Politizace pracovníků ministerstev v České republice dle pracovních pozic: současná teorie a praxe

Jan Kohoutek, Martin Nekola


The article analyses perceptions of the nature and extent of politicization by officials at eleven ministries of the Czech Republic. The empirical part of the article is based on a large-N inquiry among ministerial officials that were divided into four groups (directors of section, directors of department, heads of division, rank-and-file officials) following their work position. From the theory perspective, the article builds upon two types of politicization – formal and functional – with the latter further subdivided into hidden and partisan politicization. Such theoretical assumptions help towards formulating six hypotheses verified with relation to the four work positions. The corresponding analysis of officials’ perceptions by position attests to a rather limited extent of the two main types of politicization with the exception of functional politicization of top management (director of section). Compared to the other three positions, directors of section show more proclivity to personal contacts (functional-hidden politicization) or to direct party political nomination (functional-partisan politicization). Unlike the conclusions of previous, largely expert or qualitative, inquiries, the officials’ perceptions generally point towards rather moderate politicization of the Czech ministries without excessive direct influence of political representatives.

Klíčová slova

bureaucracy; ministry; politicisation; Czech Republic; public administration

Plný Text:

Mobi ePub


Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Aberbach, Joel D. 2003. “Introduction: Administration in an Era of Change.” Governance 16(3): 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00218

Aberbach, Joel D. a Bert A. Rockman. 2006. “The Past and Future of Political-Administrative Relations: Research from Bureaucrats and Politicians to In the Web of Politics ‒ and Beyond.” International Journal of Public Administration 29(12): 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690600854589

Beblavý, Miroslav, Emília Beblavá a Darina Ondrušová. 2012. “He Who Appoints the Piper: Understanding Reasons and Implications of Agency Management ‘Politicisation’ in Slovakia.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 5(2): 121–139. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-012-0008-x

Bouchal, Petr a Petr Janský. 2014. “Státní úředníci: kolik jich vlastně je, kde a za jaké platy pracují?” Studie Idea. Praha: CERGE.

Colebatch, Hal. 2005. “Policy Analysis, Policy Practice and Political Science.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 64(3): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00448.x

Colebatch, Hal. 2006. The Work of Policy: An International Survey. Oxford: Lexington Books.

Colebatch, Hal, Robert Hoppe a Mirko Noordegraaf (eds.). 2010. Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089642530

Connaughton, Bernadette. 2010. “‘Glorified Gofers, Policy Experts or Good Generalists’: A Classification of the Roles of the Irish Ministerial Adviser.” Irish Political Studies 25(3): 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2010.497636

Dahlström, Carl a Birgitta Niklasson. 2013. “The Politics of Politicization in Sweden.” Public Administration 91(4): 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02113.x

Dimitrova, Antoaneta L. 2010. “The New Member States of the Eu in the Aftermath of Enlargement: Do New European Rules Remain Empty Shells?” Journal of European Public Policy 17(1): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903464929

Eichbaum, Chris a Richard Shaw. 2007. “Ministerial Advisers, Politicization and the Retreat from Westminster: The Case of New Zealand.” Public Administration 85(3): 609–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00666.x

Evans, Bryan Mitchell a Adam Wellstead. 2013. “Policy Dialogue and Engagement between Non-Governmental Organizations and Government: A Survey of Processes and Instruments of Canadian Policy Workers.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(1): 60–87.

Gajduschek, György. 2007. “Politicisation, Professionalisation, or Both? Hungary’s Civil Service System.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40(3): 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.06.004

Gill, Judith I. a Laura Saunders. 1992. “Toward a Definition of Policy Analysis.” New Directions for Institutional Research 1992(76): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019927603

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618819

Hart, Paul ’t a Anchrit Wille. 2006. “Ministers and Top Officials in the Dutch Core Executive: Living Together, Growing Apart?” Public Administration 84(1): 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2006.00496.x

Hood, Christopher. 2002. “Control, Bargains, and Cheating: The Politics of Public-Service Reform.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12(3): 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003536

Hoppe, Robert a Margarita Jeliazkova. 2006. “How Policy Workers Define Their Job: A Netherlands Case Study.” Pp. 35–60 in Hal Colebatch (ed.). The Work of Policy: An International Survey. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Howlett, Michael. 2009. “Policy Analytical Capacity and Evidence-Based Policy-Making: Lessons from Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 52(2): 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x

Howlett, Michael. 2011. “Public Managers as the Missing Variable in Policy Studies: An Empirical Investigation Using Canadian Data.” Review of Policy Research 28(3): 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00494.x

Howlett, Michael a Andrea Migone. 2013a. “Policy Advice through the Market: The Role of External Consultants in Contemporary Policy Advisory Systems.” Policy and Society 32(3): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.005

Howlett, Michael a Andrea Migone. 2013b. “Searching for Substance: Externalization, Politicization and the Work of Canadian Policy Consultants 2006-2013.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(1): 112–133.

Howlett, Michael a Joshua Newman. 2010. “Policy Analysis and Policy Work in Federal Systems: Policy Advice and Its Contribution to Evidence-Based Policy-Making in Multi-Level Governance Systems.” Policy and Society 29(2): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.004

Howlett, Michael a Adam M. Wellstead. 2011. “Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government.” Politics & Policy 39(4): 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00306.x

Hustedt, Thurid a Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen. 2014. “Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(4): 746–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314533449

Keller, Jan. 2007. Sociologie organizace a byrokracie. 2. vyd. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.

Kopecký, Petr, Peter Mair a Maria Spirova. 2012. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599370.001.0001

Kopecký, Petr a Maria Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34(5): 897–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591072

Malíková, Ľudmila a Katarína Staroňová. 2002. “Politicko-administratívne vzťahy na úrovni ústredných orgánov vlády SR.” Sociológia 34(1): 23–35.

Mayer, Igor S., C. Els van Daalen a Pieter WG Bots. 2004. “Perspectives on Policy Analyses: A Framework for Understanding and Design.” International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 4(2): 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2004.004819

Meltsner, Arnold J. 1975. “Bureaucratic Policy Analysts.” Policy Analysis 1(1).

Meltsner, Arnold J. 1976. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2002. “Personnel Policy Regimes, Political Discretion and Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe.” Paper prepared for Workshop 4, "Enlargement and European Governance", ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Turin/Italy, March 22‒27, 2002.

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2004. “Civil Service Reform in Post-Communist Europe: The Bumpy Road to Depoliticisation.” West European Politics 27(1): 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380412331280813

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. “The Changing Colours of the Post-Communist State: The Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary.” European Journal of Political Research 47(1): 1–33.

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009. Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years After EU Accession. Sigma Papers. Cit. 29 června 2014 (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/sustainability-of-civil-service-reforms-in-central-and-eastern-europe-five-years-after-eu-accession_5kml60pvjmbq-en).

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after Accession.” Governance 24(2): 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01523.x

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik a Tim Veen. 2012. “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 28(1): 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2011.635651

Morales, Fernando Nieto, Rafael Wittek a Liesbet Heyse. 2013. “After the Reform: Change in Dutch Public and Private Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(3): 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus006

Mulgan, Richard. 1998. “Politicisation of Senior Appointments in the Australian Public Service.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 57(3): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01277.x

Neuhold, Christine, Sophie Vanhoonacker a Luc Verhey. 2013. Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316813

Ochrana, František. 2014. “Analytičtí a koncepční pracovníci rezortu ministerstva obrany v zrcadle výzkumného projektu „Analytici politiky v ústřední státní správě České republiky: praktiky, profesní hodnoty a identita.“ Vojenské rozhledy 23(1): 50–80. https://doi.org/10.3849/2336-2995.23.2014.01.050-080

O’Dwyer, Conor. 2004. “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe.” World Politics 56(4): 520–553. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0007

O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore: JHU Press.

Olsen, Johan P. 2006. “Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027

Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre. 2004. The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: A Quest for Control. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799857

Peters, Guy B. 2013. “Politicisation: What Is It and Why Should We Care?” Pp. 12–24 in Christine Neuhold, Sophie Vanhoonacker a Luc Verhey (eds.). Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316813_2

Rainey, Hal G. 1979. “Perceptions of Incentives in Business and Government: Implications for Civil Service Reform.” Public Administration Review 39(5): 440–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109918

Rouban, Luc. 2003. “Politicization of the Civil Service.” Pp. 310–320 in Guy B. Peters a Jon Pierre (eds.). Handbook of Public Administration. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608214.n25

Rugge, Fabio. 2003. “Administrative Traditions in Western Europe.” Pp. 177–191 in Guy B. Peters a Jon Pierre (eds.). Handbook of Public Administration. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608214.n15

Schreurs, Freva, Trui Steen a Wouter Vandenabeele. 2011. Politico-Administrative Relations in Top Civil Service in the EU Member Countries. EGPA/IIAS Study Group on Personnel Policies. Leuven: Public Management Institute.

Šebková, Helena (ed.). 2006. Tertiary Education in the Czech Republic. Country Background Report for OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education. Prague: Centre for Higher Education Studies.

Staňová, Ľudmila. 2014. “Explaining Development of Central Structures for Civil Service Management: The Case of the Slovak Civil Service Office.” Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislavě.

Svara, James H. 1999. “Complementarity of Politics and Administration as a Legitimate Alternative to the Dichotomy Model.” Administration & Society 30(6): 676–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953999922019049

Svara, James H. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61(2): 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00020

Svara, James H. 2006. “Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process ‒ A Review of Themes and Issues in the Literature.” International Journal of Public Administration 29(12): 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690600854555

Verheijen, Tony. 2001. Politico-Administrative Relations: Who Rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7155-8

Verheijen, Tony. 2007. Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States: The Limits of Innovation?. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

Veselý, Arnošt. 2013. “Conducting Large-N Surveys on Policy Work in Bureaucracies: Some Methodological Challenges and Implications from the Czech Republic.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(2): 88–113.

Weber, Max. 1972. Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft. Grundriss Der Verstehenden Soziologie. 5. vydání. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Weimer, David a Aidan R. Vining. 1999. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Wellstead, Adam M. a Richard C. Stedman. 2010. “Policy Capacity and Incapacity in Canada’s Federal Government.” Cit. 15. května 2015 (https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=32598).

Zákon o státní službě č. 234/2014 Sb. Praha: Poslanecká sněmovna.