Urban/Spatial Planners and Power: The Role of Time and Scale
the factors of time and scale, and shows how these lenses might inspire planners to rethink their roles
in a more holistic manner. Planners’ perception of power differs significantly depending whether they
understand change in terms of continuous evolution or discontinuous eras. A desire to understand
the complex processes in which cities evolve puts planners in a rather passive role as trend-watchers,
analysts and moderators. In the second case, planners’ perceptions and roles vary according to how
continual evolution is disconnected and how the factors of space and time are applied. First, if “context”
is understood as the fundamental base, planners see their roles mainly as describing the situation at hand and
opposing those with power in terms of providing relevant information, setting up appropriate agendas and
keeping to specific terms. Second, planners who highlight “context-free values” (or good intentions) prefer
to see their role as keeping their eyes on fair processes, maintaining a balance among participants, striving
for mutual trust and being advocates of those without power. Third, if planners focused on “participants’
behaviour”, which is often rooted in individuals’ subliminal perceptions, they might also tend to nudge
participants in the desired direction and frame tasks, anchor discussions and inhibit automatic reactions
in favour of careful considerations.
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 1979. The Origins of Totalitarianism, new edition with added prefaces. San Diego: A Harvest and HBJ Book.
Batty, Michael. 2010. “Complexity in City Systems: Understanding, Evolution, and Design.” Pp. 99−121 In A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity, edited by Gert de Roo and Elisabete A. Silva. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Baum, Howell. 2011. “Planning and the Problem of Evil.” Planning Theory 10(2): 103−123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210372268
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Campbell, Heather and Robert Marshall. 1998. “Acting on Principle: Dilemmas in Planning Practice.” Planning Practice and Research 13(2): 117−128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459816139
Campbell, Heather and Robert Marshall. 1999. “Ethical Frameworks and Planning Theory.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23(3): 464−478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00208
Christensen, Karen S. 1985. “Coping with uncertainty in planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 51(1): 63−73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368508976801
Damasio, António R. 2000. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Quill.
DE Roo, Gert. and Elisabete A. Silva, eds. 2010. A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
DE Roo, Gert. 2010. “Being or Becoming? That is the Question! Confronting Complexity with Contemporary Planning Theory.” In A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity, edited by Gert de Roo and Elisabete A. Silva. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Dobrucká, Lucia. 2017. “When Planners Depend on Powerful Actors: Automatism Versus Intentions.” Planning Theory 1‒19. Published OnlineFirst on March 24th 2017. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1473095217698725.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2002. “Bringing Planning to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 21: 353−366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100401
Forester, John. 1982. “Planning in the Face of Power.” Journal of the American Planning Association 48(1): 67−80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Forester, John. 1999. “Reflections on the Future of Planning Practice.” International Planning Studies 4: 175−193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563479908721734
Forester, John. 2000. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1998. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, Vol. 1, translated by Robert Hurley. London: Penguin Books.
Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977−78, translated by Graham Burchell, edited by Michel Senellart. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fox-Rogers, Linda and Enda Murphy. 2014. “Informal Strategies of Power in the Local Planning System.” Planning Theory 13(3): 244−268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213492512
Getimis, Panagiotis. 2012. “Comparing Spatial Planning Systems and Planning Cultures in Europe: The Need for a Multi-scalar Approach.” Planning Practice and Research 27(1): 25−40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
Grange, Kristina. 2014. “In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Planning Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning.” Environment and Planning A 46: 2670−2685. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130257p
Gunder, Michael. 2003. “Passionate Planning for the Others Desire: An Agnostic Response to the Dark Side of Planning.” Progress in Planning 60: 235−319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00115-0
Gunder, Michael. 2010. “Planning as the Ideology of (Neo-liberal) Space.” Planning Theory 9(4): 298−314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210368878
Gunder, Michael. 2011. “Fake It Until You Make It, and Then…” Planning Theory 10(3): 201−212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210387542
Gunder, Michael and Jean Hillier. 2009. Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham: Asghate.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category Bourgeois Society, translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Healey, Patsy. 1992. “A Planner’s Day: Knowledge and Action in Communicative Practice.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58: 9−20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975531
Healey, Patsy. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hillier, Jean, Gert de Roo and Joris Van Wezemael. 2012. Complexity and Planning Systems, Assemblages and Simulations. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Hoch, Charles. 2006. “Emotions and Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 7(4): 367−382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350600984436
Hoekveld, Gerard and Barrie Needham. 2013. “Planning Practice between Ethics and the Power Game: Making and Applying an Ethical Code for Planning Agencies.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(5): 1638−1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01146.x
Houdé, Olivier and Grégoire Borst. 2014. “Measuring Inhibitory Control in Children and Adults: Brain Imaging and Mental Chronometry.” Frontiers in Psychology 5(616): 1−7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00616
Jones, Paul. 2011. The Sociology of Architecture: Constructing Identities. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1998. The Prince. Translated and with an introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? London: Duckworth and Co.
Mannheim, Karl. 1940. Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Pløger, John. 2004. “Ethics in Norwegian Planning: Legitimacy, Ambivalence, Rhetoric.” Planning Practice and Research 19(1): 49−66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745042000246577
Purcell, Mark. 2009. “Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements.” Planning Theory 8(2): 140−165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102232
Richardson, Tim. 2005. “Environmental Assessment and Planning Theory: Four Short Stories about Power, Multiple Rationality, and Ethics.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 341−365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.006
Sager, Tore. 2015. “Ideological Traces in Plans for Compact Cities: Is Neo-liberalism Hegemonic?” Planning Theory 14(3): 268−295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214527279
Sandercock, Leonie. 2005 “Picking the Paradoxes: A Historical Anatomy of Australian Planning Cultures.” Pp. 309−330 in Comparative Planning Cultures, edited by Bishwapriya Sanyal. New York: Routledge.
Schmidt-Thomé, Kaisa and Raine Mäntysalo. 2014. “Interplay of Power and Learning in Planning Processes: A Dynamic View.” Planning Theory 13(2): 115−135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213490302
Schröder, Tobias, Terrence C. Stewart and Paul Thagard. 2014. “Intention, Emotion, and Action: A Neutral Theory Based on Semantic Pointers.” Cognitive Science 38: 851−880. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12100
Stein, Stanley M. and Thmas L. Harper. 2003. “Power, Trust, and Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 23: 125−139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03258636
Thaler, Richard H. and Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
VAN Assche, Kristof, Martijn Duineveld, Raoul Beunen and Petruta Teampau. 2011. “Delineating Locals: Transformations of Knowledge/Power and the Governance of the Danube Delta.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 13(1): 1−21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.559087
VAN Assche, Kristof, Raoul Beunen and Martijn Duineveld. 2012. “Performing Success and Failure in Governance: Dutch Planning Experiences.” Public Administration 90(3): 567−581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01972.x
Watson, Vanessa. 2006. “Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics.” Planning Theory 5(1): 31−50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061020
Weber, Max. 1997. Autorita, etika a společnost: Pohled sociologa do dějin [Authority, Ethics and Society: Sociologist’s View on the History]. Prague: Mladá Fronta.