Motivation for Environmental Direct Action in the Czech Republic: The Case of the 2011 Blockade at the Šumava National Park

Vojtěch Pelikán, Hana Librová

Abstrakt

This article is a case study of the most significant Czech environmental direct-action over the past few years – the blockade that was to stop the logging taking place in a wilderness zone of the Šumava National Park in the summer 2011. The empirical findings draw on two surveys that were carried out among the blockade participants more than a year apart. The article focuses on the participants’ motivation. The types of motivation are analyzed by the three types of motivation categories as they are formulated in normative ethics: teleological, deontological, and virtue ethics. Results are interpreted within the context of normative ethics and of theories dealing with the dynamics of contention. The theoretical premise is that different types of motivation for environmentally-oriented behaviour contain different levels of expectations, and through these expectations they carry different levels of the potential for disappointment and resignation. Despite the fact that the blockade did not stop the logging – and so in fact could be seen as a failure – the respondents did not express disappointment. On the contrary, their attitudes showed a strikingly unified resistance and determination to participate in the blockade again. The analysis of the responses reveals why this could be so: the participants’ motivation is not directly linked to protecting the Šumava landscape, it is not of the teleological type that contains specific expectations. It is largely inspired by virtue ethics, by a civic mind-set that strives for personal integrity, does not contain high expectations in terms of external changes, and is resistant to fatigue.

Klíčová slova

environmental movements; ethical motivations; Šumava National Park; direct action; potential for disappointment

Plný Text:

Mobi (English) ePub (English)

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

ANDERSON, Jon. 2010. “From ‘Zombies’ to ‘Coyotes’: Environmentalism Where We Are.” Environmental Politics 19 (6): 973─991. ISSN 0964-4016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.518684

BINKA, Bohuslav. 2010. Zelený extremismus: ideje a mentalita českých environmentálních hnutí. [Green Extremism: The Ideas and the Mentality of Czech Environmental Movements.] Brno: Masaryk University. ISBN 80-210-4791-4.

BISON & ROSE. 2013. Kalamita tisíciletí – Chráníme Šumavu, ne kůrovce. [The Calamity of the Millennium—We Are Protecting Šumava, Not the Bark Beetle.] Case study. Bison & Rose. Retrieved November 18, 2014 (http://www.bisonrose.cz/download/BaR-pripadovky2012_01_Sumava_n03.pdf).

BRAUN, Virginia & Victoria CLARKE. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. ISSN 1478-0887. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

BROOKS, David. 2000. Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-85378-7.

BROWN, Michael & John MAY. 1989. The Greenpeace Story. London: Dorling Kindersley Limited. ISBN 0-86318-691-2.

CAFARO, Philip. 2004. Thoreau’s Living Ethics: Walden and the Pursuit of Virtue. Athens: University of Georgia Press. ISBN 0-08203-2610-0.

ČERVENKA, Jan. 2007. Naléhavost řešení problémů. [The Urgency of Resolving Problems.] Press release of the Public Opinion Research Centre (CVVM). Retrieved September 2, 2014 (http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/politicke-ostatni/nalehavost-reseni-problemu).

ČERVENKA, Jan. 2014. Naléhavost zabývání se oblastmi veřejného života – únor 2014. [The Urgency of Dealing with Areas of Public Life—February 2014.] Press release of the Public Opinion Research Centre (CVVM). Retrieved September 2, 2014 (http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/politicke-ostatni/nalehavost-zabyvani-se-oblastmi-verejneho-zivota-unor-2014).

CHVOJKOVÁ, Eva. 2011. Kácení na Ptačím potoce v NP Šumava. [Logging at Ptačí Potok in the Šumava National Park.] Expert report in the field of Nature Protection.

ČINOVSKÁ, Ľudmila. 2012. Obraz šumavskej blokády (2011) vo vybraných českých médiách. [The Image of the Šumava Blockade (2011) in Selected Czech Media.] Bachelor’s Thesis. Brno: Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University.

CÍSAŘ, Ondřej. 2010. “Externally-Sponsored Contention: The Channelling of Environmental Movement Organisations in the Czech Republic after the Fall of Communism.” Environmental Politics 19(5): 736–755. ISSN 0964-4016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.508305

COX, Laurence. 2011. How Do We Keep Going? Activist Burnout and Personal Sustainability in Social Movements. Helsinki: Into-ebooks.

DEVALL, Bill. 1988. Simple in Means, Rich in Ends: Practicing Deep Ecology. Layton: Gibbs Smith. ISBN 0-87905-294-5.

DREES, Willem B. (ed.). 2003. Is Nature Ever Evil?: Religion, Science, and Value. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-29061-9. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398173

DRURY, John & Steve REICHER. 2005. “Explaining Enduring Empowerment: A Comparative Study of Collective Action and Psychological Outcomes.” European Journal of Social Psychology 35(1): 35–58. ISSN 1099-0992. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231

DUGAN, Kimberly B. 2004. “Strategy and ‘Spin’: Opposing Movement Frames in an Anti-Gay Voter Initiative.” Sociological Focus 37(3): 213–233. ISSN 0038-0237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2004.10571243

FAGAN, Adam. 2004. Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. ISBN 1-85898-876-4.

FOREMAN, Dave. 1991. Confessions of an Eco-Warrior. New York: Harmony Books. ISBN 0-517-88058-X.

FOUCAULT, Michel. 1984. Von der Freundschaft als Lebensweise: Im Gespräch. Berlin: Merve Verlag.

FRASZ, Geoffrey. 2005. “Benevolence as an Environmental Virtue.” Pp. 121–134 in Environmental Virtue Ethics, edited by Ronald L. SANDLER & Philip CAFARO. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, ISBN 0-7425-3390-5.

GIUGNI, Marco. 2004. Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-1826-4.

GOODWIN, Jeff & James M. JASPER. 2006. “Emotions and Social Movements.” Pp. 611–635 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research), edited by Jan STETS & Jonathan H. TURNER. Springer: New York. ISBN 0-387-30713-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30715-2_27

HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. 2002. Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-09292-3. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828265

HNUTÍ DUHA. 2012a. Kácení u Ptačího potoka – vedení parku pokračuje v porušování zákonů. [Logging at Ptačí Potok—The Park Administration Continues to Break the Law.] Press release, June 25. Retrieved October 16, 2013 (http://www.hnutiduha.cz/aktualne/kaceni-u-ptaciho-potoka-vedeni-parku-pokracuje-v-porusovani-zakonu).

HNUTÍ DUHA. 2012b. Výroční zpráva Hnutí DUHA 2011. [Hnutí DUHA Annual Report 2011.] Brno: Hnutí DUHA. Retrieved October 22, 2013 (http://www.hnutiduha.cz/publikace/vyrocni-zprava-roku-2011).

HORTON, Dave. 2003. “Green Distinctions: The Performance of Identity among Environmental Activists.” The Sociological Review 51(s2): 63–77. ISSN 1467-954X. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00451.x

HRADSKÁ, Vlaďka. 2011. “Ke stromům se poutali pomocí trubek!” [“They Have Tied Themselves to Trees with Tubes!”] Blesk, July 28, pp. 8. ISSN 1213-8991.

JACQUES, Peter J. 2009. Environmental Skepticism: Ecology, Power and Public Life. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate. ISBN 0-7546-7102-2.

JANDOVÁ, Eva. 2011. Usnesení č. 15 Nc 53/2011 – 46 ze dne 22. 7. 2011. [Ruling n. 15 Nc 53/2011—46 passed on 22 July 2011.] The District Court in Klatovy. Retrieved October 22, 2013 (http://www.npsumava.cz/gallery/14/4288-predbezne_opatreni.pdf). https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.46.14.psychnews_46_14_22

JN. 2011. “Ochránci stromů žalují národní park.” [“Tree Protectors Have Sued the National Park.”] MF Dnes, August 3, pp. 4. ISSN 1210-1168.

KINDLMANN, Pavel, Roman FUCHS & Petr ŠÍPEK. 2012. Posudek č. 3 č. j. 36/12 ze dne 3. 1. 2012 pro Českou inspekci životního prostředí. [Report n. 3 p.n. 36/12 from 3 January 2012 for the Czech Environmental Inspectorate.] Praha: Charles University.

KINGSNORTH, Paul. 2010. “Why I Stopped Believing in Environmentalism and Started the Dark Mountain Project.” Guardian Environment Network, August 29. Retrieved November 20, 2013 (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/29/environmentalism-dark-mountain-project).

KLOS, Čestmír. 2012. “Vítáme kůrovce v nové sezóně. Ať se daří!” [“We Welcome the Bark Beetle in the New Season. May You Be Well!”] Ekolist, June 20. Retrieved September 15, 2013 (http://www.ceskapozice.cz/domov/ekologie/vitame-kurovce-v-nove-sezone-se-dari).

KOUBALÍKOVÁ, Jitka. 2011. Rozhodnutí správního řízení č. j. ČIŽP/42/OOP/SR01/1106446.001/11/CJL ze dne 24. 8. 2011. [Final Decision of the Administrative Proceedings p.n. ČIŽP/42/OOP/SR01/1106446.001/11/CJL from 24 August 2011.] České Budějovice: The Czech Environmental Inspectorate, Regional Inspectorate České Budějovice.

KRYSL, Alexandr. 2013. Rozsudek jménem republiky. [A Ruling in the Name of the Republic.] Plzeň: The Regional Court in Plzeň. December 11. Retrieved November 4, 2014 (http://www.hnutiduha.cz/sites/default/files/publikace/2014/01/140120_rozsudek_ks_plzen.pdf).

LE BON, Gustav. 1895. La Psychologie des Foules. Alcan.

LIBROVÁ, Hana. 1994. Pestří a zelení: kapitoly o dobrovolné skromnosti. [The Colourful and the Green: Chapters on Voluntary Simplicity.] Brno: Veronica & Hnutí DUHA. ISBN 80-85365-18-8.

LIBROVÁ, Hana. 2003. Vlažní a váhaví: kapitoly o ekologickém luxusu. [The Half-Hearted and the Hesitant: Chapters on Ecological Luxury.] Brno: Doplněk. ISBN 80-7239-149-6.

LIBROVÁ, Hana. 2010. “Individualizace v environmentální perspektivě: sociologické rámování mění pohled a plodí otázky.” [“Individualization in an Environmental Perspective: Framing Changes the View and Generates Questions.”] Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 46(1): 125–152. ISSN 0038-0288.

LIBROVÁ, Hana. 2013. “Environmentálně orientované motivace a potenciál zklamání.” [“Environmentally-Oriented Motivation and the Potential for Disappointment.”] Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 49(1): 53–74. ISSN 0038-0288.

LIBROVÁ, Hana & Vojtěch PELIKÁN. 2016. “Ethical Motivations and the Phenomenon of Disappointment in Two Types of Environmental Movements: Neo-Environmentalism & the Dark Mountain Project.” Environmental Values 25(1?). ISSN 0963-2719. (Accepted for publication.) https://doi.org/10.3197/096327116X14552114338828

LOUIS, Winnifred R. 2009. “Collective Action—and Then What?” Journal of Social Issues 65(4): 727–748. ISSN 1540-4560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.x

MacINTYRE, Alasdair C. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

McCARTHY, John D. & Mayer N. ZALD. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” The American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212-1241. ISSN 0002-9602. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464

MELUCCI, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-57843-4. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891

NOVÁK, Arnošt. 2013. “Česká environmentální přímá akce v mezinárodním kontextu.” [“Czech Environmental Direct Action in an International Context.”] Mezinárodní vztahy 48 (3): 81–103. ISSN 0323-1844.

O’NEIL, John, Allan HOLLAND & Andrew LIGHT. 2008. Environmental Values. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-14509-1.

PAŠKOVÁ, Jindra. 2011. “Ekologičtí aktivisté na Šumavě brání stromy svými těly.” [“Ecological Activists in Šumava Protect Trees with Their Bodies.”] Právo, July 18, pp. 4. ISSN 1211-2119.

PIVOŇKA, Zdeněk. 2011. Rozsudek jménem republiky o námitkách žalobce proti rozpuštění shromáždění konaného dne 25. 7. 2011 nejpozději do dne 12. 8. 2011 v oblasti Ptačího potoka v Národním parku Šumava ze dne 5. 10. 2011. [A ruling passed on 5 October 2011 in the name of the republic regarding the objections of the plaintiff against the order to disband the gathering that took place in the area of Ptačí Potok in the Šumava National Park on the day of 25 June 2011 by the day of 12 August 2011 at the latest.] The Regional Court in Plzeň. Retrieved September 21, 2014 (http://issuu.com/hnuti_duha/docs/rozhodnuti_ks_plzen_57a66-2011).

POLLARD, Dave. 2012. “Giving Up on Environmentalism.” How to Save the World. Blog post from April 12. Retrieved October 12, 2014 (http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2012/04/10/giving-up-on-environmentalism/).

PORRITT, Jonathon. 2005. Capitalism as If the World Matters. London: Earthscan. ISBN 1-84407-193-6.

SANDLER, Ronald L. & Philip CAFARO (eds.). 2005. Environmental Virtue Ethics. Lanham, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-3390-5.

SANEP. 2011. Češi nevěří, že si příroda s kůrovcovou kalamitou poradí sama, a stojí na straně NP Šumava. [Czechs Do Not Believe that Nature Can Deal with the Bark Beetle Calamity by Itself, They Stand on the Side of the Šumava National Park.] Press release, August. Retrieved November 3, 2014 (http://www.npsumava.cz/gallery/14/4270-pruzkum_sanep_cesi_v_boji_s_kurovcem_podporuji_np_sumava.pdf).

SCHMIDT, Andreas, Ana IVANOVA & Mike S. SCHÄFER. 2013. “Media Attention for Climate Change around the World: A Comparative Analysis of Newspaper Coverage in 27 Countries.” Global Environmental Change 23(5): 1233–1248. ISSN 0959-3780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020

SCHMIDT, Kees. 1993. “On Economization and Ecologization as Civilizing Processes.” Environmental Values 2(1): 33–46. ISSN 0963-2719. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327193776679963

SHELLENBERGER, Michael & Ted NORDHAUS. 2004. The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. Oakland: Breakthrough Institute. Retrieved December 5, 2014 (http://www.thebreakthrough.org/images/Death_of_Environmentalism.pdf).

SIEFERLE, Rolf. P. 1997. Rückblick auf die Natur: Eine Geschichte des Menschen und seiner Umwelt. München: Luchterhand. ISBN 3-630-87993-4.

SKALÍK, Jan & Matěj BAJGAR. 2012. Nalezeni na ztraceném. [Found at Na Ztraceném.] Documentary film, 42 min. Retrieved October 18, 2013 (http://www.nalezeninaztracenem.cz).

SOKOL, Jan. 2010. Etika a život: pokus o praktickou filosofii. [Ethics and Life: An Attempt at Practical Philosophy.] Praha: Vyšehrad. ISBN 80-7429-223-1.

STIBRAL, Karel. 2005. Proč je příroda krásná?: estetické vnímání přírody v novověku. [Why Is Nature Beautiful?: The Aesthetic Perception of Nature in the Modern Age.] Praha: Dokořán. ISBN 80-7363-008-7.

STÜRMER, Stefan & Bernd SIMON. 2004. “The Role of Collective Identification in Social Movement Participation: A Panel Study in the Context of the German Gay Movement.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(3): 263–277. ISSN 0146-1672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690

TNS AISA. 2012. Co si Češi myslí o aktuálním dění v Národním parku Šumava? [What Do Czechs Think about the Current Events in the Šumava National Park?] Press release, June.

TNS AISA. 2011. Postoj veřejnosti ke kácení v Národním parku Šumava. [The Public Stance on the Logging in the Šumava National Park.] Press release, August.

VAN STEKELENBURG, Jacquelien & Bert KLANDERMANS. 2007. “Individuals in Movements: A Social Psychology of Contention.” Pp. 157–204 in The Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines, edited by Bert KLANDERMANS & Conny M. ROGGEBAND. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-70960-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70960-4_5

VAN ZOMEREN, Martijn & Russell SPEARS. 2009. “Metaphors of Protest: A Classification of Motivations for Collective Action.” Journal of Social Issues 65(4): 661–679. ISSN 1540-4560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01619.x

VANĚK, Miroslav. 1996. Nedalo se tady dýchat: ekologie v českých zemích v letech 1968 až 1989. [One Could Not Breathe Here: Ecology in the Czech Lands 1968–1989.] Praha: Maxdorf. ISBN 80-85270-62-5.

VIDOMUS, Petr. 2011. “Kontrahnutí v perspektivách sociologie sociálních hnutí.” [“Counter-Movements from the Perspectives of the Sociology of Social Movements.”] Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review (47)2: 325–359. ISSN 0038-0288.

VLAŠÍN, Mojmír. 2012a. “Vyhráváme jeden soud za druhým, ale kácí se dál.” [“We Have Been Winning One Court Case After Another, But the Logging Goes On.”] iDNES.cz. Blog post from July 27. RetrievedNovember 15, 2013 (http://vlasin.blog.idnes.cz/c/281159/Vyhravame-jeden-soud-za-druhym-ale-kaci-se-dal.html).

VLAŠÍN, Mojmír. 2012b. “Jak šel čas na Šumavě.” [“How the Time Went at Šumava.”] iDNES.cz. Blog post from September 12. Retrieved November 15, 2013 (http://vlasin.blog.idnes.cz/c/286495/Jak-sel-cas-na-Sumave.html).

VOSS, Kim. 1996. “The Collapse of a Social Movement: The Interplay of Mobilizing Structures, Framing, and Political Opportunities in the Knights of Labor.” Pp. 227–261 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing, edited by Doug McADAM, John D. McCARTHY & Mayer N. ZALD. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48516-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803987.012

WEBER, Max. 1922. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I. Tübingen: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

WILSON, Hugh. 2007. “Have You Got Green Fatigue?” The Independent, September 20. Retrieved October 22, 2012 (http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/have-you-got-green-fatigue-402971.html).

https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2015-3-27