Bergerova konstruktivistická sociologie vědění jako kritika vědomí

Karel Hlaváček

Abstrakt

The article deals with the tension between „value-freeness“ or „objectivity“ and the critical intention in the sociology of Peter L. Berger. I put forward the thesis that Berger’s approach to this problem is inconsistent: Berger often claims his sociology to be value-free, but close investigation discovers implied value-laden contents, consisting in an appeal to human freedom in existentialist sense of the word and critique of what is inconsistent with this appeal. In the article, I analyse this inconsistency and identify the points through which these values leak into Berger’s sociology. I suggest that the value contents are essential to Berger’s sociology, which is why his work should be read as an outline of a critique of consciousness.

Klíčová slova

objectivity; value-freeness; critique; social constructivism; Peter Berger

Plný Text:

Mobi ePub

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

BAEHR, Peter. 2013. „The Undoing of Humanism: Peter L. Berger’s Sociology of Unmasking.” Society 50(4): 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-013-9673-x

BERGER, Peter L. 1969. The Social Construction of Religion. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

BERGER, Peter L. 1971. A Rumour of Angels. Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.

BERGER, Peter L. 2003. „Co se to stalo sociologii?“ Pp. 177–182 in Peter L. Berger. Pozvání do sociologie. Humanistická perspektiva. Brno: Barrister&Principal.

BERGER, Peter L. 2003. Pozvání do sociologie. Humanistická perspektiva. Brno: Barrister&Principal.

BERGER, Peter L. 2012. Dobrodružství náhodného sociologa. Jak vysvětlit svět a přitom nenudit. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

BERGER, Peter L. a Hansfried KELLNER. 1982. Sociology Reinterpreted. An Essay on Method and Vocation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

BERGER, Peter L. a Thomas LUCKMANN. 1999. Sociální konstrukce reality. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

BERGER, Peter L. a Stanley PULLBERG. 1965. „Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness.“ History and Theory 4(2): 196–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504151

CHANCE, Bradley J. 2004. „A Pedagogy of Dealienation: A Case Study in the Application of Peter Berger‘s The Sacred Canopy.“ Teaching Theology and Religion 7(2): 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2004.00198.x

DRÁPALOVÁ, Marie. 2004. „Neodmítnuté pozvání.“ Biograf 11(1): 9798. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739680490424139

FULLER, Robert C. 1987. „Religion and Empiricism in the Works of Peter Berger.“ Zygon 22(4): 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1987.tb00785.x

GILL, Jerry H. 1988. „Objectivity and Social Reality: Peter Berger‘s Dilemma.“ Philosophy Today 32(4): 256–269. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday198832315

HUBÍK, Stanislav. 1999. Sociologie vědění. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.

MARADA, Radim. 1999. Bergerův a Luckmannův existenciální humanismus. Pp. 202–214 in Peter L. BERGER a T. LUCKMANN. Sociální konstrukce reality, Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

MARADA, Radim. 2004. „Kritický intelekt a buržoazní věda: Pojednání o Bergerově Pozvání do sociologie.“ Biograf 11(1): 83–96.

SICA, Alan. 2016. „Social Construction as Fantasy: Reconsidering Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality after 50 Years.” Cultural Sociology 10(1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515614869

VERA, Hector. 2016. „Rebuilding a Classic: The Social Construction of Reality at 50.” Cultural Sociology 10(1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515617489

WOODHEAD, Linda (ed). 2001. Peter Berger and the Study of Religion. London: Routledge.

ZERUBAVEL, Eviatar. 2016. “The Five Pillars of Essentialism: Reification and the Social Construction of Objective Reality.” Cultural Sociology 10(1): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515616905

https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2016-3-21