, clean and jerk r= 0.93 r2= 0.86, back squat r= 0.95 r2= 0.90 and deadlift r= 0.94 r2= 0.88; for the SJA and the snatch r=0.8 r2= 0.64, clean and jerk r=0.81 r2= 0.65, back squat r=0.82 r2= 0.67 and deadlift r=0.78 r2= 0.60; for the SJ with hands on the hips and the snatch r= 0.76 r2= 0.57, clean and jerk r= 0.75 r2= 0.56, back squat r= 0.77 r2= 0.59 and deadlift r= 0.71 r2= 0.50. Significant correlation coefficients were not found for 1 RM in the snatch, clean and jerk, back squat and deadlift and the CMJ or SJ with and without arm swing in any of the following parameters: jump height (m), relative force (% of body weight), relative power output (W/kg of body weight).

CONCLUSION The main finding is that the jump height (m) of the CMJ or SJ with or without arm swing did not correlate significantly with 1 RM in the snatch, clean and jerk, back squat and deadlift. Therefore, jump height measurement can be used as a motivation tool but not to predict maximum strength in Olympic bar exercises, or vice versa. We recommend using the average power output (W) parameter in the CMJ with using arms as a predictor of current performance level in exercises with an Olympic bar for men and women.

 


Keywords:
snatch; clean and jerk; squat; deadlift; countermovement jump; squat jump

Pages:
26–32
Author biography

Tereza Králová

Masaryk University Faculty of Sports Studies

Katedra atletiky, plavání a sportů v přírodě

Fakulta sportovních studií

Masarykova univerzita, Brno

References

Bompa, T., & Buzzichelli, C. (2015). Periodization Training for Sports, 3E. Human kinetics.

Borba, D. D. A., Ferreira-Júnior, J. B., Santos, L. A. D., Carmo, M. C. D., & Coelho, L. G. M. (2017). Effect of post-activation potentiation in Athletics: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 19(1), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n1p128

Carlock, J. M., Smith, S. L., Hartman, M. J., Morris, R. T., Ciroslan, D. A., Pierce, K. C., ... & Stone, M. H. (2004). The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 18(3), 534-539. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200408000-00025

Duthie, G. M., Young, W. B., & Aitken, D. A. (2002). The acute effects of heavy loads on jump squat performance: An evaluation of the complex and contrast methods of power development. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 16(4), 530-538. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200211000-00007

Everett, G. (2009). Olympic weightlifting: A complete guide for athletes & coaches. Sunnyvale: Catalyst Athletics.

Fatouros, I. G., Jamurtas, A. Z., Leontsini, D., Taxildaris, K., Aggelousis, N., Kostopoulos, N., & Buckenmeyer, P. (2000). Evaluation of plyometric exercise training, weight training, and their combination on vertical jumping performance and leg strength. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 14(4), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200011000-00016

Harman, E. A., Rosenstein, M. T., Frykman, P. N., & Rosenstein, R. M. (1990). The effects of arms and countermovement on vertical jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 22(6), 825-833. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199012000-00015

McGuigan, M. R. (2017). Developing power. Human Kinetics.

Nuzzo, J. L., McBride, J. M., Cormie, P., & McCaulley, G. O. (2008). Relationship between countermovement jump performance and multijoint isometric and dynamic tests of strength. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 22(3), 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816d5eda

Olympic.org (2019). Weightlifting. Retrieved from: http://www.olympic.org/weightlifting.

Otto, W. H. , Coburn, J. W. , Brown, L. E. & Spiering, B. A. (2012). Effects of Weightlifting vs. Kettlebell Training on Vertical Jump, Strength, and Body Composition. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(5), 1199–1202. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f233e

Robbins, D. W. (2005). Postactivation potentiation and its practical applicability: a brief review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(2), 453. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-14653.1

Takano, B. (2012). Weightlifting programming: A winning coach's guide. Catalyst Athletics.

Tricoli, V., Lamas, L., Carnevale, R., & Ugrinowitsch, C. (2005). Short-term effects on lower-body functional power development: weightlifting vs. vertical jump training programs. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 19(2), 433-437. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200505000-00032

Metrics

0


655

Views

466

Bez názvu views