Hledání typologie demokracií pro východní Evropu

Petr Dvořák


The paper deals with the limits of applicability of Lijphart’s typology of democracies vis-a-vis data from Central and Eastern Europe. Two alternative outlines of democratic typologies devised by Steffen Ganghof and André Kaiser are presented and an operationalization of their key dimensions is attempted. The typologies are then used for the determination of types of democracy in CEE. Finally, the typologies are evaluated on the basis of their results and avenues for further research in this domain are suggested.

Bibliografická citace

Dvořák, P. (2012). Hledání typologie demokracií pro východní Evropu. Středoevropské politické studie, 14(2–3), 272-314. Získáno z https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/4584

Klíčová slova

Democracy; Typology of Democracies; institutionalism; Eastern Europe;

Plný Text:



Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Umístění zdrojů na internetu ověřeno k 29. 10. 2010
Anckar, C. (1997): Determinants of Disproportionality and Wasted Votes, Electoral studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 501-515. Dostupné online v databázi Elsevier [linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261379497000383], ověřeno 8. 10. 2010
Armingeon, K. – Careja, R. (2007): Comparative Data Set for 28 Post-Communist Countries, 1989-2007, Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Dostupné online: [http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.html], ověřeno 29. 10. 2010
Barsh, R. L. (1993): Measuring Human Rights: Problems of Methodology and Purpose, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp. 87-121
Beck, T. et al. (2010): Database of Political Institutions 2009 (updated 2010), World Bank, Report Nr. wps2283, April 2010; original in: Beck, T. et al. (2001): New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions, World Bank Economic Review, 15:1 (September), pp. 165-176. Dostupné online: [http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRES/Resources/DPI2009.xls], ověřeno 29. 10. 2010
Birch, S. (2003): Political Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe, Basingstoke & New York, Palgrave Macmillan
Borman, N.-C. (2010): Patterns of Democracy and Its Critics, Living Reviews in Democracy, Vol. 2 (2010), Zurich, Center for Intertnational and Comparative Studies. Dostupné online [http://democracy.livingreviews.org/index.php/lrd/article/view/lrd-2010-3/26], ověřeno 27. 9. 2010
Collier, D. – Laporte, J. – Seawright, J. (2008): Typologies: Forming Concepts and Creating Categorical Variables, in: Box-Steffensmeier, J. M. – Brady, H. E. – Collier, D. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford, Oxford University Press
Coppedge, M. – Alvarez, A. – Maldonado, C. (2008): Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 70, No. 3, July 2008, pp. 632-647. Dostupné online v databázi Cambridge Journals [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1927232], ověřeno 6. 10. 2010
Cranenburgh, O. van – Kopecký, P. (2004): Political Institutions in New Democracies: (Not so) Hidden Majoritarianism in Post-apartheid South Africa, Acta Politica 39(3): 279-96
Croissant, A. – Schächter, T. (2009): Demokratiestrukturen in Asien – Befunde, Determinanten und Konsequenzen, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 19(3): 387-419
Dahl, R. (1971): Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Fortin, J. (2008): Patterns of Democracy? Counterevidence from Nineteen Post-Communist Countries, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2 (2008): 2, pp. 198-220. Dostupné online v databázi Springer Link [http://www.springerlink.com/content/m4366454558l7646], ověřeno 5. 10. 2010
Foweraker, J. – Krznaric, R. (2000): Measuring Liberal Democratic Performance: an Empirical and Conceptual Critique, Political Studies, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 759-787. Dostupné online v databázi Blackwell Synergy [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9248.00282], ověřeno 1. 11. 2010
Foweraker, J. – Landman, T. (2002): Constitutional Design and Democratic Performance, Democratization, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Summer 2002), pp. 43-66. Dostupné online v databázi Informaworld [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a714000250~frm=abslink], ověřeno 26. 9. 2010
Ganghof, S. (2005): Normative Modelle, institutionelle Typen und beobachtbare Verhaltenmuster: Ein Vorschlag zum Vergleich parlamentarischer Demokratien, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46 Jg. (2005), Heft 3, S. 406-431
Ganghof, S. (2010): Review Article: Democratic Inclusiveness: a Reinterpretation of Lijphart’s Patters of Democracy, British Journal of Political Science, 40 (2010), pp. 679-692. Dostupné online v databázi Cambridge Journals [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7834680], ověřeno 6. 10. 2010
Gerring, J. – Thacker, S. C. – Moreno, C. (2005): Centripetal Democratic Governance: a Theory and Global Inquiry, American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 567-581. Dostupné online [www.bu.edu/sthacker/apsr2005.pdf], ověřeno 26. 9. 2010
ISPO (2010): CODER, databáze volebních výsledků. Online zdroj [http://ispo.fss.muni.cz/coder-databaze-volebnich-vysledku], ověřeno 1. 11. 2010
Kaiser, A. – Lehnert, M. – Miller, B. – Sieberer, U. (2002a): The Democratic Quality of Institutional Regimes: a Conceptual Framework, Political Studies, Vol. 50 (2002), pp. 313-331. Dostupné online v databázi Wiley Online Library [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.t01-1-00372/full], ověřeno 26. 9. 2010
Kaiser, A. (2002b): Alternation, Inclusion and the European Union, European Union Politics, Vol. 3 (4), pp. 445-458, dostupné online v databázi SAGE [http://eup.sagepub.com/content/3/4/445.short], ověřeno 20. 9. 2010
Lehnert, M. (2007): Typologies in Social Inquiry, in: Gschwend, T. – Schimmelfennig, F. (Eds.): Research Design in Political Science – How to Practice What They Preach, New York, Palgrave MacMillan
Lijphart, A. (1977): Democracy in plural societies: a comparative exploration, New Haven, Yale University Press
Lijphart, A. (1984): Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries, New Haven, Yale University Press
Lijphart, A. (1991): Constitutional Choices for New Democracies, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Winter 1991), pp. 72-84. Dostupné online v databázi MUSE [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jod/summary/v002/2.1lijphart.html], ověřeno 6. 10. 2010
Lijphart, A. (1999): Patterns of democracy. Ggovernment Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, Yale, Yale University Press
Mainwaring, S. (2001): Two Models of Democracy, in: Journal of Democracy 12, pp. 170–175
Nagel, J. H. (2000): Expanding the Spectrum of Democracies: Reflection on Proportional Representation in New Zealand, in: Crepaz et al. (eds.): Democracy and Institutions. The Life Work of Arend Lijphart, Michigan, The University of Michigan Press
Roberts, A. (2006): What Type of Democracy is Emerging in Eastern Europe?, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 37-64. Dostupné online [http://bellwether.metapress.com/content/rhh327j02v64930w], ověřeno 7. 10. 2010
Říchová, B. (2006): Přehled moderních politologických teorií. Empiricko-analytický přístup v soudobé politické vědě, Praha, Portál
Siaroff, A. (1999): Corporatism in Twenty-four Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement, European Journal of Political Research, 36, pp. 175–205
Spörer, D. (2004): Ausmaß, Strukturen und Implikationen präsidialer Macht im postkommunistischen Raum, Swiss Political Science Review, 10(2), pp. 157-179. Dostupné online v databázi Ingenta Connect: [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/spsa/spsr/2004/00000010/00000002/art00008], ověřeno 4. 11. 2010
Stoiber, M. – Abromeit, H. (2006): a New Measurement of Democracy: The Inclusion of the Context, paper, Chicago, Midwest Political Science Association. Dostupné online [http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/8/3/0/3/p83037_index.html], ověřeno 26. 9. 2010
Strøm, K. (1990): Minority Government and Majority Rule, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Taagepera, R. (2000): Arend Lijphart and Dimensions of Democracy, in: Crepaz, M. L. – Koelble, T. A. – Wilsford, D. (Eds.): Democracy and Institutions: The Life and Work of Arend Lijphart, Michigan, University of Michigan Press
Taagepera, R. (2002): Implications of the Effective Number of Parties for Cabinet Formation, Party Politics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 227-236. Dostupné online v databázi SAGE [http://ppq.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/227], ověřeno 8. 5. 2010
Taagepera, R. (2003): Arend Lijphart’s dimensions of democracy: logical connections and institutional design, Political Studies 51(1): 1–19
Ústava Albánské republiky, dostupné online: [http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/al00000_.html]
Ústava České republiky, dostupné online: [http://www.psp.cz/docs/laws/constitution.html]
Ústava Republiky Bosna a Hercegovina, dostupné online: [http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/bk00000_.html]
Ústava Republiky Černá Hora (verze 1992), dostupné online: [http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2005/CDL%282005%29096-e.pdf]
Ústava Republiky Černá Hora (verze 2007), dostupné online: [http://www.comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/files/Montenegro_2007.pdf]
Ústava Republiky Srbsko (verze 1990), dostupné online: [http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/untc/unpan019071.pdf]
Ústava Republiky Srbsko (verze 2006), dostupné online: [http://www.srbija.gov.rs/cinjenice_o_srbiji/ustav.php?change_lang=en]
Vatter, A. (2009): Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries?, European Political Science Review, 1 (2009): 1, pp. 125-154. Dostupné online v databázi Cambridge Journals [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?aid=4910828], ověřeno 20. 9. 2010

Copyright (c) 2012 Petr Dvořák

Creative Commons License
Tato práce je licencována pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.