Activities of Women and Men Village Representatives in Poland: A Comparative Gendered Analysis

Ilona Matysiak

Abstrakt

The main aim of this article is to analyze whether women and men differ in performing
the role of village representative – do they express differences in leadership style, have different ideas for
local initiatives, and different ways of cooperating with other local actors? If yes, the question is how these
gender differences could be adequately explained. The theoretical framework draws from the literature
on the substantive representation of women in politics as well as findings about gender differences
in leadership style. The analysis of empirical data presented in the article indicates that the differences
in the modes of working of women and men village representatives are minor and that social role theory
is the most adequate explanation. It is also argued that contextual factors such as the presence or absence
of other women in the local public sphere play a crucial role.

Klíčová slova

gender; village representatives; rural areas; local politics; substantial representation; leadership style

Plný Text:

Mobi (English) ePub (English)

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Appelbaum, Steven H., Lynda Audet and Joanne C. Miller. 2003. “Gender and Leadership? Leadership and Gender? A Journey Through the Landscape of Theories.” Leadership & Organizational Development Journal 24(1): 43−51. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310457320

Avolio, Bruce J., Fred O. Walumbwa and Todd J. Weber. 2009. “Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions.” Annual Review of Psychology 60: 421−449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621

Bartkowski, Jerzy. 2003. Tradycja i polityka: Wpływ tradycji kulturowych polskich regionów na współczesne zachowania społeczne i polityczne [Tradition and Politics: The Influence of Cultural Traditions of Polish Regions on Contemporary Social and Political Behaviour]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademickie “Żak”.

Billing, Yvonne Due. 2011. “Are Women in Management Victims of the Phantom of the Male Norm?” Gender, Work and Organization 18(3): 298−317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00546.x

Billing, Yvonne Due and Mats Alvesson. 2000. “Questioning the Notion of Feminine Leadership: A Critical Perspective on the Gender Labeling of Leadership.” Gender, Work and Organization 7(3): 144−157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00103

Billing, Yvonne Due and Mats Alvesson. 2014. “Leadership: A Matter of Gender?” Pp. 200−223 in The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations, edited by Savita Kumra, Ruth Simpson and Ronald J. Burke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bock, Bettina. 2010. Personal and Social Development of Women in Rural Areas in Europe. Brussels: European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.879105

Bock, Bettina. 2014. “Gender Mainstreaming and Rural Development Policy: The Trivialization of Rural Gender Issues.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 22(5): 731−745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-1922(07)13011-0

Bock, Bettina and Petra Derkzen. 2008. “Barriers to Women’s Participation in Rural Policy Making”. Pp. 263−281 in Gender Regimes, Citizen Participation and Rural Restructuring, edited by Ildikó A. Morell and Bettina Bock. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.

Carli, Linda L. and Alice H. Eagly. 2011. “Gender and Leadership.” Pp. 103−117 in The SAGE Handbook of Leadership, edited by Alan Bryman, David Collinson, Keith Grint, Brad Jackson and Mary Uhl-Bien. London: SAGE.

Celis, Karen. 2008. “Studying Women’s Substantive Representation in Legislatures: When Representative Acts, Contexts and Women’s Interests Become Important.” Representation 44(2): 111−123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079516

Celis, Karen and Sarah Childs. 2008. “Introduction: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women: New Directions.” Parliamentary Affairs 61(3): 419−425. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn006

Celis, Karen and Sarah Childs. 2012. “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?” Political Studies 60: 213−225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00904.x

Childs, Sarah and Mona L. Krook. 2009. “Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition 44(2): 125−145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x

Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11(4): 275−298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x

Eagly, Alice H. and Steven J. Karau. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3): 573−598. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573

Eagly, Alice H., Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt and Marloes L. van Engen. 2003. “Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men.” Psychological Bulletin 129(4): 569−591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

Eagly, Alice H. and Mary C. JohanNesen-Schmidt. 2007. “Leadership Style Matters: The Small but Important, Style Differences between Male and Female Leaders.” Pp. 279−303 in Handbook on Women in Business and Management, edited by Diana BILIMORIA and Sandy K. Piderit. Chetlenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Eagly, Alice H., Wendy Wood and Amanda B. Diekman. 2012. “Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal.” Pp. 123−170 in The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, edited by Thomas Eckes and Hanns M. Trautner. New York: Taylor & Francis Group Psychology Press.

GŁOWNY URZĄD STATYSTYCZNY [Central STATISTICAL OFFICE]. 1968. Sołectwa i sołtysi [Rural Sub-municipal Auxiliary Units and Village Representatives]. Warsaw: GUS.

Jakubczak, Franciszek, ed. 1976. Być w środku życia [Being at the Centre of Life]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo “Książka i Wiedza”.

Little, Jo. 1997. “Constructions of Rural Women’s Voluntary Work.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 4(2): 197−210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699725431

Lovenduski, Joni and Pippa Norris. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51: 84−102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00414

Matysiak, Ilona. 2014. Rola sołtysów we współczesnych społecznościach wiejskich: Płeć jako czynnik różnicujący kapitał społeczny [The Role of Village Representatives in Contemporary Rural Communities. Gender as a Factor Influencing Differences in Social Capital]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”.

Nowak, Andrzej, Marek Kuś, Jakub Urbaniak and Tomasz Zarycki. 2000. “Stimulating the Coordination of Individual Economic Decisions.” Physica A 287: 613−630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00397-6

Paxton, Pamela, Sheri Kunovich and Melanie M. Hughes. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 263−284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131651

Poggio, Barbara. 2006. “Editorial: Outline of a Theory of Gender Practices.” Gender, Work and Organization 13(3): 225−233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00305.x

Schwartz, Shalom H. and Tammy Rubel. 2005. “Sex Differences in Value Priorities: Cross-Cultural and Multimethod Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6): 1010−1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010

Shortall, Sally. 2014. “Gender Mainstreaming and the Common Agricultural Policy.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 22(5): 717−730. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.939147

Siemieńska, Renata. 1990. Płeć, zawód, polityka: Kobiety w życiu publicznym w Polsce [Gender, Profession, Politics: Women in Public Life in Poland]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza “Forum”.

Wawrzykowska-Wierciochowa, Dionizja. 1961. Z dziejów kobiety wiejskiej: Szkice historyczne 1861−1945 [History of Rural Women: Historical Sketches 1861−1945]. Warsaw: Ludowa Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza.

Zimmer, Annette and Renata Siemieńska (eds.). 2003. Gendered Trajectories in Academia in Cross-National Perspective. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”.

Żukowski, Ryszard. 2004. “Historical Path Dependence, Institutional Persistence, and Transition to Market Economy: The Case of Poland.” International Journal of Social Economics 31(10): 955−973. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290410555417

https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2016-4-27