Gathering Digital Evidence in Cross-border Situations

Vol.27,No.1(2019)

Jozef Záhora

https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2019-1-3

PDF (Čeština)
Abstract
The borderless of the Internet, causes that electronic services can be provided from anywhere in the world and it is not necessarily required a presence of this person in a State where the services are offered. However, the Internet can also be misused as tools to commit or facilitate crimes, including serious crimes such as terrorist attacks. When that happens, the cyberspace is often the only place where investigators can find leads to determine who committed a crime and obtain evidence that can be used in court. They can be often the only evidence law which can be collected by enforcement authorities. Therefore, effective mechanisms to obtain digital evidence are of the essence also in cross-border situations. However, present-day solutions too often prove unsatisfactory, bringing investigations to a halt because lack of evidence. To make it easier and faster for law enforcement and judicial authorities to obtain the electronic evidence they need to investigate and eventually prosecute criminals and terrorists, the Commission proposed new rules which will create a European Production Order, create a European Preservation Order and oblige electronic service providers to designate a legal representative in the Union.

Keywords:
E-evidence; Electronic Evidence; Electronic Services; Production Order; Preservation Order.

Pages:
49–63
References

ABELOVSKÝ, T. Zaistenie elektronického dôkazu vo svetle rekodifikácie. In: Revue pro právo a technologie, 2015, č. 11, s. 29–48.

AKBAL, E. a S. DOGAN. Forensics Image Acquisition Process of Digital Evidence. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 2018, roč. 10, c. 5, s. 1–8. DOI https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2018.05.01">https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2018.05.01

ALLEN, J. a A. HALLENE. Digital Evidence. In: American Journal of Family Law, 2018, roč. 32, č. 1, Spring, s. 21–24.

CLOUGH, J. The Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime: Defining 'Crime' in a Digital World. In: Criminal Law Forum, 2012, roč. 23, č. 4, s. 363–391. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-012-9183-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-012-9183-3

HLAVÁČOVÁ, K. a O. CHORVÁT. Přístup orgánů činných v trestním řízení k datům uloženým v cloudu. In: Revue pro právo a technologie, 2016, roč. 7, č. 14, s. 3–24. Dostupné z: https://journals.muni.cz/revue/article/view/6120

CHAIKIN, D. Network investigations of cyber attacks: The limits of digital evidence. In: Crime, Law and Social Change, 2006, č 4–5, s. 239–256.

IVOR, J., L. KLIMEK a J. ZÁHORA. Trestné právo Európskej únie a jeho vplyv na právny poriadok Slovenskej republiky. Žilina: Eurokódex, 2013.

KLIMEK, L. Európske centrum boja proti počítačovej kriminalite. In: Justičná revue, 2015, roč. 67, č. 8–9, s. 1032–1043.

KLIMEK, L., J. ZÁHORA a K. HOLCR. Počítačová kriminalita v európskych súvislostiach. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.

RIJKEN, C. Re-balancing Security and Justice: Protection of Fundamental Rights in Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters. In: Common Market Law Review, 2010, roč. 47, č. 5.

SHAH, M. S. M. B., S. SALEEM a R. ZULQARNAIN. Protecting Digital Evidence Integrity and Preserving Chain of Custody. In: The Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, JDFSL, roč. 12, č. 2, s. 121–129.

ZÁHORA, J. Počítačová kriminalita v európskom kontexte. In: Justičná revue: časopis pre právnu prax, 2005, roč. 57, č. 2.

ZÁHORA, J. Spoločné vyšetrovanie trestných činov v Európskej únii. In: Karlovarská právní revue, 2010, roč. 6, č. 4.

ZÁHORA, J. Aktuálne trendy v postihu počítačovej kriminality v Slovenskej republike. In: Justičná revue: časopis pre právnu teóriu a prax, 2016, roč. 68, č. 3.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0

542

Views

328

PDF (Čeština) views

Copyright © 2019 Jozef Záhora

PDF (Čeština)