Ainsworthem, S. H. (2002): Analyzing Interest Groups: Group Influence on People and Policies, New York, W. W. Norton.
Armingeon, K. (1997): Swiss Corporatism in Comparative Perspective, West European Politics, Vol. XX, No. 4, pp. 164-179.
Balme, R. – Chabanet, D. (2008): European Governance and Democracy: Power and Protest in the EU, Lenham, Md., Rawman & Littlefield.
Bluhm, W. T. (1965): Theories of the Political System: Classics of Political Thought and Modern Political Analysis, London, Prentice-Hall.
Brand, S. – Ryan, S. M. – Nahra, M. H. (1993): Disclosing Lobbying Activities, Administrative Law Review, Vol. XLV, No. 4, pp. 343-365.
Brokl, L. (1997): Reprezentace zájmů v politickém systému České republiky, Praha, Sociologické nakladatelství.
Cawson, A. (1986): Corporatism and Political Theory, New York, Oxford, B. Blackwell.
Compston, H. (2003): Beyond Corporatism: A Configurational Theory of Policy Concentration, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. XLII, No. 6, pp. 787-809.
Crepaz, M. M. L. (1995): An Institutional Dinosaur: Austrian Corporatism in the Post-Industrial Age, West European Politics, Vol. XVIII, No. 4, pp. 64-88.
Dahl, R. (1961): Who Governs?, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (2002): Deliberative Democracy and Beyond; Liberals, Critics, Contestations, USA, Oxford University Press.
Fiala, P. – Mareš, M. (2003): Pluralismus a (neo)korporativismus, in: V. Hloušek – L. Kopeček (eds.): Demokracie: teorie, modely, osobnosti, podmínky, nepřátelé a perspektivy demokracie, Brno, Mezinárodní politologický ústav, s. 232-250.
Graziano, L. (2002): Lobbying, Pluralism, and Democracy, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. CXVII, No. 4, pp. 682-683.
Heinisch, R. (2000): Coping with Economic Integration: Corporatist Strategies in Germany and Austria in the 1990s, West European Politics, Vol. XXIII, No. 3, pp. 67-96.
Jones, E. (1999): Is ‘Competitive’ Corporatism an Adequate Response to Globalization? Evidence from the Low Countries, West European Politics, Vol. XXII, No. 3, pp. 159-181.
Kenworthy, L. (2000): Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism: A Survey and Assessment, Discussion Paper 00/4, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, on-line text . [cit. 12. 12. 2009]
Kernell, S. – Jacobson, G. C. (2000): The Logic of American Politics, Washington, CQ Press.
Key, V. O., Jr. (1964): Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed., New York, Crowell.
Kittel, B. (1996): Sozialpartnerschaft und Disorganisierung: Veränderung und Kontinuität der Entscheidungs-strukturen in der österreichischen Arbeitszeitpolitik, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Vol. II, No. 4, pp. 223-246.
Kittel, B. (2000): Deaustrification? The Policy-Area-Specific Evolution of Austrian Social Partnership, West European Politics, Vol. XXIII, No. 1, pp. 108-129.
Lehmbruch, G. (1979): Liberal Corporatism and Party Government, in: P. C. Schmitter – G. Lehmbruch (eds): Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation, Beverly Hills/London, Sage, pp. 147-184.
Marshall, M. (1996): The Changing Face of Swedish Corporatism: The Disintegration of Consensus, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXX, No. 3, pp. 843-858.
Meidner, R. (1993): Why Did the Swedish Model Fail?, in: R. Miliband – L. Panitch (eds): The Socialist Register 1993, London, Merlin Press, pp. 211-228.
Olson, M. (1971): The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Pelinka, A. (1999): The (In)Compatibility of Corporatism and Federalism: Austrian Social Partnership and the EU, West European Politics, Vol. XXII, No. 2, Special Issue on Compounded Representation in West European Federations, Joanne B. Brzinski (ed.), pp. 116-129.
Pontusson, J. (1998): Corporatism Versus Social Democracy: Divergent Fortunes of the Austrian and Swedish Labor Movements, West European Politics, Vol. XXI, No. 2, pp. 1-31.
Říchová, B. (2000): Přehled moderních politologických teorií: Empiricko-analytický přístup v současné politické vědě, Praha, Portál.
Rokkan, S. (1966): Norway: Numerical Democracy and Corporate Pluralism, in: R. Dahl (ed.): Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Salisbury, R. H. (1990): The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington – More Groups, Less Clout, in: A. King (ed.): American Political System, Washington, AEI Press.
Schmitter, P. C. – Grote, J. R. (1997): The Corporatist Sisyphus: Past, Present and Future, EUI Working Paper, SPS No. 97/4, Brussels, EU.
Schmitter. P. C. (1974): Still the Century of Corporatism?, in: P. C. Schmitter (ed.): Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, Beverly Hills, SAGE.
Schubert, K. (1995): Pluralismus versus korporativismus?, Politologický časopis, roč. II, č. 3, s. 175-191.
Siaroff. A. (1999): Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. XXXVI, No. 2, pp. 175-205.
Traxler, F. (2004): The Metamorphoses of Corporatism: From Classical to Lean Patterns, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. XLIII, No. 4, pp. 471-598.
Truman, D. B. (1951): The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Wilson, F. L. (1987): Interest-Group Politics in France, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wright, C. (1996): Response to Commentators’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Re-Search, Vol. LVI, No. 4, pp. 911-941.