Senátní volby 2010 a voličské přesuny mezi prvním a druhým kolem
Roč.13,č.2–3(2011)
Bayesian ecological inference; Czech politics; Senatorial election;
Kamil Gregor
Michal Pink
Allport, Floyd H. (1924): The Group Fallacy in Relation to Social Science, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. XXIX, No. 6, pp. 688-703.
Čermák, Daniel (2010): Ekologická inference a ekologické zkreslení, Socioweb, roč. VIII, č. 2, on-line text <http://www.socioweb.cz/index.php?disp=teorie&shw=427&lst=117>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Volební server Českého statistického úřadu, on-line zdroj <http://www.volby.cz/>. [cit. 01. 08. 2011]
Deming, Edwards W. – Stephan, Frederick F. (1940): On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When Expected Marginal Totals Are Known, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. XI, No. 4, pp. 427-444.
Duncan, Otis D. – Davis, Baverly (1953): An Alternative to Ecological Correlation, American Sociological Review, Vol. XVIII, No. 6, pp. 665-666.
Elff, Martin – Gschwend, Thomas – Jonhston, Ron J. (2008): Ignoramus, Ignorabimus? On Uncertainty in Ecological Inference, Political Analysis, Vol. XVI, No. 1, pp. 70-92.
Ferree, Karen (1999): Iterative Approaches to R x C Ecological Inference Problems: Where They Can Go Wrong, Working paper, on-line text <http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/ferre99.pdf>. [cit. 2001-05-08]
Freedman, David A. – Ostland, Michael – Roberts, Michael R. – Klein, Stephen P. (1999): Response to King’s Comment, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. XCIV, No. 440, pp. 355-357.
Gehlke, C. E. – Biehl, Katherine (1934): Certain Effects of Grouping upon Size of the Correlation Coefficient in Census Tract Material, Journal of the American Statistical Association Supplement, Vol. XXIX, No. 185, pp. 663-664.
Gelman, Andrew – Park, David K. – Ansolabehere, Stephen – Price, Phillip N. – Minnite, Lorraine C. (2001): Models, Assumptions and Model Checking in Ecological Regressions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. CLXIV, No. 1, pp. 101-108.
Goodman, Leo (1953): Ecological Regressions and the Behavior of Individuals, American Sociological Review, Vol. XVIII, No. 6, pp. 663-666.
Goodman, Leo (1959): Some Alternatives to Ecological Correlation, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. LXIV, No. 6, pp. 610-624.
Glynn, Adam – Wakefield, Jon (2009): Ecological Inference in the Social Science, Statistical Methodology, Vol. VII, No. 3, pp. 307-322.
Graunt, John (1662): Natural And Political Observations Mentioned in a Following Index, And Made upon the Bills of Morality, London, John Martyn and James Allestry; cit. in: King, Gary (1997): A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 4.
Herron, Michael C. – Sekhon, Jasjeet S. (2005): Black Candidates And Black Voters: Assessing the Impact of Candidate Race on Uncounted Vote Rates, The Journal of Politics, Vol. LXVII, No. 1, pp. 154-177.
Cho, Wendy T. (1998): If the Assumption Fits: A Comment on the King Ecological Inference Solution, Political Analysis, Vol. VII, pp. 143-163.
Cho, Wendy T. – Gaines, Brian J. (2004): The Limits of Ecological Inference: The Case of Split-ticket Voting, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. XLVIII, No. 1, pp. 152-171.
Chytilek, Roman (2005a): České senátní volby. Podněty, výsledky, alternativy, in: Břetislav Dančák – Petr Fiala – Vlastimil Havlík (eds.): Evropeizace: Nové téma politologického výzkumu, Brno, Mezinárodní politologický ústav Masarykovy univerzity, s. 105-115.
Chytilek, Roman (2005b): Volby 2004 a strategické účinky volebních systémů, Středoevropské politické studie, roč. VI, č. 1, s. 13-25.
Chytilek, Roman – Šedo, Jakub – Lebeda, Tomáš – Čaloud, Dalibor (2009): Volební systémy, Praha, Portál.
Chytilek, Roman – Eibl, Otto (2011): České politické strany v politickém prostoru, Sociologický časopis, roč. XLVII, č. 1, s. 61-88.
Imai, Kosuke – King, Gary – Lau, Olivia (2007): Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software, on-line source <http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Johnston, Ron – Gschwend, Thomas – Pattie, Charles (2004): On Estimates of Split-ticket Voting: EI And Emax, Working paper, on-line text <http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/jgp04.pdf>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
King, Gary (1997): A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
King, Gary – Rosen, Ori – Tanner, Martin A. (1999): Binomial-Beta Hierarchical Models for Ecological Inference, Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. XXVIII, No. 1, pp. 61-90.
King, Gary – Tanner, Martin A. – Rosen, Ori (2004, eds.): Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies, Cambridge, The University of Cambridge.
King, Gary – Rosen, Ori – Tanner, Martin A. – Wagner, Alexander (2008): Ordinary Economic Voting Behavior in the Extraordinary Election of Adolf Hitler, Journal of Economic History, Vol. LXVIII, No. 4, pp. 951-956.
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2003): Who Voted Communist? Reconsidering the Social Bases of Radicalism in Interwar Poland, Slavic Review, Vol. LXII, No. 1, pp. 87-109.
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2004): Ethnic Diversity, Democracy, and Electoral Extremism: Lessons from Interwar Poland and Czechoslovakia, Working paper, on-line text <http://politics.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/4734/wittenberg_s05.pdf>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2009): Does Familiarity Breed Contempt? Inter-ethnic Contact And Support for Illiberal Parties, The Journal of Politics, Vol. LXXI, No. 2, pp. 414-428.
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2010a): Beyond Dictatorship And Democracy: Rethinking National Minority Inclusion and Regime Type in Interwar Eastern Europe, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. XLIII, No. 8-9, pp. 1089-1118.
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2010b): Deadly Communities: Local Political Milieus And the Persecution of Jews in Occupied Poland, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. XLIV, No. 3, pp. 259-283.
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2011a): Between State Loyalty and National Identity. Electoral Behaviour in Inter-war Poland, Working paper, on-line text <http://witty.berkeley.edu/Proofs%20Polin%2024.pdf>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Kopstein, Jeffrey S. – Wittenberg, Jason (2011b): Did Ethnic Balance Matter? Elections in Interwar Poland, Working paper, on-line text <http://individual.utoronto.ca/kopstein/journals/Between_Nationalization_and_Internationalization.pdf>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Lau, Olivia – Moore, Ryan. T. – Kellermann, Michael (2007): EiPack: R x C Ecological Inference And Higher-dimension Data Management, R News, Vol. VII, No. 2, pp. 43-47.
Lebeda, Tomáš – Vlachová, Klára – Řeháková, Blanka (2009): První volby do Senátu: analýza voleb do Senátu Parlamentu České republiky v roce 1996, Praha, Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.
Leemann, Lucas – Leimgruber, Philipp (2009): Ecological Inference and 113 Votes, Conference Swiss Political Science Association, St. Gallen.
Lumpa Janáčkovou volit nebudeme, odmítá ostravská ODS Nečasovu výzvu, 2010, iDNES, on-line text <http://zpravy.idnes.cz/>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Lyons, Pat (2008): Ekologické usuzování: Explorace metody latentní struktury za využití volebních dat z ČR, Data a výzkum – SDA Info, roč. 2, č. 1, s. 49-75.
Malcová, Karolína (2010): Analýza senátních voleb pohledem mikroúrovně vybraných obvodů neúspěšných pro ODS, Politologická revue, roč. V, č. 2, s. 77-101.
Malíř, Jiří – Marek, Pavel (2005, eds.): Politické strany II. 1938–2004, Brno, Doplněk.
Matějů, Petr – Vlachová Klára (1997): Volby do Senátu. Voliči, strany, osobnosti a ideologie, Parlamentní zpravodaj, č. 4-5; cit. in: Tomáš Lebeda – Klára Vlachová – Blanka Řeháková (2009): První volby do Senátu: analýza voleb do Senátu Parlamentu České republiky v roce 1996, Praha, Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky, s. 12.
Navrátil, Vojtěch (2010): Výsledky druhého kola senátních voleb 1996–2008: Kdo, proti komu, odkud a jak, Středoevropské politické studie, roč. VII, č. 1.
O’Loughlin, John (2002): The Electoral Geography of Weimar Germany: Exploratory Spatial Data Analyses (ESDA) of Protestant Support for the Nazi Party, Political Analysis, Vol. X, No. 3, pp. 217-243.
Ogburn, William – Goltra, Inez (1919): How Women Vote: A Study of an Election in Portland, Oregon, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. XXXIV, No. 3, pp. 413-433.
Park, Won-ho (2004): Estimation of Voter Transition Rates and Ecological Inference, Conference Western Political Science Association, Portland, Oregon.
Park, Won-ho (2008): Ecological Inference and Aggregate Analysis of Elections, Dissertation Thesis, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.
Petty, William (1690): Political Arithmetic, London, Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock; cit. in: Gary King (1997): A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 4.
Petty, William (1691): The Political Anatomy of Ireland, London, D. Brown and W. Rogers; cit. in: Gary King (1997): A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 4.
Robinson, William (1950): Ecological Correlation And the Behavior of Individuals, American Sociological Review, Vol. XV, No. 3, pp. 351-357; cit. in: Pat Lyons (2008): Ekologické usuzování: Explorace metody latentní struktury za využití volebních dat z ČR, Data a výzkum – SDA Info, roč. II, č. 1, s. 50.
Rosen, Ori – Jiang, Wenxin – King, Gary – Tanner, Martin A. (2001): Bayesian And Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: The R x C Case, Statistica Neerlandica, Vol. LV, No. 2, pp. 134-156.
Schuessler, Alexander A. (1999): Ecological Inference, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Vol. No. 96, pp. 10578-10581.
Senátorka prý chtěla na Romy použít dynamit, 2007, iDNES, on-line text <http://zpravy.idnes.cz/>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Mattos, de Silva – Veiga, Álvaro (2002): The Binomial-beta Hierarchical Model for Ecological Inference: Methodological Issues and Fast Implementation via the ECM Algorithm, Working paper, on-line text <http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/matto01.pdf>. [cit. 06. 05. 2011]
Simpson, Edward H. (1951): The Interpretation of Interactions in Contingency Tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. XIII, pp. 238-241; cit. in: Adam Glynn – Jon Wakefield (2009): Ecological Inference in the Social Sciences, Statistical Methodology, Vol. VII, No. 3, p. 310.
Throndike, E. L. (1939): On the Fallacy of Impution the Correlations Found for Groups to the Individuals or Smaller Groups Composing Them, American Journal of Psychology, Vol. LII, pp. 122-124.
Tomz, Michael – Tucker, Joshua A. – Wittenberg, Jason (2002): An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data, Political Analysis, Vol. X, No. 1, pp. 66-83.
Wakefield, Jon (2008): Ecologic Studies Revisited, Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. XXIX, No. 1, pp. 75-90.
Yule, G. Undy – Kendall, Maurice (1950): An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics; cit. in: Gary King (1997): A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 4.

Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2011 Kamil Gregor, Michal Pink