Podmínky demokratizace v de facto státech: případová studie Abcházie

Tomáš Hoch, Vladimír Baar, Vincenc Kopeček

Abstrakt

De-facto states constitute an interesting anomaly in the international system of sovereign states. No matter how long their control of claimed territory has lasted or how effective their capacities to provide governmental services to its population are, they fail to achieve international recognition. A change in the legitimising strategy adopted by the leaders of de-facto states came with the recognition of Kosovo’s independence by most western powers. In the past, their claims to independence were based primarily on the right to national self-determination, historical continuity and claim to a remedial right to secession, based on alleged human-rights violations. Increasingly, though, these arguments have been supplemented by an emphasis on “democratisation-for-recognition-strategy”. According to this strategy, those states that proved their viability as democratic states should earn their sovereignty. The aim of this article is to demonstrate this strategy on an instrumental case study of Abkhazia. As a result of the study of secondary literature on the topic of de-facto states democratization, supported with field research in Abkhazia, we try to identify those factors which are promoting and on the other hand obstructing a democratization process in such a de-facto state.

Bibliografická citace

Hoch, T., Baar, V., & Kopeček, V. (2010). Podmínky demokratizace v de facto státech: případová studie Abcházie. Středoevropské politické studie, 12(4), 285-300. Získáno z https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/4511

Klíčová slova

Abkhazia; De facto states; Democratization; Sovereignty;

Plný Text:

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

AbkhazWorld (2010): MFA of Abkhazia: The USA Use Double Standards Policy, Ignore Historic Facts and Justify Georgia’s Aggressive Policy, AbkhazWorld, 31. 03. 2010, on-line text . [cit. 17. 06. 2010]
Broers, L. (2005): The Politics of Non-recognition and Democratisation, in: L. Broers (ed.): The Limits of Leadership: Elites and Societies in the Nagorny Karabakh Peace Process, London, Conciliation Resources.
Caspersen, N. (2008): Separatism and the Democracy in the Caucasus, Survival, Vol. L, No. 4, pp. 113-136.
Caspersen, N. (2009): Playing the Recognition Game: External Actors and De Facto States, The International Spectator, Vol. XLIV, No. 4, pp. 47-60.
Collier, D. – Levitsky, S. (1997): Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research, World Politics, Vol. IL, No. 3, pp. 430-451.
Collier, P. – Hoeffler, A. (2002): Greed and Grievance in Civil War, The Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper Series, Paper No. 160.
Crawford, J. (2006): The Creation of State in International Law, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
EU Delegation to Georgia (2010): Overview of EC Assistance to People Affected by Conflict in GEORGIA, on-line text . [cit. 10. 06. 2010]
Freedom House (2009): Freedom in the World Comparative and Historical Data, Freedom House, on-line zdroj . [cit. 17. 06. 2010]
Glassner, M. I. – De Blij, H. J. (1988): Systematic Political Geography, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Goldstein, J. S. (2003): International Relations, New York, Longman.
Hocking, B. – Smith, M. (1995): World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, London, Longman.
International Crisis Group (2010a): Abkhazia: Deepening Dependence, Europe Report No. 202.
International Crisis Group (2010b): South Ossetia: The Burden of Recognition, Europe Report No. 205, on-line text . [cit. 25. 06. 2010]
Jackson, R. H. (1993): Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
King, C. (2001): The Benefits of Ethnic War: Understanding Eurasia’s Unrecognized States, World Politics, Vol. LIII, No.4, pp. 524-552.
Kolossov, M. – O’Loughlin, J. (1998): Pseudo-states as Harbingers of a Post-modern Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic, in: D. Newman (ed.): Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, London, Frank Cass, pp. 151-176.
Kolstø, P. (2006): The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. XLIII, No. 6, pp. 723-740.
Lynch, D. (2004): Engaging Eurasia’s Separatist States, Washington DC, United States Institute of Peace.
Merkel, W. (2004): Embedded and Defective Democracies, Democratization, Vol. XI, No. 5, pp. 33-58.
Mikhelidze, N. – Pirozzi, N. (2008): Civil Society and Conflict Transformation in Abkhazia, Israel-Palestine, Nagorno-Karabakh, Transnistria and Western Sahara, Brighton, MICROCON.
Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, on-line text . [cit. 05. 05. 2010]
Pegg, S. (1998): International Society and the De Facto State, Aldershot, Ashgate.
Popescu, N. (2006): Democracy in Secessionism: Transnistria and Abkhazia’s Domestic Policies, Budapest, Center for Policy Studies.
Popescu, N. (2007): Europe’s Unrecognised Neighbours: The EU in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, CEPS Working Document, No. 260, on-line text . [cit. 15. 05. 2010]
Pridnestrovie.net (2010): Ten Things You Didn’t Know about Europe’s Newest Country, Pridnestrovie.net, on-line text . [cit. 28. 06. 2010]
Riegl, M. (2010): Terminologie kvazistátů, Acta Politologica, roč. II, č. 1, s. 57-71.
Rotberg, R. (2003): State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror, Cambridge, World Peace Foundation.
Šmíd, T. – Vaďura, V. (2009): Teoretické vymezení a konceptualizace fenoménu slabých a selhávajících států, Mezinárodní vztahy, roč. XLIV, č. 2, s. 44-64.
Smooha, S. (1997): Ethnic Democracy: Israel as an Archetype, Israel Studies, Vol. II, No. 2, pp. 198-241.
Sørensen, G. (2005): Stát a mezinárodní vztahy, Praha, Portál.
Waisová, Š. a kol. (2007): Slabé státy. Selhání, rozpad a obnova státnosti, Plzeň, Aleš Čeněk.
Way, L. (2003): Weak States and Pluralism: The Case of Moldova, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. XVII, No. 3, pp. 454-482.



Copyright (c) 2010 Tomáš Hoch, Vladimír Baar, Vincenc Kopeček

Creative Commons License
Tato práce je licencována pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.