Nepochopená setkání: sémiotika a sociální věda o médiích

Martin Švantner

Abstrakt

The main goal of this mostly theoretical and polemic paper is to discuss common mistakes
connected to misinterpreted theories of signs in selected theoretical researches in the discourse of Czech
media studies. I argue that many theoretical concepts in this discourse are built upon confusions caused by
the reading of secondary literature while ignoring the primary texts written by the founders of semiotics. The
guiding principles of these mistakes, which are described in the article, have mostly two forms: i) the form
of reducing Peirce’s complex semiotic theory to the triplet (popularized by Jakobson) of alleged similarity
(in the case of sign–icon), causality (in the case of the sign–index) and convention (sign–symbol); and ii)
the form of interpretation of Saussure’s purely mental sign as something which has in itself “materiality
of sound” (ergo the signifier is something physical). I would like to show that the original conceptions
of semiotics and semiology have nothing to do with these wild misreadings of secondary sources that,
moreover, cannot be crossbred, which brings problems into the theoretical frames of research.

Klíčová slova

semiotics; epistemology; media studies; Peirce; Saussure; ethic of terminology

Plný Text:

Mobi EPUB

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Aarsleff, Hans. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: University of Minessota Press.

Aboulafia, Mitchell et al. 2012. Habermas and Pragmatism. London/New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714713

Amsterdamska, Olga. 1987 Schools of Thought: The Development of Linguistics from Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Anderson, Douglas R. – Hausman, Carl R. 2012. Conversations on Peirce. Reals and Ideals. New York: Fordham University Press.

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1973. Transformation der Philosophie, II. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Apel, Karl-Otto 1975. Der Denkweg von Charles S. Peirce. Eine Einfiihrung in den amerikanischen Pragmatismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1995. “Transcendential Semiotics and Hypothetical Metaphysics of Evolution: A Peircean or Quasi-Peircean Answer to a Recurent Problem of Post-Kantian Philosophy.“ Pp 366-386 in Ketner, Keneth (ed.) Peirce and Contemporary Thought. New York: Fordham University Press.

Ardener, Edwin. Social Anthropology and Language. London: Routledge.

Bertilsson, Thora Margareta 2009. Peirce's Theory of Inquiry and Beyond: Towards a Social Reconstruction of Science Theory. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Bignell, Jonathan. 2002. Media Semiotics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Teorie jednání. Praha: Karolinum.

Burks, Arthur - Weiss, Paul. 1945. “Peirce’s sixty-six signs”. Pp 383-388 in Journal of Philosophy XLII. https://doi.org/10.2307/2019195

Colapietro, Vincent. 1987. „Semiosis and Subjectivity: A Peircean Critique of Umberto Eco.“ Pp 295-312 in Southern Journal of Philosophy 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1987.tb01624.x

Černý, Jiří – Holeš, Jan. 2004. Sémiotika. Praha: Portál.

Daylight, Russel. 2011. What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure? Edinburg: Edinburg University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641970.001.0001

Derrida, Jacques. 1999. Gramatológia. Bratislava: Archa.

Descombes, Vincent. 1995. Stejné a jiné: Čtyřicet pět let francouzské filosofie. Praha: Oikoymenh.

Eco, Umberto – Martmo, Constantino (eds). On the Medieval Theory of Signs. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Eco, Umberto. 2005. Meze interpretace. Praha: Karolinum.

Eco, Umberto. 2009. Teorie sémiotiky. Praha: Argo.

Eco, Umberto. 2011. Kant a ptakopysk. Praha: Argo.

Eniko, Nemeth T. „ Saussure and Chomsky: The Distinctness of Their ´Identical´ Views“. Pp 420-430 in Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 102.

Fish, Max. 1986. Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Foucault, Michel. Slova a veci. Bratislava: Kalligram.

Fulka, Josef. 2008. Psychoanalýza a francouzské myšlení. Praha: Herrmann a synové.

Gvoždiak, Vít. 2012. Jakobsonova sémiotická teorie. Olomouc: Nakladatelství Univerzity Palackého.

Gvoždiak, Vít. 2014. Základy sémiotiky 1, 2. Oloumouc: Nakladatelství Univerzity Palackého.

Hall, Stuart. 1980. „Encoding/decoding“. Pp 117-126 in S. Hall et al. (eds.). Culture, Media, Language. New York/London: Routledge.

Hanke, Miroslav – Kastnerová, Martina – Švantner, Martin. 2015. Stopování sémiotiky. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.

Harris, Roy. 1987. Reading Saussure: a Critical Commentary on the Cours de linguistique générale. London: Duckworth.

Harris, Roy. 1990. Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein: How to Play Games with Words. London: Routledge.

Hartshorne, Charles. 1984. Creativity in American Philosophy. Albany: SUNY.

Hawkes, Terence. 1999. Strukturalismus a sémiotika. Brno: Host.

Hookway, Christopher. 2002. Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256586.001.0001

Hoskovec, Tomáš. 2008. „Od významu v jazyce ke smyslu v textu. O dobrodružství strukturalistické cesty.” Pp 1-2 in Slovo a slovesnost 69.

Hutton, Christopher – Pable, Adrian. 2015. Signs, Meaning and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

Charvát, Martin – Karľa, Michal – Švantner, Martin. 2015. Archeologie znaku. Vybrané studie k dějinám sémiotiky. Praha: Togga.

Chromý, Jan 2014. Komunikace, média, vzdělávání, kultura. Praha: Extrasystem.

Jirák Jan – Köpplová, Barbara. 2003. Média a společnost. Praha: Portál.

Jirák Jan – Köpplová, Barbara. 2015. Masová média. Praha: Portál.

Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.

Karľa, Michal. 2015. “Peirce´s Doctrine of Man-Sign and its Logical Antecedents“. Pp 277-284 in The American Journal of Semiotics 31(3-4). https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2016227

Klinkenberg, Jean-Marie. 2014. ”O kognitívnej semiotike”. Pp 22-32 in Filozofia 69(1).

Krampen, Martin et al. 1987. Classics of Semiotics. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9700-8

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 2009. Strukturální antropologie. Praha: Portál.

Lotman, Jurij M. 1991. Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Manetti, Giovanni. 1995. Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Marková, Ivana. 2003. Dialogičnost sociální reprezentace: dynamika mysli. Praha: Academia.

McQuail, Denis. 2009 (1997). Úvod do teorie masové komunikace. Praha: Portál.

McQuail, Denis. 2009. Úvod do teorie masové komunikace. Praha: Portál.

Mitoseková, Zofia. 2009. Teorie literatury: historický přehled. Brno: Host.

Musil, Josef. 2010. Sociální a mediální komunikace. Praha: Univerzita Jana Amose Komenského.

Normand, Claudine. 2006. “System, arbitrariness, value.” Pp 88-104 in Ed. Sander, Carol Cambridge Companion to Saussure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052180051X.007

Ogden, Charles K., Richards, Ian A. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt.

Palek, Bohumil. (1997): Sémiotika. Praha: Karolinum.

Parret, Herman. 1976. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. The Hague: Walter de Gruyter.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Eds. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss and Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. (CP)

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1976. New Elements of Mathematics. New York: Hartcourt.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1980–. The Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce: A Chronological Edition, edited by Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (W)

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992. Essential Peirce, I-II. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (EP 1, EP2)

Pharies, David A. 1985. Charles Sanders Peirce and Linguistic Sign. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.9

Polidoro, Piero. 2015. „Umberto Eco and the problem of iconism“. Pp 129-160 in Semiotica 206. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0020

Proni, Giampalo. 2015. „Umberto Eco and Charles Peirce: A slow and respectful convergence“. Pp 13-35 in Semiotica 206. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0021

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1989. Cours de linguistique générale. Edition critique. Wiessbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2007. Kurs obecné lingvistiky. Praha: Academia.

Short, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce´s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498350

Simone, Raffaele. 1992. “Montrer au linguistique ce qu´il fait. Une analyse épistémologique du structuralisme européen (Hjelmslev, Jakobson, Martinet, Benveniste) dans sa filiation saussurienne” Pp 174-96 in II sogno di Saussure, Simone, Raffaele. Bari: Laterza.

Stawarska, Beata. 2015. Saussure’s Philosophy of Language as Phenomenology undoing the doctrine of the course in general linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190213022.001.0001

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology and Semiotics. Berlin: Springer.

Švantner, Martin. 2014a. “O jedné bouři v čajovém hrnku: Ch.S. Peirce, U. Eco a sémiotická metafyzika objektů“. Pp 63-76 in Filozofia 69(1).

Švantner, Martin. 2014b. “Struggle of a description: Peirce and his late semiotic“. Pp 204-214 in Human Affairs 24(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0220-2

Thibault, Paul J. 1997. Re-reading Saussure. The dynamics of signs in social life. London: Routledge.

Trampota, Tomáš – Vojtěchovská, Martina. 2010. Metody výzkumu médií. Praha: Portál.

Vybíral, Zbyněk. 2000. Psychologie komunikace. Praha: Portál.

https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2017-2-99