Selecting the Chair of the Whistleblower Protection Office in Slovakia: “Fight Against Corruption” as the Last (and Only) Public Interest?
Based on an analysis of public hearings organised to select the Chair of the Office for the Protection of Whistleblowers in Slovakia, this study asks how the notions of “public interest” and “anti-social activity” have been interpreted and re-enacted, and what role the topic of corruption played in this process. The analysis reveals the tension between a narrow understanding of anti-social activity as corruption and its wider interpretation, which encompasses a broader notion of public interest. In fact, the hearing stimulated an exploration of larger ethico-political questions related to the role of the state in the protection of “the social”. Therefore, this article argues that the organisation of the hearing, and specifically its public dialogical character, led to a shift away from the strict anti-corruption framing of whistleblowing. Second, the article contributes to the theoretical debate on whistleblowing by emphasising the so far rather neglected institutional and relational elements.
anti-social activity, East-Central Europe, ethics, corruption, framing, public interest, whistleblowing
Abazi, Vigjilenca. 2016. “Trade Secrets and Whistleblower Protection in the European Union.” European Papers 1(3): 1061–1072.
Abbott, Owen. 2020. The Self, Relational Sociology, and Morality in Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing
Act. No. 307/2014 Coll. Zákon o niektorých opatreniach súvisiacich s oznamovaním protispoločenskej činnosti a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov [Act on Certain Measures Related to the Reporting of Anti-Social Activity and on Amendments to Certain Acts]. Retrieved April 8, 2022 (https://www.zakonypreludi.sk/zz/2014-307).
Act. No. 54/2019 Coll. Zákon o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov [Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers of Anti-Social Activities and on Amendments to Certain Acts]. Retrieved April 8, 2022 (https://www.zakonypreludi.sk/zz/2019-54).
Baroš, Radovan. 2013. “Doslov k českému vydání. [Afterword to the Czech Edition].” Pp. 231–274 in Konec postkomunismu: Od společnosti bez naděje k naději bez společnosti [The End of Post-communism: From a Society without Hope to Hope without Society] by Boris Buden. Praha: Rybka Publishers.
Buden, Boris. 2013. Konec postkomunismu: Od společnosti bez naděje k naději bez společnosti [The End of Post-Communism: From a Society without Hope to Hope without Society]. Praha: Rybka Publishers.
Cassematis, Peter G. and Richard Wortley. 2013. “Prediction of Whistleblowing or Non-reporting Observation: The Role of Personal and Situational Factors.” Journal of Business Ethics 117(3): 615–634.
Contu, Alessia. 2014. “Rationality and Relationality in the Process of Whistleblowing: Recasting Whistleblowing Through Readings of Antigone.” Journal of Management Inquiry 23(4): 393–406.
Culiberg, Barbara and Katarina Katja Mihelič. 2017. “The Evolution of Whistleblowing Studies: A Critical Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Business Ethics 146(4): 787–803.
Du Plessis, Erik Mygind. 2020. “Speaking Truth through Power: Conceptualizing Internal Whistleblowing Hotlines with Foucault’s Dispositive.” Organization. Online First. Retrieved 8 April, 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420984019).
EU Trade Secrets Directive. 2016. Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the Protection of Undisclosed Know-How and Business Information (Trade Secrets) Against Their Unlawful Acquisition, Use and Disclosure. Retrieved April 4, 2022 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016L0943&rid=4).
EU Whistleblowing Directive. 2019. Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of Union Law. Retrieved April, 4, 2022 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1937).
European Parliament 2017a. European Parliament Resolution of 14 February 2017 on the Role of Whistleblowers in the Protection of EU’s Financial Interests (2016/2055(INI)). Retrieved April 8, 2022 (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/56e338e3-8a62-11e8-ac6a-01aa75ed71a1).
European Parliament 2017b. European Parliament Resolution of 24 October 2017 on Legitimate Measures to Protect Whistle-Blowers Acting in the Public Interest When Disclosing the Confidential Information of Companies and Public Bodies (2016/2224(INI)). Retrieved April 8, 2022 (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5c4565d3-c1ea-11e8-8bb4-01aa75ed71a1)
Foucault, Michel. 2003. “What is Critique?” Pp. 263–278 in The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose. New York: New Press.
Gagnon, Marilou and Amélie Perron. 2020. “Whistleblowing: A Concept Analysis.” Nursing and Health Sciences 22(2): 381–389.
Koopmans, Ruud and Paul Statham. 1999. “Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Analysis.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 4(2): 203–221.
Mansbach, Abraham. 2007. “Political Surplus of Whistleblowing: A Case Study.” Business Ethics: A European Review 16(2): 124–131.
Mansbach, Abraham. 2009. “Keeping Democracy Vibrant: Whistleblowing as Truth-Telling in the Workplace.” Constellations 16(3): 363–376.
Nader, Ralph, Peter J. Petkas, and Kate Blackwell. 1972. Whistle Blowing: The Report of the Conference on Professional Responsibility. New York: Grossman Publishers.
Office of the Government of the Slovak Republic. 2019. Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov [Office for the Protection of Whistleblowers]. Retrieved 8 April, 2022 (https://www.bojprotikorupcii.gov.sk/urad-na-ochranu-oznamovatelov/).
Snow, David A. 2004. “Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields” Pp. 380–412 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi. Malden: Blackwell Publishig Ltd.
Teo, Hayden and Donella Caspersz. 2011. “Dissenting Discourse: Exploring Alternatives to the Whistleblowing/Silence Dichotomy.” Journal of Business Ethics 104(2): 237–249.
Thomas, R. Guy. 2020. “Whistleblowing and Power: A Network Perspective.” Business Ethics 29(4): 842–855.
Ivančík, Ján, Gabriel Šipoš, and Zuzana Grochalová. 2019. “As the Director of New Whistleblowing Office We Recommend Martin Rajňák.” Transparency International Slovakia. Retrieved 8 April 2022 (https://transparency.sk/en/za-sefa-noveho-uradu-na-ochranu-whistleblowerov-odporucame-martina-rajnaka/).
Vandekerckhove, Wim. 2006. Whistleblowing and Organizational Social Responsibility. A Global Assessment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Vandekerckhove, Wim. 2016. “Freedom of Expression as the ‘Broken Promise’ of Whistleblower Protection.” La Revue des droits de l’homme 10(1): 1–18.
Vandekerckhove, Wim. 2021. “Is It Freedom? The Coming About of the EU Directive on Whistleblower Protection.” Journal of Bussiness Ethics. Online First. Retrieved April 8 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04771-x).
Vandekerckhove, Wim and Langenberg Suzan. 2012. “Can We Organize Courage? Implications from Foucault’s Parrhesia.” Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies 17(2): 35–44.
Weiskopf, Richard and Yvonne Tobias-Miersch. 2016. “Whistleblowing, Parrhesia and the Contestation of Truth in the Workplace.” Organization Studies 37(11): 1621–1640.
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2022 Petr Mezihorák