Generation Y And Z's Perspectives on Their Future Employment Relations and Organizational Cultures against the Background of the Digital Transformation of Work

Roč.22,č.2(2025)
The Future of Work

Abstrakt

Digital transformation is fundamentally changing organizational cultures and attitudes towards work, particularly through the blurring of boundaries between work and private life. This study is part of the research project “Work of the future” and contributes to a better understanding of attitudes towards, and acceptance patterns of new work arrangements among Generation Y and Z students. Using an online survey, it analyzes perceptions of digitally-transformed workplaces, working hours, and responsibilities for lifelong learning and further training. The results reveal three interesting insights. First, no significant differences emerge between the generations in terms of the acceptance of digital working models and preferred working hours. Second, Generation Z positions itself more clearly by holding employers more accountable for individualized further training schemes and career opportunities. Finally, statistically significant gender-specific differences are confirmed regarding preferred working hours and attitudes towards digitally-transformed employment relations, with lower acceptance levels among females.


Klíčová slova:
work of the future; Gen Z, Gen Y; labor market; quantitative study
Reference

Arnold, D., S. Steffes, and S. Wolter. 2015. Mobiles und entgrenztes Arbeiten. (Forschungsbericht / Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, FB460). Nürnberg: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (IAB); Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) GmbH; Universität Köln. [Mobile Work and Blurring Boundaries. (Research report / Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs Germany). Nuremberg: Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs; Institute for Employment Research of the Federal Employment Agency (IAB); Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW); University of Cologne] https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-47129-5

Bayhan, H. G. and E. Karaca. 2020. “Technological Innovation in Architecture and Engineering Education - An Investigation on Three Generations from Turkey.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17(33): 1–22.

Borwein, S., B. Magistro, P. Loewen, B. Bonikowski, and B. Lee-Whiting. 2024. “The Gender Gap in Attitudes toward Workplace Technological Change.” Socio-Economic Review 22(3): 993–1017.

Brynjolfsson, E., D. Li, and L. Raymond. 2023. Generative AI at Work. NBER Working Paper Series No 31161. DOI 10.3386/w31161

Brynjolfsson, E. and A. McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. Norton & Company.

Carstensen, V. and N. Dağlar-Sezer. 2024a. “Die Sicht der Generationen Y und Z auf die digitale Transformation der Arbeits- und Lebenswelten [The View of Generation Y and Z on the Digital Transformation of the Working and Living Environments].” DFG SPP 2267 Conference Digitalisation of Working Worlds – Conceptualising and Capturing a Systemic Transformation. https://digitalisierung-der-arbeitswelten.de/files/downloads/WTR2024/8-DaglarSezer-Carstensen.pdf

Carstensen, V. and N. Dağlar-Sezer. 2024b. “Diversity at the Workplace – Overlooked Categories?” Pp.  82–92 in Diversity, Equality and Inclusion, edited by Meydanoğlu Bayrak, E. S., Öztürk, R., Zamantili Nayir, D., Klein, M. Shaker Verlag.

Dimock, M. 2019. “Defining Generations: Where Millennials Ends and Generation Z Begins.” Pew Research Center (https://pewrsr.ch/2szqtJz).

Egerová, D., J. Kutlák, and L. Eger. 2021. “Millennial Job Seekers Expectations: How do Companies respond?” Economics & Sociology 14(1): 46–60.

Goebel, J., M. Grabka, S. Liebig, M. Kroh, D. Richter, C. Schröder, and J. Schupp. 2019. “The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 239(2): 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0022

Goerlich, C. and B. Vis. 2024. “Different Ways of Promoting Working Time Reduction: A Comparative Analysis of Actors, Motives, Forms, and Approaches in Germany, Ireland, and Spain.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 26(2): 159–177.

Hartmann, H. 2009. “Women, the Recession, and the Stimulus Package.” Dissent 56(4): 42–47.

International Labour Organization (ILO). 2021. World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: Trends 2021. Retrieved September 15, 2024 (https://www.ilo.org/research-and-publications/world-employment-and-social-outlook/world-employment-and-social-outlook-trends-2021).

Kalleberg, A. L. 2009. “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition.” American Sociological Review 74(1): 1–22.

Karjalainen, M. 2023. “Gender and the Blurring Boundaries of Work in the Era of Telework – A Longitudinal Study.” Sociology Compass 17(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13029

Katz, R., S. Ogilvie, J. Shaw, and L. Woodhead. 2021. Gen Z, Explained – The Art of Living in a Digital Age. The University of Chicago Press.

Limesurvey GmbH. 2023. LimeSurvey: An Open Source Survey Tool [Software]. Hamburg, Germany. URL http://www.limesurvey.org

Mandel, H., A. Lazarus, M. Shaby. 2020. “Economic Exchange or Gender Identities? Housework Division and Wives’ Economic Dependency in Different Contexts.” European Sociological Review 36(6): 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa023

Mazmanian, M., W. J. Orlikowski, and J. Yates. 2013. “The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Technology for the Emerging Workforce.” Organization Science 24(5): 1337–1357.

Ngai, L. R. and C. A. Pissarides. 2008. “Trends in Hours and Economic Growth.” Review of Economic Dynamics 11(2): 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2007.07.002

Pfeiffer, S., M. Nicklich, M. Henke, M. Heßler, M. Krzywdzinski, and I. Schulz-Schaeffer, (eds.). 2024. Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelten: Zur Erfassbarkeit einer systemischen Transformation [Digitalization of Working Worlds. Conceptualizing and Capturing a Systemic Transformation]. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44458-7

Pongratz, H. and G. G. Voß. 2003. “From Employee to ‘Entreployee’: Towards a ‘Self-Entrepreneurial’ Work Force?” Concepts and Transformation 8: 239–254.

Rammstedt, B. and O. P. John. 2007. “Measuring Personality in One Minute or Less: A 10-item Short Version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German.” Journal of Research in Personality 41(1): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001

Ruiz-Vázquez, Marcela Haydée, Francisco Gabriel Rodríguez-González, Juana Cecilia Trujillo-Reyes. 2024. “Personality and Leadership Style in Generation Z: A Quantitative Study in a Higher Education Institution in Mexico.” Intangible Capital 20(1): 170–192.

Ruf, K., J. Mackeben, P. Grunau, and S. Wolter. 2020. “A unique Employer-Employee Study: the Linked Personnel Panel (LPP) – Design, Extensions and Research Potential.” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 240(1): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0045

Schroth, H. 2019. “Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?” California Management Review 61(3): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006

Singh, A. 2014. “Challenges and Issues of Generation Z.” IOSR Journal of Business and Management 16(7): 59–63.

Seifert, C. F., V. Ness, K. Raymond, R. E. Erik, B. Cheryl, P. D. Caroline. 2023. “Generation Work Ethic Differences: From Baby Boomers to Gen Z.” Journal of Managerial Issues 35(4): 401–422

Sennett, R. 2005. Die Kultur des neuen Kapitalismus [The Culture of the New Capitalism] Luzern.

Stadler, B. 2024. Je weniger Grenzen umso länger? Die Wirkung von arbeitgeber:innen-seitig flexiblen und entgrenzten Arbeitszeiten auf die wöchentliche Arbeitszeit. [The Fewer Limits, the Longer? The Effect of Employer-side Flexible and Blurring Boundaries on Weekly Working Hours]. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 78: 54–65.

Voß, G. 1998. “Die Entgrenzung von Arbeit und Arbeitskraft. Eine subjektorientierte Interpretation des Wandels der Arbeit. Sonderdruck aus [The dissolution of boundaries between work and labor. A subject-oriented interpretation of the transformation of work. Offprint].” Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung 31.

Metriky

0

Crossref logo

0


2

Views

0

pdf (angličtina) views

2

mobi (angličtina) views

4

epub (angličtina) views