By Whom and Where the Czech Political Science Is Produced. A Personal-Institutional Analysis of Publications in Czech Reviewed Political Science Journals

Vol.11,No.2–3(2009)

Jan Holzer Roman Chytilek Pavel Pšeja Michal Šindelář

PDF (Čeština)
Abstract
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of studies and texts published in relevant Czech political science journals, while highlighting the institutional and personal background of the various published material. In this way, the authors strive to identify sets of variables that assist in constituting (self-)images of the Czech political science – namely, the relevance of various institutions in terms of the publication efforts of their members, topical preferences of top Czech political scientists providing a major part of the general publication output, and institutional and topical biases of relevant Czech political science journals. Given the results of this analysis, the authors are able to draw several tentative conclusions about the state of Czech political science in terms of the major characteristics and publication preferences of the Czech political science community, putting an emphasis on rational publication strategies of the researchers, stabilization of topical coverage of major political science institutions and the roles of top researchers in setting the agenda.

Keywords:
Content Analysis; Content Characterization; Czech Political Science; Czech Political Science Journals; Issues; Authors; Subdisciplines; Trends;
Author biographies

Jan Holzer

Předseda redakční rady Středoevropských politických studií, docent Katedry politologie Fakulty sociálních studií Masarykovy univerzity v Brně. Vědecký pracovník Institutu pro srovnávací politologický výzkum Fakulty sociálních studií Masarykovy univerzity.

Roman Chytilek

Odborný asistent, Fakulta sociálních studií Masarykovy univerzity v Brně.

Pavel Pšeja

Odborný asistent, Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií, Fakulta sociálních studií, Masarykova Univerzita, Brno.

Michal Šindelář

Student magisterského stupně oboru sociologie, Fakulta sociálních studií, Masarykova univerzita, Brno.
References

De Solla Price, D. J. (1970): Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology, and Nonscience, in: C. E. Nelson – D. K. Pollock (eds): Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, Lexington, MA, Heath Lexington Books, pp. 3-22.
Hicks, D. (2004): The Four Literatures of Social Science, in: H. Moed (ed.): Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Studies, Springer Netherlands, pp. 473-496.
Hix, S. (2004): A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments, Political Studies Review, Vol. II, No. 3, pp. 293-313.
Holzer, J. – Chytilek, R. – Pšeja, P. – Šindelář, M. (2009): Jaká se produkuje politická věda? Tematická analýza publikací v českých recenzovaných politologických časopisech, Politologický časopis, roč. XVI., č. 2, s. 91-115.
Holzer, J. – Pšeja, P. (2002): Political Science – Czech Republic, in: M. Kaase – V. Sparschuh (eds): Three Social Science Disciplines in Central and Eastern Europe. Handbook on Economics, Political Science and Sociology (1989–2001), Bonn/Berlin – Budapest, Social Science Information Centre – Collegium Budapest, pp. 226-245.
Holzer, J. – Pšeja, P. (2003): First Decade of Czech Political Science: Issues, Research, Methods, in: L. Cabada (ed.): Contemporary Questions of Central European Politics, Plzeň, ZČU, pp. 234-248.
Holzer, J. – Pšeja, P. (2007): Na cestě ke světlým zítřkům aneb česká politologie patnáct let po, Politologický časopis, Vol. XIV, No. 1, s. 61-70.
Sandström, U. (2007): A Metric for Academic Performance applied to Australian universities, 2001–2004, WCU-2, Shanghai.
Šindelář, M. (2008): Obraz české politologie na základě obsahové analýzy politologických periodik, bakalářská práce, Brno, FSS MU.

Metrics

389

Views

149

PDF (Čeština) views

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2009 Jan Holzer, Roman Chytilek, Pavel Pšeja, Michal Šindelář

PDF (Čeština)