Publish or keep hidden: How readers of the tabloid Blesk discuss the public and private lives of politicians
Vol.16,No.1(2014)
Politicians as public persons are under increasing review by both the media and the general public. This review focuses not only on acts in public office, both official and unofficial, but also on the behavior of politicians in private life that could, in a real or imagined way, influence their performance in public office. This paper presents the perceptions of the boundaries between the public and private lives of politicians by readers of the most popular Czech tabloid, Blesk. The qualitative analysis based on in-depth interviews and a focus group with readers presents arguments that readers use to categorize information about politicians into that that belongs in the public domain and should be therefore published, and that that belongs to the private sphere and should not be published. In the readers’ views, citizens have the right to know about a politician’s private life, such as information that reflects a politician’s character and about possible influences from their private life on their performance in public office. The readers also consider how it feels for a politician to be a private person in public office under public scrutiny. These readers then often advocate the right of a politician to have his privacy respected, since these readers themselves would not be pleased to be under such a high level of public scrutiny regarding their own lives. It seems that the readers’ arguments are largely based on their personal history. We finally suggest that research on political participation would be enriched by including the perspective of everyday life experiences of the general public.
Celebritization; Perception of Politics; Public and Private; Tabloids
Martin Volek
Institute of Sociological Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University
Bailey, J. (2002): From Public to Private: The Development of the Concept of the ‚Private‘, Social Research, roč. LXIX, č. 1, s. 15-31.
Baum, M. A. (2002): Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public, The American Political Science Review, roč. XCVI, č. 1, s. 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004252
Baum, M. A. (2003): Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence? Political Communication, roč. XX, č. 2, s. 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211181
Blesk. (2010a): Topolánkova famílie v Toskánsku: Kde na to bere? 25. 6. 2010, online verze (http://www.blesk.cz/clanek/zpravy-politika/138179/topolankova-familie-v-toskansku-kde-na-to-bere.html), [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Blesk. (2010b): Vzal bývalý senátor úplatek? Korupce po letech u soudu, Blesk, 20. 7. 2010.
Blesk. (2010c): Paroubek: Ráno pláž, večer bazén… Exšéf ČSSD se vrátil z řecké pohádky do české ‚pastoušky‘, 5. 8. 2010, online verze (http://www.blesk.cz/clanek/zpravy-politika/140237/leto-podle-paroubka-rano-plaz-vecer-bazen.html), [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Blesk. (2010d): Nejhůře oblékaní turisté? Britové!, 7. 6. 2010, online verze (http://www.blesk.cz/clanek/radce-cestovani/137309/nejhure-oblekani-turiste-britove.html) , [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Blesk. (2011): Lidový Nečas: Typicky česká dovolená, tvrdí odborníci, 2. 8. 2011. Online verze (http://www.blesk.cz/clanek/zpravy-politika/157050/lidovy-necas-typicky-ceska-dovolena-tvrdi-odbornici.html), [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Bobbio, N. (1989): Democracy and Dictatorship. The Nature and Limits of State Power, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Boorstin, D. J. (1992): The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America, New York, Atheneum.
Brennan, G. – Hamlin, A. 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires, Oxford, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Corner, J. (2000): Mediated persona and political culture: Dimensions of structure and proces, European Journal of Cultural Studies, roč. III, č. 3, s. 386-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754940000300306
Černý, K. (2006): Sociologie a společnost: totalitární nástrahy, současné výzvy. Rozhovor s Miloslavem Petruskem. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, roč. XLII, č. 5, s. 1063-1075.
Davidson, W. P. (1983): The Third-Person Effect in Communication, Public Opinion Quarterly, roč. 47, č. 1, s. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
Davis, R. – Owen, D. M. (1998): New Media and American Politics, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Delli Carpini, M. X. (1996): Voters, Candidates, and Campaigns in the New Information Age: An Overview and Assessment, The International Journal of Press/Politics, roč. I, č. 4, s. 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X96001004005
Drake, P. – Higgins, M. (2006): I'm a celebrity, get me into politics: the political celebrity and the celebrity politician, in Holmes - Redmond. (eds.): Framing Celebrity: New Directions in Celebrity Culture, London, Routledge.
Farina, C. R. (2010): False Comfort and Impossible Promises: Uncertainty, Information Overload, and the Unitary Executive, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, roč. XII, č. 2, s. 357-424.
Frantová, V. (2013): Proč číst Blesk? Sociální teorie, 11. 11. 2013, online verze (http://socialniteorie.cz/proc-cist-blesk/).
Galtung, J. – Ruge, H. M. (1965): The Structure of Foreign News, Journal of Peace Research, roč. II, č. 1, s. 64-91.
Hall, S. (1999): Encoding, decoding, in: S. During (ed.): The Cultural Studies Reader, Routlege.
idnes.cz. (2011): Vondráčková podle soudu nemá nárok na omluvu. 7. 3. 2011, online verze (http://revue.idnes.cz/vondrackova-podle-soudu-nema-narok-na-omluvu-fnp-/lidicky.aspx?c=A110307_151227_lidicky_pad), [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Jenks, C. (1998, ed.): Core Sociological Dichotomies, London, Sage.
Jungová, E. (2006): Obraz veřejnosti v tisku na příkladu vládní krize: analýza MFDnes a Blesku, Praha, Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd UK.
Kabele, J. (2010): Heuristická strategie odborného studia společenských záležitostí, Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, roč. XLVI, č. 4, s. 593–618.
Kasl Kollmanová, D. (2012): Zveřejněné soukromí: utváření obrazu soukromého života politiků v médiích, Brno, Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury (CDK).
Kuhn, R. (2007): The Public and the Private in Contemporary French Politics, French Cultural Studies, roč. IIXX, č. 2, s. 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957155807077996
Kvale, S. (2002): Dialogue as Oppression and Interview Research, Nordic Educational Research Association Conference Tallinn, Estonia, 7-9. 3. 2002, online verze (http://psy.au.dk/fileadmin/Psykologi/Forskning/Kvalitativ_metodeudvikling/NB32/dialogueopptallinnNB.pdf), [cit. 10.9. 2013].
Langer, A. I. (2007): A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945 – 1999), Parliamentary Affairs, roč. LX, č. 3, s. 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm028
Langer, A. I. (2010): The Politization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect, The International Journal of Press/Politics, roč. XV, č. 1, s. 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209351003
Lee, A. M. – Delli Carpini, M. X. (2010): News Consumption Revisited: Examining the Power of Habits in the 21st Century, 11th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX, 23-24. 4. 2010, online verze (https://online.journalism.utexas.edu/2010/papers/LeeCarpini10.pdf), [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Lumby, C. (1999): Gotcha: Life in a Tabloid World, St Leonards, Allen & Unwin.
Macdonald, M. (2000): Rethinking Personalization in Current Affairs Journalism, in C. Sparks – J. Tulloch (eds.): Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards, New York, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield.
Marada, R. (2002): Masová média a proměny občanské veřejnosti. Revue pro média č. 3: Média a politika, s. 1-11.
Meyrowitz, J. (2006): Všude a nikde: vliv elektronických médií na sociální chování, Praha, Karolinum.
Novák, A. (2003): Soudní přezkum správních rozhodnutí před obecnými a správními soudy, online verze (http://www.epravo.cz/top/clanky/soudni-prezkum-spravnich-rozhodnuti-pred-obecnymi-a-spravnimi-soudy-21957.html) , [cit. 10. 9. 2013].
Postman, N. (2010): Ubavit se k smrti. Veřejná komunikace ve věku zábavy, Praha, Mladá fronta.
Prior, M. (2003): Any Good News in Soft News? The Impact of Soft News Preference on Political Knowledge, Political Communication, roč. XX, č. 2, s. 149-171.
Prokop, D. (2005): Boj o média. Dějiny nového kritického myšlení o médiích. Praha: Karolinum.
Roberts, B. (2002): Biographical Research, Buckingham, Open University Press.
Street, J. (2004): Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation, roč. IV, č. 4, s. 435-452.
Street, J. (2011): Mass Media, Politics, and Democracy, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thomas, D. R. (2006): A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data, American Journal of Evaluation, roč. XXVII, č. 2, s. 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Van Zoonen, L. (1998): A day at the Zoo: Political Communication, Pigs and Popular Culture, Media Culture Society, roč. XX, č. 2, s. 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344398020002002
Van Zoonen, L. (2005): Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Walsh, K. C. (2004): Talking about politics: informal groups and social identity in American life, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Weintraub, J. (1997): The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction, in: J. Weintraub. (ed.): Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Weiskel, C. T. (2005): From Sidesick to Sideshow – Celebrity, Entertainment, and the Politics of Distraction: Why Americans Are ‘Sleepwalking Toward the End of the Earth‘, American Behavioral Scientist, roč. XLIX, č. 3, s. 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205280203
West, D. M. – Orman, J. (2003): Celebrity Politics, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2014 Martin Volek