Diskursivní rovina sporu o volební reformu v Rumunsku v roce 2012

Ivan Jarabinský


This article deals with the argumentation between opponents and advocates of the electoral reform which was approved by the Romanian parliament in May 2012. The text discusses the validity of the arguments raised by both sides of the dispute. For this purpose, the text considers only parliamentary debates and the argumentation of the Constitutional Court. The author employs arguments from the fields of political science and law to discuss the three main areas of the dispute. These are the representativeness of the intended electoral system, the number of elected representatives, and the timing of the electoral reform. The analysis concludes that the arguments to support each of the two main forms of electoral system – majoritarian and proportional – were used correctly. However, the arguments in favour of each system sometimes omitted important disadvantages connected with that system. Although the Constitution of Romania allows wide-ranging changes to the electoral system, the omitted consequences have to be taken into consideration. The text supplements discussions on electoral engineering with a focus on the constitutionality and validity of the arguments raised during the debate. From this perspective, it is necessary to take into consideration not just the mechanical effects of the electoral system but also its possible broader impact.

Bibliografická citace

Jarabinský, I. (2014). Diskursivní rovina sporu o volební reformu v Rumunsku v roce 2012. Středoevropské politické studie, 16(1), 29–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2014.1.29

Klíčová slova

Electoral System; Romania; Electoral Reform; First-Past-the-Post; Argumentation

Plný Text:



Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Benoit, K. (2004): Models of electoral system change, Electoral Studies, Vol. 23, Issue 3, 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00020-9

Biroul Electoral Central. (2007): www.becreferendum2007vu.ro. (http://www.becreferendum2007vu.ro/documente/rezultatefinale0001.pdf), [cit. 29. 6. 2013].

Biroul Electoral Central. (2008): www.becparlamentare2008.ro. (http://www.becparlamentare2008.ro/rezultate.html), [cit. 6. 6. 2013].

Biroul Electoral Central. (2009): http://www.bec2009p.ro. (http://www.bec2009p.ro/rezultate-Turul%20I.html), [cit. 21. 6. 2013].

Biroul Electoral Central. (2012a): www.beclocale2012.ro. (http://www.beclocale2012.ro/legislatie%20alegeri%20locale/electorala/Legea%20129-2011.pdf), [cit. 13. 6. 2013].

Biroul Electoral Central. (2012b): www.beclocale2012.ro. (http://www.beclocale2012.ro/DOCUMENTE%20BEC/REZULTATE%20FINALE/10%20Iunie%2024%20Iunie/PDF/Primari/P_vve_mandate_part_loc.pdf), [cit. 13. 6. 2013].

Biroul Electoral Central. (2012c): www.becparlamentare2012.ro. (http://www.becparlamentare2012.ro/rezultate.html), [cit. 14. 6. 2013].

Boix, C. (1999): Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies, American Political Science Review, Vol. 93, No 3, 609–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585577

Camera Deputaţilor. (2012a): www.cdep.ro. (http://www.cdep.ro/pls/proiecte/upl_pck.proiect?idp=12698), [cit. 2. 5. 2013].

Camera Deputaţilor. (2012b): www.cdep.ro. (http://www.cdep.ro/pls/steno/steno.stenograma?ids=7128&idm=19), [cit. 5. 6. 2013].

Constituţia României. (http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?id=339), [cit. 5. 6. 2013].

Curtea Constituţională a României. (2010): Decizia Nr. 61 din 14 ianuarie 2010. (, [cit. 28. 6. 2013].

Curtea Constituţională a României. (2012): Decizia Nr. 682 din 27 iunie 2012. (http://www.ccr.ro/files/products/D0682_12.pdf), [cit. 7. 6. 2013].

Freedom House. (2012): Romania. (http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2012/romania#_edn8), [cit. 1. 7. 2013].

Gherghina, S. – Stefan, L. – Chiru, M. (2013): Electoral Reform - Cui Bono? Attitudes of Romanian MPs to the Electoral System Change, The Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol 19, Issue 3, 351–369.

Chytilek, R. et al. (2009): Volební systémy, Praha, Portál.

Institutul Naţional de Statistică. (2002): http://www.insse.ro. (http://www.insse.ro/cms/files/RPL2002INS/vol1/tabele/t40.pdf), [cit. 13. 6. 2013].

Jarabinský, I. (2013): Volební podvody: Případová studie ruských parlamentních voleb 2011, Brno, Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií, Katedra politologie, Diplomová práce.

Legea nr. 35/2008. (http://www.roaep.ro/ro/section.php?id=93), [cit. 23. 5. 2013].

Lijphart, A. (1994): Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945–1990, New York, Oxford University Press.

Lijphart, A. (2007): Thinking About Democracy: Power sparing and majority rule in theory and practice, New York, NY, Routledge.

Mediafax.ro. (2012): UNPR a format cu PSD Alianţa de Centru Stânga, parte a USL. (http://www.mediafax.ro/politic/unpr-a-format-cu-psd-alianta-de-centru-stanga-parte-a-usl-10004650), [cit. 2. 7. 2013].

Neamtu, S.-I. (2011): The Effects of the Electoral Reform on Members of the Romanian Parliament: A Network Analysis, Budapest, Central European University, Department of Political Science, MA Thesis. (www.etd.ceu.hu/2011/neamtu_silvia-ioana.pdf), [cit. 1. 7. 2013].

Norris, P. (2012): Are there global norms and universal standards of electoral integrity and malpractice? Comparing public and expert perceptions, HKS Working Paper No. RWP12-010. (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2087611), [cit. 31. 6. 2013].

Ogaru, R.-M. (2011): The Effects of the 2008 Romanian Electoral System Reform: when the Reformation Converts to Counter- Reformation, Centre for Legislative Studies, University of Hull, PhD Legislative Studies Conference, 22nd July 2011. (http://www2.hull.ac.uk/fass/PDF/Ogaru_The%20Effects%20of%20the%202008%20Romanian%20Electoral%20System%20Reform.pdf), [cit. 1. 7. 2013].

PL-x nr. 131/2012. L E G E privind modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 35/2008 pentru alegerea Camerei Deputaţilor şi a Senatului şi pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 67/2004 pentru alegerea autorităţilor administraţiei publice locale, a Legii administraţiei publice locale nr. 215/2001 şi a Legii nr. 393/2004 privind Statutul aleşilor locali. Ve znění přijatém Poslaneckou sněmovnou. (http://www.cdep.ro/pls/proiecte/docs/2012/cd131_12.pdf), [24. 5. 2013].

Ponta, V. – Antonescu, C. (2012): Expunere de Motive. (http://www.cdep.ro/pls/proiecte/upl_pck.proiect?idp=12698), [20. 4. 2013].

Recensământul Populaţiei şi al Locuinţelor. (2011): Rezultate. (http://www.recensamantromania.ro/rezultate-2/), [cit. 14. 6. 2013].

Reynolds, A. – Reilly, B. – Ellis, A. (2005): Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook, Stockholm, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (http://www.idea.int/publications/esd/upload/ESD_Handb_low.pdf), [cit. 1. 7. 2013].

România TV. (2012): www.rtv.net. (http://www.rtv.net/tag/sondaj-csci_37804), [cit. 1. 7. 2013].

Romanian Government Department for Interethnic Relations. (2010): www.dri.gov.ro. (http://www.dri.gov.ro/index.html?page=council_minorities), [19. 6. 2013].

Shugart, M.S. (2008): Inherent and Contingent Factors in Reform Initiation in Plurality Systems. In. Blais, A. (ed.): To Keep or To Change First Past the Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform, New York, Oxford University Press, s. 7–60.

Šedo, J. (2007): Volební systémy postkomunistických zemí, Brno, Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury (CDK).

Taagepera, R. – Shugart, M. S. (1989): Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems, New Heawen & London, Yale University Press.

Taagepera, R. (2007): Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems, New York, Oxford University Press.

Venice Commission. (2002): Code of good practice in electoral matters: Guidelines and explanatory report. Adopted by Venice Commission at its 52nd session, Venice, 18 – 19, October 2002. (http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2002)023rev.aspx) [cit. 28. 6. 2013].


Copyright (c) 2014 Ivan Jarabinský

Creative Commons License
Tato práce je licencována pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.