Síťová analýza v právu: Síťové metody a jejich využití pro získávání a vyhledávání právních informací

Roč.12,č.24(2021)

Tereza Novotná

https://doi.org/10.5817/RPT2021-2-2

PDF
Abstrakt
Tento článek si dává za cíl přinést přehled využití metod síťové analýzy v právu a diskutovat využití těchto metod pro vyhledávání právních informací. Za tímto účelem obsahuje teoretický základ fungování síťové analýzy, těžiště článku však leží spíše v kategorizaci způsobů využití této metody při aplikaci na právní prameny. Účelem přehledu je pak zdůraznit odlišnosti této metody od ostatních statistických metod a zejména vyzdvihnout její výhody. Na základě těchto závěrů pak autorka diskutuje vhodnost využití síťových metod pro jednodušší a obecně přístupnější vyhledávání právních informací a navrhuje některé konkrétní metody, jak by síťová analýza mohla pomoct v práci s právními informacemi.

Klíčová slova:
Síťová analýza; vyhledávání právních informací; statistické metody v právu; vizualizace právních informací

Stránky:
s. 39–76
Reference

  1. ALBERT, M. B., D. AVERY, F. NARIN a P. MCALLISTER. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy [online]. 20(3), 1991, s. 251–259. ISSN 0048-7333. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-U.
  2. ASHLEY, Kevin D. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. ISBN 978-1-107-17150-3. DOI: 10.1017/9781316761380.
  3. ATHEY, Nicholas C. a Martin BOUCHARD. The BALCO scandal: the social structure of a steroid distribution network. Global Crime. 14(2–3), 2013, s. 216–237. ISSN 1744-0572.
  4. BOMMARITO, Michael J. a Daniel M. KATZ, 2010. A mathematical approach to the study of the United States Code. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications [online]. 389(19), 4195–4200. ISSN 0378-4371. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.physa.2010.05.057.
  5. BOUCHARD, Martin et al. Criminal Careers in Cyberspace: Examining Website Failure within Child Exploitation Networks. Justice Quarterly: Vol 33, No 7 [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07418825.2015.1046393.
  6. BOULET, Romain, Pierre MAZZEGA a Daniele BOURCIER, 2011. A network approach to the French system of legal codes—part I: analysis of a dense network. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 19(4), 333–355.
  7. BOULET, Romain, Pierre MAZZEGA a Danièle BOURCIER, 2018. Network approach to the French system of legal codes part II: the role of the weights in a network. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 26(1), 23–47.
  8. BRADLEY, Robert E. a C. Edward SANDIFER. Leonhard Euler: Life, Work and Legacy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, 534 s. ISBN 978-0-444-52728-8.
  9. BRANDES, Ulrik. Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005. ISBN 978-3-540-24979-5.
  10. CALDARELLI, Guido et al. A Network Analysis of Countries’ Export Flows: Firm Grounds for the Building Blocks of the Economy. PLOS ONE. 2012, roč. 7, č. 10, s. e47278. ISSN 1932-6203. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047278.
  11. CARLUCCI, Lucia, CIANI, Gianfranco a Davide M. PROSERPIO. Polycatenation, polythreading and polyknotting in coordination network chemistry. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2003, sv. 246, č. 1-2, s. 247–289.
  12. CARRINGTON, Peter J., John SCOTT a Stanley WASSERMAN, eds. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. ISBN 978-0-521-80959-7. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511811395.
  13. CLARK, Tom S. a Benjamin E. LAUDERDALE. The Genealogy of Law. Political Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2012, roč. 20, č. 3, s. 329–350. ISSN 1047-1987, 1476-4989. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps019.
  14. CONRAD, Jack G., Khalid AL-KOFAHI, Ying ZHAO a George KARYPIS, 2005. Effective document clustering for large heterogeneous law firm collections. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law [online]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, s. 177–187 [vid. 2021-01-10]. ICAIL ’05. ISBN 978-1-59593-081-1. Dostupné z: doi:10.1145/1165485.1165513.
  15. COOK, K. S. a J. M. WHITMEYER. Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis. Annual Review of Sociology. 1992, roč. 18, č. 1, s. 109–127. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000545.
  16. CROSS, Frank B. a kol. Citations in the U.S. Supreme Court: an Empirical Study of Their Use and Significance. University Illinois Law Review. No. 2, 2010, s. 491. Dostupné z: http://illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2010/2/Cross.pdf.
  17. DAHLIN, Kristina, Margaret TAYLOR a Mark FICHMAN. Today’s Edisons or weekend hobbyists: technical merit and success of inventions by independent inventors. Research Policy [online]. 33(8), 2004, s. 1167–1183. ISSN 0048-7333. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.003.
  18. DE NOOY, Wouter, Andrej MRVAR a Vladimir BATAGELJ. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software. 3. vyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. ISBN 978-1-108-47414-6. DOI: 10.1017/9781108565691.
  19. DEGENNE, Alain a Michel FORSÉ. Introducing Social Networks. London: SAGE Publications, 1999, 256 s. ISBN 0 7619 5603 4.
  20. DERLÉN, Mattias a Johan LINDHOLM, 2015. Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions [online]. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2677555. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network [vid. 2018-10-23]. Dostupné z: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2677555.
  21. DERLÉN, Mattias a Johan LINDHOLM, 2017. Is it Good Law? Network Analysis and the CJEU’s Internal Market Jurisprudence. Journal of International Economic Law [online]. 20(2), 257–277. ISSN 1369-3034, 1464-3758. Dostupné z: doi:10.1093/jiel/jgx011.
  22. DICKEN, Peter et al. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks. 2001, roč. 1, č. 2, s. 89–112. ISSN 1471-0374. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0374.00007.
  23. EMIRBAYER, Mustafa a Jeff GOODWIN. Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency. American Journal of Sociology. 1994, roč. 99, č. 6, s. 1411–1454. ISSN 0002-9602. DOI: 10.1086/230450.
  24. FARLEY, Jonathan David. Breaking Al Qaeda Cells: A Mathematical Analysis of Counterterrorism Operations (A Guide for Risk Assessment and Decision Making). Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: Vol 26, No 6 [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10576100390242857.
  25. FLEMING, Lee a Olav SORENSON. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy [online]. 30(7), 2001, s. 1019–1039. ISSN 0048-7333. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9.
  26. FOWLER, James H. a Sangick JEON. The authority of Supreme Court precedent. Social Networks [online]. 30(1), 16–30, 2008. ISSN 03788733. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.05.001.
  27. FOWLER, James H., Timothy R. JOHNSON, James F. SPRIGGS, Sangick JEON a Paul J. WAHLBECK. Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis [online]. 15(3), 324–346, 2007. ISSN 1047-1987, 1476-4989. Dostupné z: doi:10.1093/pan/mpm011.
  28. GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. B.m.: Isi Press, 1979, s. 37 - 40. ISBN 978-0-89495-024-7.
  29. GEIST, Anton. The Open Revolution: Using Citation Analysis to Improve Legal Text Retrieval. European Journal of Legal Studies. 2008, roč. 2, č. 3, s. 137–145.
  30. GEIST, Anton. Using Citation Analysis Techniques For Computer-Assisted Legal Research in Continental Jurisdictions, Graduate thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2009. Available at: http//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRNID1397674_codelO8708O.pdf?abstractid=1 397674&mirid=1.
  31. GÓRSKI, Lukasz. Towards Legal Change Analysis: Clustering of Polish Civil Code Amendments [online]. CEUR-WS.org, 2019. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Dostupné z: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2385/paper11.pdf.
  32. GRANOVETTER, Mark. Social Structures: A Network Approach. In: WELLMAN, Barry a BERKOWITZ, S. D. (eds.). Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 513 s. ISBN 9780521286879.
  33. HARAŠTA, Jakub, Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ, Tereza NOVOTNÁ, Jaromír ŠAVELKA, Radim POLČÁK, František KASL, Pavel LOUTOCKÝ a Jakub MÍŠEK. Citační analýza judikatury. 1. vydání. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2021. 256 s. Právní monografie. ISBN 978-80-7598-749-5.
  34. HARAŠTA, Jakub. Srovnávací studie právních informačních systémů: rozdíly mezi systémy při využití různých vyhledávacích strategií. Revue pro právo a technologie. Masarykova univerzita, 2020, roč. 11, č. 22, s. 219-260. ISSN 1804-5383. doi:10.5817/RPT2020-2-8.
  35. HEINZ, John P. a Edward O. LAUMANN. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar [online]. Russell Sage Foundation, 1982 [cit. 06.10.2021]. ISBN 978-0-87154-378-3. Dostupné z: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442848.
  36. HEINZ, John P., Edward O. LAUMANN a Robert L. NELSON. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Harvard University Press, 1993. ISBN 978-0-674-40525-7.
  37. HORVATH, Steve. Weighted Network Analysis: Applications in Genomics and Systems Biology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4419-8818-8. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8819-5.
  38. KAHLER, Miles. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Cornell University Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0-8014-5764-7.
  39. KATZ, Daniel M. a Derek K. STAFFORD. Hustle and Flow: A Social Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary. Ohio State Law Journal. 2010, č. 3, s. 457–510.
  40. KIPLING, Airlin L. a Michael THOMPSON. Network Analysis Methods Applied to Liquid­‑phase Acoustic Wace Sensors. Analytical Chemistry, 1990, roč. 62, č. 14, s. 1514–1519.
  41. KONIARIS, Marios, Ioannis ANAGNOSTOPOULOS a Yannis VASSILIOU, 2017. Network Analysis in the Legal Domain: A complex model for European Union legal sources. Journal of Complex Networks. 6(2), 243–268.
  42. KUMAR, Ravi V. and RAGHUVEER, K. Legal Documents Clustering using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. International Journal of Applied Information Systems. 2(6):27-33, 2012.
  43. KUPPEVELT, Dafne VAN a Gijs VAN DIJCK, 2017. Answering Legal Research Questions About Dutch Case Law with Network Analysis and Visualization. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2017: The Thirtieth Annual Conference. B.m.: IOS Press, s. 95.
  44. LAZEGA, Emmanuel a Marijtje VAN DUIJN. Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Social Networks. 1997, roč. 19, č. 4, s. 375–397. ISSN 0378-8733. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00006-3.
  45. LAZEGA, Emmanuel. The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 978-0-19-924272-6. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242726.001.0001.
  46. LEIFELD, Philip. Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics. Policy Studies Journal. 2013, roč. 41, č. 1, s. 169–198. ISSN 1541-0072. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12007.
  47. LEIGHTON, Barry. The Community Concept in Criminology: Toward a Social Network Approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency [online]. 25(4), s. 351–374, 1988. ISSN 0022-4278. Dostupné z: doi:10.1177/0022427888025004003.
  48. LINCOLN, James R., Michael L. GERLACH a Peggy TAKAHASHI. Keiretsu Networks in the Japanese Economy: A Dyad Analysis of Intercorporate Ties. American Sociological Review [JSTOR]. 1992, roč. 57, č. 5, s. 561–585. ISSN 0003-1224. DOI: 10.2307/2095913.
  49. LU, Qiang, Jack G. CONRAD, Khalid AL-KOFAHI a William KEENAN, 2011. Legal document clustering with built-in topic segmentation. In: the 20th ACM international conference: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM ’11 [online]. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: ACM Press, s. 383 [vid. 2021-01-09]. ISBN 978-1-4503-0717-8. Dostupné z: doi:10.1145/2063576.2063636.
  50. MALMGREN, Staffan. Towards a theory of jurisprudential relevance ranking. Using Link Analysis on EU Case Law. Graduate thesis, Stockholm University, 2011, 116 s.
  51. MARX, Stephen M. Citation Networks in the Law. Jurimetrics Journal. Vol. 10, 1979, s. 121-137.
  52. MERKL D. and SCHWEIGHOFER, Erich. En route to data mining in legal text corpora: Clustering, neural computation, and international treaties. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA ’97), 1997.
  53. MORSELLI, Carlo, Cynthia GIGUÈRE a Katia PETIT. The efficiency/security trade-off in criminal networks. Social Networks [online]. 29(1), 2007, s. 143–153. ISSN 0378-8733. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.05.001.
  54. NANDA, Rohan et al. Legal Information Retrieval Using Topic Clustering and Neural Networks [online]. In: Proceedings of COLIEE 2017. EPiC Series in Computing. Dostupné z: http://www.easychair.org/publications/paper/347228.
  55. NASH, Rebecca, Martin BOUCHARD a Aili MALM. Investing in people: The role of social networks in the diffusion of a large-scale fraud. Social Networks [online]. 35(4), 2013, s. 686–698. ISSN 0378-8733. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.06.005.
  56. NEALE, Thom. Citation Analysis of Canadian Case Law. Journal of Open Access to Law. 2013, roč. 1, s. 1–60.
  57. NEALE, Thom. Citation Analysis of Canadian Case Law. Journal of Open Access to Law. 2013, roč. 1, s. 1–60.
  58. OCELÍK, Petr et al. A contested transition toward a coal-free future: Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019, roč. 58, s. 101283. ISSN 2214-6296. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283.
  59. OTTE, Evelien a Ronald ROUSSEAU. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science. 2002, roč. 28, č. 6, s. 441–453. ISSN 0165-5515. DOI: 10.1177/016555150202800601.
  60. PANAGIS, Yannis, Urska SADL a Fabien TARISSAN, 2017. Giving every case its (legal) due The contribution of citation networks and text similarity techniques to legal studies of European Union law. In: 30th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX’17). B.m.: IOS Press, s. 59–68.
  61. POUDYAL, Prakash, Teresa GONÇALVES a Paulo QUARESMA. Using Clustering Techniques to Identify Arguments in Legal Documents [online]. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2019. Dostupné z: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2385/paper2.pdf.
  62. SCOTT, John. TREND REPORT SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS. Sociology [JSTOR]. 1988, roč. 22, č. 1, s. 109–127. ISSN 0038-0385.
  63. SMITH, David A. a Douglas R. WHITE. Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980. Social Forces. 1992, roč. 70, č. 4, s. 857–893. ISSN 0037-7732. DOI: 10.1093/sf/70.4.857.
  64. SMITH, Thomas A. The Web of Law. San Diego Legal Studies Research. Paper No. 06-11, 2005. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfmabstract-id=642863.
  65. SUSSKIND, Richard E. The Future of Law: Facing the Challenges of Information Technology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, 309 s. ISBN 978-0-19-876496-0.
  66. TAPPER, Colin. The Use of Citation Vectors for Legal Information Retrieval. Journal of Law & Information Science. Vol. 1, No. 2, 1981, s. 131- 161.
  67. TIAN, Xin et al. K-Means Clustering for Controversial Issues Merging in Chinese Legal Texts. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. IOS Press, 2018, s. 215–219. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-215
  68. UZZI, Brian a Ryon LANCASTER. Embeddedness and Price Formation in the Corporate Law Market. American Sociological Review. SAGE Publications Inc, 2004, roč. 69, č. 3, s. 319–344. ISSN 0003-1224. DOI: 10.1177/000312240406900301.
  69. VAN OPIJNEN, Marc a Cristiana SANTOS. On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2017, roč. 25, č. 1, s. 65–87. ISSN 1572-8382. DOI: 10.1007/s10506-017-9195-8.
  70. VAN OPIJNEN, Marc. A model for automated rating of case law. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL ’13, Rome, Italy: ACM Press, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4503-2080-1. DOI: 10.1145/2514601.2514617.
  71. VENKATESH, Ravi kumar. Legal Documents Clustering and Summarization using Hierarchical Latent Dirichlet Allocation. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI). 2013, roč. 2, č. 1, s. 27–35. ISSN 2252-8938.
  72. WAGH, R. a D. ANAND, 2017. Application of citation network analysis for improved similarity index estimation of legal case documents : A study. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing (ICCTAC): 2017 IEEE International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing (ICCTAC) [online]. s. 1–5. Dostupné z: doi:10.1109/ICCTAC.2017.8249996.
  73. WASSERMAN, Stanley a Katherine FAUST. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 825 s. ISBN 9780521387071.
  74. WATTS, Duncan J. Six Degress: the Science of Connected Age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2003, 368 s. ISBN 9780099444961.
  75. WHALEN, Ryan. Legal Networks: The Promises and Challenges of Legal Network Analysis. Michigan State Law Review. 2016, roč. 2016, s. 539.
  76. WHALEN, Ryan. Modeling Annual Supreme Court Influence: The Role of Citation Practices and Judicial Tenure in Determining Precedent Network Growth. In: Ronaldo MENEZES, Alexandre EVSUKOFF a Marta C. GONZÁLEZ, ed. Complex Networks [online]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Studies in Computational Intelligence, s. 169–176, 2013 [vid. 2019-10-06]. ISBN 978-3-642-30287-9. Dostupné z: doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30287-9_18.
  77. WINKELS, Radboud, Jelle RUYTER a Henryk KROESE. Determining Authority of Dutch Case Law [online]. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2013190. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2011. Dostupné z: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2013190.
  78. WOLFE, Alvin W. Anthropologist view of social network analysis and data mining. Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2011, roč. 1, č. 1, s. 3–19. ISSN 1869-5469. DOI: 10.1007/s13278-010-0014-4.
  79. WOLFE, Alvin W. The rise of network thinking in anthropology. Social Networks. 1978, roč. 1, č. 1, s. 53–64. ISSN 0378-8733. DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90012-6.
  1. POLČÁK, Radim. Internet a proměny práva. 1. vyd. Praha: Auditorium, 2012, 388 s. ISBN 978-80-87284-22-3.
  1. RÜCKER, Gerta. Network meta¬ analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Research Synthesis Methods, 2012, roč. 3, č. 4, s. 312–324.
  2. SCOTT, John. Social Network Analysis. 4th Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2017, 248 s. ISBN: 9781473952126.

Metriky

1

Crossref logo

0

303

Views

160

PDF views

Creative Commons License

Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0.

Copyright © 2021 Tereza Novotná

PDF