Does parental similarity degree affect the development of their offspring?
Bd.13,Nr.1(2022)
Anthropologia integra
Similarity in facial and other physical characteristics has been recognized as one aspect of reproductive mate choice in humans. Despite the fact that parental similarity degree may affect offspring already in the early stages of their prenatal development, just a very few empirical studies have focused on the consequences of this non-random process so far. This study included three goals: (1) to test the hypothesis of body assortative mating in humans, (2) to find a relationship between physical similarity of parents and the growth curves of their offspring and (3) to find out how parental similarity affects the growth of offspring. Therefore, the similarities of parents in physical features were analysed in relation to the descriptors of the growth curves of their offspring (n = 184 mother-father-child triads from the Brno Growth Study database). In comparison to randomly generated pairs, real partners were not more similar to each other in any of the observed trait. However, some physical features correlated (mostly positively) between partners. Relationships between physical similarity of parents and the descriptors of the growth curves of their offspring were found. However, parental similarity in various features affected the growth of their offspring differently.
assortative mating; non-random mating; mate choice; preferences; similarity; human face; growth curve; offspring
Adams, D. C. – Collyer, M. L. – Kaliontzopoulou, A. (2020): Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.2.1. (online). https://cran.r-project.org/package=geomorph
Alvarez, L. – Jaffe, K. (2004): Narcissism Guides Mate Selection: Humans Mate Assortatively, as Revealed by Facial Resemblance, following an Algorithm of “Self Seeking Like”. Evolutionary Psychology. 2(1), 177–194. https://doi:10.1177/147470490400200123
Bateson, P. P. G. (1983): Optimal outbreeding. In: Bateson, P., ed. Mate Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 462.
Bouchalová, M. (1987): Vývoj během dětství a jeho ovlivnění. Brněnská růstová studie. Praha: Avicenum. 383.
Buss, D. M. (2016): Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Fifth edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 496.
Buston, P. M. – Emlen, S. T. (2003): Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100(15), 8805–8810. https://doi:10.1073/pnas.1533220100
Debruine, L. M. (2005): Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 272(1566), 919–922. https://doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3003
Dryden, I. L. (2019): shapes: Statistical Shape Analysis. R package version 1.2.5. (online). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shapes
Edwards, R. D. – Roff, J. (2016): What mom and dad’s match means for junior: Marital sorting and child outcomes. Labour Economics. 40, 43–56. https://doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2016.04.005
Epstein, E. – Guttman, R. (1984): Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Biodemography and Social Biology. 31(3–4), 243–278. https://doi:10.1080/19485565.1984.9988579
Figueredo, A. J. – Wolf, P. S. A. (2009): Assortative Pairing and Life History Strategy: A Cross-Cultural Study. Human Nature. 20(3), 317–330. https://doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9068-2
George, D. – Luo, S. – Webb, J. – Pugh, J. – Martinez, A. – Foulston, J. (2015): Couple similarity on stimulus characteristics and marital satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences. 86, 126–131. https://doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.005
Godoy, R. – Eisenberg, D. T. A. – Reyes-García, V. – Huanca, T. – Leonard, W. R. – Mcdade, T. W. –Tanner, S. (2008): Assortative mating and offspring well-being: theory and empirical findings from a native Amazonian society in Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior. 29(3), 201–210. https://doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.003
Guo, G. – Wang, L. – Liu, H. – Randall, T. (2014): Genomic Assortative Mating in Marriages in the United States. PLoS ONE. 9(11), 1–14. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112322
Hales, C. N. – Barker, D. J. P. (1992): Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia. 35, 595–601. https://doi:10.1093/bmb/60.1.5
Hamilton, W. D. (1964): The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7(1), 1–16. https://doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
Harrell, F. E. (2021): Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.5-0. (online).
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc
Hur, Y.-M. (2003): Assortative Mating for Personality Traits, Educational Level, Religious Affiliation, Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index in Parents of a Korean Twin Sample. Twin Research. 6(6), 467–470. https://doi:10.1375/136905203322686446
Jacobson, P. M. – Torgerson, J. S. – Sjöström, L. O. – Bouchard, C. (2006): Spouse resemblance in body mass index: effects on adult obesity prevalence in the offspring generation. American journal of epidemiology. 165(1), 101–108. https://doi:10.1093/aje/kwj342
Klíma, O. – Čuta, M. – Polcerová, L. – Zemčík, P. – Škultétyová, A. – Černý, D. – Králík, M. (2021): GROWTH: Functional Data Analysis of the human height postnatal growth in an on-line application. Anthropologia integra. 12(2), 7–17. https://doi:10.5817/AI2021-2-7
Kocsor, F. – Rezneki, R. – Juhász, S. – Bereczkei, T. (2011): Preference for Facial Self-Resemblance and Attractiveness in Human Mate Choice. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 40(6), 1263–1270. https://doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9723-z
Koníková, L. (2021): The role of body assortative mating of parents in development of their offspring. Brno. Diploma Thesis. Masaryk University. https://is.muni.cz/auth/th/aig06/DP_Konikova_FINAL.pdf
Kościński, K. (2007): Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropological Review. 70(1), 45–79. https://doi:10.2478/v10044-008-0001-9
Králík, M. – Klíma, O. – Čuta, M. – Malina, R. M. – Kozieł, S. – Polcerová, L. – Škultétyová, A. – Španěl, M. – Kukla, L. – Zemčík, P. (2021): Estimating Growth in Height from Limited Longitudinal Growth Data Using Full-Curves Training Dataset: A Comparison of Two Procedures of Curve Optimization—Functional Principal Component Analysis and SITAR. Children. 8(10), 934. https://doi:10.3390/children8100934
Little, A. C. – Burt, D. M. – Perrett, D. I. (2006): Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 40(5), 973–984. https://doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.016
Low, N. – Cui, L. – Merikangas, K. R. (2007): Spousal concordance for substance use and anxiety disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 41(11), 942–951. https://doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.11.003
Lucas, A. (1991): Programming by early nutrition in man. The Childhood Environment and Adult Disease. CIBA Foundation Symposium 156, 38–55. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Luo, S. (2017): Assortative mating and couple similarity: Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 11(8), 1–14. https://doi:10.1111/spc3.12337
Miller, G. F. (1998): How Mate Choice shaped Human Nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In: C. Crawford, D. Krebs (eds.). Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. 1–41. https://bit.ly/3oNyCq9
Ochoa, G. – Jaffé, K. (1999): On Sex, Mate Selection and the Red Queen. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 199(1), 1–9. https://doi:10.1006/jtbi.1999.0931
Pearson, K. (1903): Assortative Mating in Man: A Cooperative Study. Biometrika. 2(4), 481–498. https://doi:10.2307/2331510
Penton-Voak, I. S. – Perrett, D. I. – Peirce, J. W. (1999): Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgements of attractiveness. Current Psychology. 18(1), 104–117. https://doi:10.1007/s12144-999-1020-4
Pohlert, T. (2022): _PMCMRplus: Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums Extended_. R package version 1.9.4 (online). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMRplus
R Core Team (2020): R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. (online). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Ramsay, J. O. – Graves, S. – Hooker, G. (2020): fda: Functional Data Analysis. R package version 5.1.9. (online). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fda
Roberts, S. C. – Little, A. C. (2008): Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica. 132(3), 309–321. https://doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9174-1
Rohlf, F. J. (2017): TpsDig2 2.31 [software]. (online). http://www.sbmorphometrics.org/
Rohlf, F. J. (2019): Tps Utility program 1.78 [software]. (online). http://www.sbmorphometrics.org/
Rushton, J. P. – Russell, R. J. H. – Wells, P. A. (1984): Genetic similarity theory: Beyond kin selection. Behavior Genetics. 14(3), 179–193. https://doi:10.1007/BF01065540
Rushton, J. P. (1988): Genetic similarity, mate choice, and fecundity in humans. Ethology and Sociobiology. 9(6), 329–333. https://doi:10.1016/0162-3095(88)90025-8
Speakman, J. R. – Djafarian, K. – Stewart, J. – Jackson, D. M. (2007): Assortative mating for obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 86(2), 316–323. https://doi:10.1093/ajcn/86.2.316
Spuhler, J. N. (1968): Assortative mating with respect to physical characteristics. Eugenics Quarterly. 15(2), 128–140. https://doi:10.1080/19485565.1968.9987763
Thiessen, D. – Gregg, B. (1980): Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1(2), 111–140. https://doi:10.1016/0162-3095(80)90003-5
Thiessen, D. – Young, R. K. – Delgado, M. (1997): Social pressures for assortative mating. Personality and Individual Differences. 22(2), 157–164. https://doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00181-X
Todd, P. M. – Penke, L. – Fasolo, B. – Lenton, A. P. (2007): Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104(38), 15011–15016. https://doi:10.1073/pnas.0705290104
Urbanová, P. – Ferková, Z. – Jandová, M. – Jurda, M. – Černý, D. – Sochor, J. (2018): Introducing the FIDENTIS 3D Face Database. Anthropological Review. 81(2), 202–223.
https://doi:10.2478/anre-2018-0016
Watson, D. – Klohnen, E. C. – Casillas, A. – Simms, N. – Haig, J. – Berry, D. S. (2004): Match Makers and Deal Breakers: Analyses of Assortative Mating in Newlywed Couples. Journal of Personality. 72(5), 1029–1068. https://bit.ly/3wBtWWL
Wells, J. C. K. (2003): The Thrifty Phenotype Hypothesis: Thrifty Offspring or Thrifty Mother? Journal of Theoretical Biology. 221, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2003.3183
Wolanski, N. – Siniarska, A. (1984): Species module and assortative mating in man. Journal of Human Evolution. 13(3), 247–253. https://doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(84)80009-3
Wolf, P. S. A. – Figueredo, A. J. (2011): Fecundity, Offspring Longevity, and Assortative Mating: Parametric Tradeoffs in Sexual and Life History Strategy. Biodemography and Social Biology. 57(2), 171–183. https://doi:10.1080/19485565.2011.614569
Wong, Y. K. – Wong, W. W. – Lui, K. F. H. – Wong, A. C.-N. (2018): Revisiting facial resemblance in couples. PLOS ONE. 13(1), 1–12. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191456
Wu, R. – Liu, Z. – Guo, Q. – Cai, M. – Zhou, J. (2019): Couple Similarity on Personality, Moral Identity and Spirituality Predict Life Satisfaction of Spouses and Their Offspring. Journal of Happiness Studies. 21. 1–22. https://doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00108-8
Zietsch, B. P. – Verweij, K. J. H. – Heath, A. C. – Martin, N. G. (2011): Variation in human mate choice: Simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating. The American naturalist. 177(5), 605–616. https://doi:10.1086/659629
Copyright (c) 2022 Linda Koníková, Miroslav Králík, Ondřej Klíma, Martin Čuta