Can (Inter-party) Politics “Disappear”?

Roman Chytilek

Abstrakt

Based on observational as well as experimental accounts, this meta-analytical article deals with the structure of opportunities and limitations that is encountered in party competition by political actors (especially parties, but, in more personalized contexts, also candidates) when they try to decide whether to prioritize between strategies based on the differentiation of positions on political issues and strategies based on factors that are not directly related to competing on issues. Further, the article outlines the mechanisms that serve to interconnect these two strategies and thus lead to a full-fledged political competition with sufficiently developed positional differentiation. In contrast, emphasizing the disappearance of “the politics of goals” in favour of “the politics of outcomes” is not, according to the current state of knowledge in the field, a rewarding strategy of political competition among parties.

Klíčová slova

politics; political parties; party competition; political space; position; valence; issue ownership

Plný Text:

Mobi (English) ePub (English)

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Adams, James, Bishin, Benjamin G. and Jay K. Dow. 2004. “Representation in Congressional Campaigns: Evidence for Discounting/Directional Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” Journal of Politics 66(2): 348‒373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00155.x

Achterhuis, Hans. 2001. Politika dobrých úmyslů. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

Alvarez, Michael R. 1999. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Alvarez, Michael R. and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. “Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1349–1363. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991862

Anderson, Christopher J. 2000. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 19(2‒3): 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00045-1

Austen-Smith, David. 1987. “Interest Groups, Campaign Contributions, and Probabilistic Voting.” Public Choice 54(2): 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123002

Birch, Sarah. 2003. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938763

Chytilek, Roman. 2014. Politický prostor a politická témata. Studie k soutěži politických stran. Brno: CDK.

Clark, Michael. 2009. “Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998.” Electoral Studies 28(1): 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.009

Clark, Michael and Debra Leiter. 2014. “Does the Ideological Dispersion of Parties Mediate the Electoral Impact of Valence? A Cross-national Study of Party Support in Nine Western European Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 47(2): 171–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488537

Claassen, Ryan L. 2007. “Ideology and Evaluation in an Experimental Setting: Comparing the Proximity and the Directional Models.” Political Research Quarterly 60(2): 263‒273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907302050

Coffey, Daniel J. 2014. Issue Ownership vs. Conflict Extension: Understanding State Party Polarization. Presented at the State politics & policy conference, May 15. Retrieved March 30, 2016 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2439490). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2439490

Damore, David F. 2004. “The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700304

Damore, David F. 2005. “Issue Convergence in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Behavior 27(1): 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3077-6

De Vries, Catherine E. 2010. The Issue Voting Triangle: How Issue Linkage, Issue Competition and Issue Mobilization Facilitate Issue Voting. Working paper. Retrieved March 30, 2016 (https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/paper_de_vries.pdf). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1666069

Dolezal, Martin, Ennsner-Jedenastik, Laurenz, Müller, Wolfgang C. and Anna K. Winkler. 2014. “How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 53(1): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12017

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

Druckman, James N. and Andrew Roberts. 2007. “Communist Successor Parties and Coalition Formation in Eastern Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1): 5‒31. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007X201967

Enelow, James M. and Melvin J. Hinich. 1982. “Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition.” The Journal of Politics 44(1): 115‒130. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130286

Eibl, Otto. 2011. Politický prostor a témata v České republice v letech 2006-2008. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

Ezrow, Lawrence, Homola, Jonathan and Margit Tavits. 2014a. “When Extremism Pays: Policy Positions, Voter Certainty, and Party Support in Postcommunist Europe.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 535‒547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001461

Ezrow, Lawrence, Homola, Jonathan and Margit Tavits. 2014b. “Voter Polarization, Strength of Partisanship, and Support for Extreme Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 47(11): 1558‒1583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512605

Fazekas, Zoltan and Zsombor Z. Méder. 2013. “Proximity and Directional Theory Compared: Taking Discriminant Positions Seriously in Multi-party Systems.” Electoral Studies 32(4): 693‒707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.04.002

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Grofman, Bernard. 1985. “The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting.” The Journal of Politics 47(1): 230‒237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131073

Hammond, Thomas H. and Brian D. Humes. 1993. “‘What This Campaign Is All About Is…’: A Rational Choice Alternative to the Downsian Spatial Model of Elections.” Pp. 141‒159 in Information, Participation, and Choice, edited by Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Hinich, Melvin J. and Michael C. Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.13147

Hinich, Melvin J. and Michael C. Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174725

Hotelling, Harold. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” The Economic Journal 39(153): 41‒57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6‒7): 845‒879. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300607

Koch, Jeffrey W. 2003. “Being Certain Versus Being Right: Citizen Certainty and Accuracy of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” Political Behavior 25(3): 221‒246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025115523298

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon and Timotheos Frey. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921‒956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon and Timotheos Frey. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790720

Kropko, Jonathan. 2012. “Who’s a Directional Voter and Who’s a Proximity Voter? An Application of Finite Mixture Modeling to Issue Voting in the 2008 American Presidential Election.” Working paper. Retrieved March 30, 2016 (http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/manuscript.pdf).

Lacy, Dean and Philip Paolino. 2010. “Testing Proximity Versus Directional Voting Using Experiments.” Electoral Studies 29(3): 460‒471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.008

Lachat, Romain. 2008. “The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting.” Electoral Studies 27(4): 687‒698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.002

Lachat, Romain. 2014. “Issue Ownership and the Vote: The Effects of Associative and Competence Ownership on Issue Voting.” Swiss Journal of Political Science. Retrieved March 30, 2016 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spsr.12121/abstract). https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12121

Lanz, Simon. 2014. Issue Ownership Voting in Polarized Party Systems. Working paper. Retrieved March 30, 2016 (http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/f6bb2345-f7a1-443c-85d9-b3b180bb1a3f.pdf).

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lilleker, Darren G. 2014. Political Communication and Cognition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313430

Matthews, Steven A. 1979. “A Simple Direction Model of Electoral Competition.” Public Choice 34(2): 141‒156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129523

Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, Rabinowitz, George and Ola Listhaug. 1995. “Political Sophistication and Models of Issue Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 25(4): 453‒483. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007316

Macdonald, Stuart Elaine and George Rabinowitz. 1998. “Solving the Paradox of Nonconvergence: Valence, Position, and Direction in Democratic Politics.” Electoral Studies 17(3): 281‒300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00032-8

Meguid, Bonnie M. 2005. “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 347‒359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701

Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510298

Merrill III, Samuel and Bernard Grofman. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864

Narud, Hanne Marthe and Henry Valen. 2001. “Issue Ownership in a Multidimensional Policy Space – Voters’ Evaluation of Party Performance.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, August 30.

Pardos-Prado, Sergi and Elias Dinas. 2010. “Systemic Polarisation and Spatial Voting.” European Journal of Political Research 49: 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01918.x

Rabinowitz, George and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Voting.” American Political Science Review 83(1): 93–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956436

Riker, William H. 1983. “Political Theory: The Art of Heresthetics.” Pp. 47‒67 in Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ada W. Finifter. Washington: American Political Science Association.

Riker, William H. 1993. “Rhetorical Interaction in the Ratification Campaigns.” Pp. 81‒125 in Agenda Formation, edited by William H. Riker. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Robertson, David. 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London: Wiley.

Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Strany a stranické systémy: Schéma pro analýzu. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

Sides, John. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36(3): 407‒436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000226

Sides, John. 2007. “The Consequences of Campaign Agendas.” American Politics Research 35(4): 465‒488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07300648

Smithies, Arthur. 1941. “Optimum Location in Spatial Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 49(3): 423‒439. https://doi.org/10.1086/255724

Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” The American Political Science Review 57(2): 368‒377. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952828

Stokes, Donald E. 1992. “Valence Politics.” Pp. 141‒164 in Electoral Politics, edited by Dennis Kavanagh. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Tavits, Margit. 2005. “The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-communist Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 283‒298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00123.x

Tavits, Margit. 2013. Post-communist Democracies and Party Organization. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565196

Tavits, Margit and Natalia Letki. 2009. “When Left is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-communist Europe.” American Political Science Review 103(4): 555‒569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990220

Tavits, Margit and Natalia Letki. 2014. “From Values to Interests? The Evolution of Party Competition in New Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 76(1): 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161300131X

van Biezen, Ingrid. 2003. Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937858

Wagner, Markus. 2012. “When do Parties Emphasize Extreme Positions? How Strategic Incentives for Policy Differentiation Influence Issue Importance.” European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 64‒88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01989.x

https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2016-1-23