VALIDACE TERÉNNÍHO RENTGEN-FLUORESCENČNÍHO SPEKTROMETRU PRO POTŘEBY ANALÝZ PŮD, ŘÍČNÍCH SEDIMENTŮ A SUSPENDOVANÉ HMOTY

Vol.16,(2009)

Abstract

The portable X-ray-fluorescence analyser is being used for Ag, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Se, Sn, Sr, Ti, U, V, Zn a Zr. There is an Alpha model (Innov-X Systems, Inc) used at the Czech Geological Survey for geological mapping, contamination of the soil, stream sediment or vegetation and for geochemical purposes and environmental mapping. For the measurement the total amount of sample with 10–30 g of material was used, it means such amount of material which can cover in large measure the window of the instrument. The thickness of the measured layer varies from 3 to 20 mm. For the study purposes 100 samples was analyzed including 20 reference laboratory samples. Its specification is presented in Table 1. To compare both sets of samples the whole rock analysis of duplicate samples has to be mesasured and this kind of analysis was provided by Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd., Canada. The results shows that correlation between measurement based on XRF method and reference materials or classic laboratory measurements corresponds in a good way. The most of the evaluated components reaches acceptable relative errors by precision of the measurement. Using this instrument makes the process of samples selection for the regional environmental research or core samples measurement much easier. In a short period we can analyze the wide spectrum of components under the low cost budget.


Keywords:
rentgen-fluorescence; portable XRF; soil; stream sediment; suspended particulare matter
References

Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (2008): AcmeLabs. Services & Fees 2008. – Acme analytical laboratories Ltd., 36 p., Vancouver B.C.
Bernick, M. B. – Getty, D. – Prince, G. – Sprenger, M. (1995): Statistical evaluation of fi eld-portable X-ray fluorescence soil preparation methods. – Journal of Hazardous Materials, 43, 111–116.
Fišera, M. – Juna, M. – Mihaljevič, M. – Pokorný, J. – Rubeška, I. – Sixta, V. – Šulcek, Z. – Veselý, J. (2003): Analytical methods. – In: Pašava, J. – Kříbek, B. (2003): Geochemical Prospecting Methods and Th eir Environmental Aplications. – Textbook of Geochim postgradual training course, Czech geological survey Prague.
Govindaraju, K. (1994): Compilation of working values and sample description for 383 geostandards. – Geostandards Newsletter 18, SI, 1–158.
Harper, M. – Pacolay, B. – Hintz, P. – Bartley, D. L. – Slaven, J. E. – Andrew, M. E. (2007): Portable XRF analysis of occupational air filter samples from different workplaces using diff erent samplers: final results, summary and conclusions. – J Environ Monit. 2007 Nov; 9 (11): 1263–70. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
Hewitt, A. D. (1995): Rapid screening of metals using portable high resolution X-ray fluorescence spectrometers. – Online dokument: http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/techpub/CRREL_Reports/reports/SR95_14.pdf.
Innow-X Systems, Inc. (2005): Innov-X systens Alpha Series™, rentgenový fluorescenční spektrometr. – Manuál, ver. 2.1, srpen 2005, 1–66. Woburn.
Kalnicky, J. D. – Singhvi, R. (2001): Field portable XRF analysis of environmental samples. – Journal of Hazardous Materials, 83, 93–122.
Kilbridge, C. – Poole, J. – Hutchings, T. R. (2006): A comparison of Cu, Pb, As, Cd, Zn, Fe, Ni and Mn determined by acid extraction/ICP–OES and ex situ field portable X-ray fluorescence analyses. – Environmental Pollution, 143, 16–23.
Mäkinen, E. – Korhonen, M. – Viskari, E. L. – Haapamäki, S. – Järvinen, M. – Lu, L. (2005): Comparison of XRF and FAAS methods in analysing CCA contaminated soils. – Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 171, 95–110.

Metrics

470

Views

185

PDF (Čeština) views