Looking Back on Corruption: Representations of Corruption and Anti-corruption in Czech Party Manifestos between 1990–2017
Roč.20,č.1(2023)
Open Issue
This study follows the constructivist tradition of corruption research. Specifically, we analyze representations of corruption and anti-corruption in the electoral manifestos of Czech political parties and movements between 1990 and 2017. In these documents, corruption is primarily construed as a security issue and is framed within the context of economic and organized crime. The causes of corruption, the main actors behind it, and the proposed countermeasures draw on three dominant discourses: neoliberal, centrist, and populist. Neoliberal discourse attributes corruption to the overextended nature of the state, with public officials as the primary perpetrators of corruption. Countermeasures are based on streamlined public administration and personal accountability of government employees in this discourse. Centrist discourse sees the interweaving of economic and political power as the cause of corruption perpetrated by the mafia or lobbyists. Countermeasures are rooted in legal regulation and cooperation with anti-corruption forces in this discourse. Populist discourse provides an updated interpretation of the former two discourses. It borrows the metaphoric labeling of perpetrators from the centrist repertoire and the logic behind the proposed countermeasures from neoliberal discourse. In the conclusion, we compare our findings with the political constructions of corruption in other cultural contexts. We also shed light on some of the circumstances that may have contributed to framing corruption as a security issue in Czechia.
corruption, anti-corruption, official representations, electoral manifestos, post-socialism, Czechia
Bašná, Kristýna. “Income inequality and level of corruption in post-communist European countries between 1995 and 2014.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 52(2): 93–104.
Berri, Carlo, Roxana Bratu, and Sofia Wickberg. 2020. “Corruption and The Media.” Pp. 107–117 in A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption, edited by Alina Mungiu-Pippidi and Paul Heywood. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bewley-Taylor, David and Michael Woodiwiss. 2005. The global fix: The construction of a global enforcement régime. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute TNI Briefing Series.
Blažek, Pavel. 2009. Krach: Temné pozadí Kubiceho aféry. Brno: Jota
Bratu, Roxana and Iveta Kažoka. 2018. “Metaphors of Corruption in the News Media Coverage of Seven European Countries.” European Journal of Communication 33(7): 57–72.
Bratu, Roxana, Dmitri A. Sotiropoulos and Maya Stayonova. 2017. “Through the Lens of Social Constructionism: The Development of Innovative Anti-Corruption Policies and Practices in Bulgaria, Greece and Romania, 2000–2015.” Slavonic and East European Review 95(1): 117–150.
Casciano, Davide. 2021. “Popular tales of Pastors, Luxury, Frauds and Corruption: Pentecostalism, Conspicuous Consumption, and the Moral Economy of Corruption in Nigeria.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5(2): 52–71.
Císař, Ondřej. “Globální a lokální boje proti korubci: Případová studie Transparency International.” Politologický časopis / Czech Journal of Political Science 10(3): 221–242.
Dardot, Pierre, Christian Laval. 2014. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London: Verso.
Fertikh, Karim. 2014. “The Political Programme as Genre. The Sociology of Producing Party Programmes.” Revue française de science politique 64(5): 905–928.
Florini, Ann. 2007. The right to know: Transparency for an open world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gupta, Akhil. 1995. “Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state.” American Ethnologist 22(2): 375–402.
Havlík, Vlastimil. 2019. “Technocratic populism and political illiberalism in central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66(6): 369–384.
Heywood, Andrew. 2003. Political Ideologies: An Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chytilek, Roman and Petra Svačinová. 2019. “Parties of political entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Unfolding tale of multifaceted actors.” Pp. 211–239. in Political Corruption in a World in Transition, edited by Jonathan Mendilow and Éric Phélippeau. Vernon Press
Jørgensen, Marianne and Louise J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
Kajsiu, Blendi. 2013. “The birth of corruption and the politics of anti-corruption in Albania, 1991–2005.” Nationalities Papers 41(6), 1008–1025.
Kajsiu, Blendi. 2020. ¿Corrupción pública o privada? La dimensión ideológica de los discursos anti-corrupción en Colombia, Ecuador y Albania. Bogotá: Tirant lo Blanch.
Kajsiu, Blendi. 2021. “Public or Private Corruption? The Ideological Dimensions of Anti-Corruption Discourses in Colombia, Ecuador and Albania.” Journal of Extreme Anthropology 5(2): 27–51.
Kiss, Tamás and István Gergö Székely. 2022. “Populism on the semi-periphery: Some considerations for understanding the anti-corruption discourse in Romania.” Problems of Post-Communism 69(6): 514–527.
Kosík, Stanislav, Jan Souček and Jan Zátorský. 1996. “Organizovaný zločin v České republice.” Kriminalistika 29(1): 5–24
Kubbe, Ina and Miranda Loli. 2020. “Corruption and populism: the linkage” Pp. 118–131 in A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption, edited by Alina Mungiu-Pippidi and Paul Heywood. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kupka, Petr and Michal Mochťak. 2015. “The Nagygate Affair, Corruption and Organized Crime: Corruption Networks and their Potential Impact on the Quality of Democracy in the Czech Republic.” World Political Science 11(1): 157–185.
Kupka, Petr and Vendula Divišová. 2022. “Postihování organizovaného zločinu v Česku: nezákonné aktivity, pachatelé a jejich trestání v pravomocných rozsudcích českých soudů.” Česká kriminologie 6(1): 1–34.
Kupka, Petr, Václav Walach and Vendula Divišová. 2022. “From legal definitions to ethnic identities: Representations of organized crime in Czech policy documents.” Trends in Organized Crime (on-line first).
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1984. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” Pp. 32–50 in Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Francisco Panizza. London: Verso.
Lambropoulou, Effi. 2012. “Corruption discourse as a wild card: Politics and Media in Greece and the “modern” triumphalism of anti-corruption.” In The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe, edited by Dirk Tänzler, Konstadinos Mras, and Angelos Giannaopulos. Routledge.
Ledeneva, Alena, Roxana Bratu, and Philipp Köker. 2017. “Corruption Studies for the Twenty-First Century: Paradigm Shifts and Innovative Approaches.” Slavonic and East European Review 95(1): 1–20.
Ledeneva, Alena. 2009. “Corruption in Postcommunist Societies: A Re-examination.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10(1): 69–86.
Markovska, Anna and Alexey Serdyuk. 2014. “Analysing media representation of corruption in Ukraine: who is panicking?” Pp. 121–138 in Corruption, greed and crime-money. Sleaze and shady economy in Europe and beyond, edited by Petrus C. van Duyne, Jeckie Harvey, Georgios A. Antonopoulos, Klaus von Lampe, Almir Maljević, and Anna Markovska. Wolf Legal Publishers.
Marquette, Heather. 2004. Corruption, Politics and Development: The Role of the World Bank. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The populist zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–563.
Naxera, Vladimír. 2021a. “‘Let us blow them down!’: Corruption as the subject of (non-)populist communication of the Czech Pirate Party.” Politics (on-line first).
Naxera, Vladimír. 2021b. Od kritiky postsocialistické privatizace po nástup protikorupčních hnutí: téma korupce v komunikaci aktérů polistopadové české politiky. Pilsen: University of West Bohemia Press.
Naxera, Vladimír. 2022. “Směrem k principům populistické komunikace? Téma korupce ve volebních programech českých politických stran.” Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 58(2): 181–204.
Nye, Joseph S. 1989. “Corruption and Political Development. A Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Pp. 963–984 in Political Corruption: A Handbook, edited by Arnold J. Heidenheimer, Michael Jonston, and Victor T. Levine. New Brunswick: Transition Publishers.
Otáhal, Tomáš. 2006. “Ekonomická analýza definice korupce.” Národohospodářský obzor 4(1): 50–60.
Paroubek, Jiří. 2011. Český Watergate. Komentovaná Kubiceho zpráva. Columbus.
Pavlova, Elena. 2020. “Corrupt governance: Self-defeating anti-corruption rhetoric and initiatives in Russia.” New Perspectives 28(2): 205–222.
Pierce, Steven. 2006. “Looking like a state: colonialism and the discourse of corruption in Northern Nigeria.” Comparative studies in society and history 48(4): 887–914.
Pinková Aneta and Jakub Jusko. 2021. “Experts and Questions: Exploring Perceptions of Corruption.” Politics in Central Europe 17(2): 317–345.
Plaček, Michal, František Ochrana, Gabriela Vacekova, Ivan Langr, and Milan Půček. 2021. “Shedding Light on Three “Moral Cancer” Cases From the Czech Republic: Corruption in Communist and Post-Communist Regimes.” Public Integrity (on-line first).
Plaček, Michal, Vladislav Valentinov, František Ochrana, Gabriela Vacekova, Ivan Langr, and Milan Půček. 2022. “The evolving perceptions of corruption in Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic.” Governance 35(2): 651–659.
Sampson, Steven. 2010. “The anti-corruption industry: from movement to institution.” Global Crime 11(2): 261–278.
Smith, Michael L. 2010. “Perceived corruption, distributive justice, and the legitimacy of the system of social stratification in the Czech Republic.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43(4): 439–451
Školník, Milan. 2021a. “Corruption and its impact on protest activities in post-communist Europe.” European Review 30(3): 393–407.
Školník, Milan. 2021. “Korupce v České republice – dosavadní stav bádání.” Acta Politologica 13(2): 22–38.
Smilov, Daniel and Rashko Dorosiev. “Corruption in Bulgaria: Contested Perceptions, Shared Disappointment.” Pp. 237–260 in The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe, edited by Dirk Tänzler, Konstadinos Mras, and Angelos Giannaopulos. Routledge.
Tänzler, Dirk, Konstadinos Maras, and Angelos Giannaopulos. 2012. “The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe: An Introduction.” In The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe, edited by Dirk Tänzler, Konstadinos Mras, and Angelos Giannaopulos. Routledge.
Tumber, Howard and Silvio R. Waisbord (eds.) 2004. Political Scandals and Media Across Democracies: Volumes I & II. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Vymětal, Petr. 2003. “Korupce.” Politologická revue / Czech Political Science Review 9(1): 3–33.
Vymětal, Petr. 2006. “Typologie korupce.” Pp. 13–30 in Korupce. Projevy a potírání v České republice a Evropské unii, edited by Břetislav Dančák, Vít Hloušek, and Vojtěch Šimíček. Brno: Mezinárodní politologický ústav.
Walter, John. 1988. “Law as an instrument of economic regulation: Economic crime in Czechoslovakia 1947–1987.” Review of Socialist Law 3(14): 209–239
Walters, William. 2008. “Anti-policy and anti-politics: Critical reflections on certain schemes to govern bad things.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 11(3): 267–288.
Wedel, Janine R. 2001. “"State" and "Private": Up against the Organizational Realities of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Trends in organized crime 7(1): 6–46.
Wedel, Janine R. 2012. “Rethinking corruption in an age of ambiguity.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 453–498.
Zbíral, Robert. 2010. “Kvantitativní analýza působení vyšetřovacích komisí Poslanecké sněmovny v letech 1996–2006.” Politologický časopis / Czech Journal of Political Science 10(1): 82–102.
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2023 Petr Kupka , Vladimír Naxera