Produkce domorodých znalostí a neoliberální univerzita v Brazílii
Roč.16,č.1(2025)
Anthropologia integra
Neoliberální univerzita se v 21. století silně etablovala na brazilských univerzitách, což vedlo k řadě komplikací v procesu produkce znalostí. V této práci se zabýváme tím, jak neoliberální univerzita a neoliberální epistemologie zasahují do procesu produkce znalostí domorodých obyvatel Brazílie. Použitou metodou je bibliografická analýza tématu jako celku a následná diskuse o tom, jak ovlivňuje domorodé obyvatele na univerzitách. Z institucionálního hlediska neoliberalismus ovládl různé procesy uvnitř univerzity, vytvořil velmi konkurenční vědeckou kulturu a několik finančních problémů, které podkopávají práci v těchto institucích. Dále vidíme formování neoliberálního způsobu myšlení a produkce znalostí, který je hluboce individualistický, meritokratický a ekonomický. Poté se zabýváme tím, jak domorodí obyvatelé trpí těmito tlaky v mnoha ohledech, jako je marginalizace jejich znalostí, vymazávání jejich kultury ve vědeckém prostředí, tření s neoliberální logikou obecně, rozdíly v cílech jejich práce a další. Došli jsme k závěru, že ačkoli neoliberální univerzita a epistemologie ovlivňují všechny ve vědecké oblasti, marginalizované skupiny, jako jsou domorodé komunity, na tom jsou obzvláště hůře. Tento problém vyžaduje pozornost, pokud chceme tyto komunity integrovat do akademické sféry.
Neoliberalismus; produkce znalostí; domorodé obyvatelstvo; domorodé komunity; neoliberální univerzita; neoliberální epistemologie
Andrade, Daniel Pereira (2022): Rodadas históricas de neoliberalização no Brasil. Contemporânea-Revista de Sociologia da UFSCar, 12(3), 675-708.
ANDRADE, Rodrigo de Oliveira (2021): Ciência à míngua. Pesquisa FAPESP (online). https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/ciencia-a-mingua/
Azevedo, Plauto Faraco de (2001): Direito, epistemologia e neoliberalismo. Crítica Jurídica Nueva Época, (19). 139-156.
Bell, Marissa – Lewis, Neil (2022): Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it? Public Understanding of Science, 32(3), 304-321.
Bluden, Andy (2018): Marxists Internet Archive Encyclopedia (online). https://www.marxists.org/encyclopedia/terms/s/u.htm#surplus-value
Bollettin, Paride –Tromboni, Marco (2021): Anthropology and Museums: Notes from a Course in Bahia, Brazil. Teaching and Learning Anthropology, 4(2), 27-48
Boulton, Geoffrey – Koley, Moumita (2024): More is not better: the developing crisis of scientific publishing. International Science Council [online]. https://council.science/blog/more-is-not-better-the-developing-crisis-of-scientific-publishing/
Bourdieu, Pierre (2004): Usos sociais da ciência. São Paulo: Unesp.
Castorina, JA (2018): La producción de conocimientos en la universidad pública. Las consecuencias del corporativismo. Rev del IICE, (44), 113-132.
Dal’ Bó, Talita Lazarin (2020): Estudantes indígenas nas universidades: sobre modos de conhecer, de construir relações e de traduzir conhecimentos. In: Processos e efeitos da produção de conhecimentos com populações indígenas : algumas contribuições. Goiânia: Editora da Imprensa Universitária, 75-120
Dardot, Pierre – Laval, Christian (2016): A nova razão do mundo. São Paulo: Boitempo editorial.
Davi, Hendrik et al. (2021): How has neoliberalism weakened science? Natures Sciences Sociétés, 29 (3), 356-359
Dominguez, Virginia – Perelman, Mariano (2024): Neoliberalism, universities, and anthropology around the world: introduction. Etnográfica. Revista do Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia, (28 (2)), 463-478.
Erdösová, Zuzana (2018): Interculturalidad para Chiapas en el siglo XXI. Un diálogo entre la lógica neoliberal y el mundo indígena en la Universidad Intercultural de Chiapas (UNICH). In La lógica neoliberal y su impacto en el Estado mexicano. Un enfoque multidisciplinario (pp. 115-154). Tuxtla Gutiérrez: Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas.
Gahman, L. (2016): Zapatismo versus the neoliberal university. The radicalization of pedagogy, 73-125.
Hall, C. Michael – Page, Stephen J. (2015): Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance? Tourism Management, 51, 309-312.
Hermanowicz, Joseph C. (2016): The proliferation of publishing: Economic rationality and ritualized productivity in a neoliberal era. The American Sociologist, 47, 174-191.
Heuritsch, Julia (2021): Reflexive behaviour: how publication pressure affects research quality in astronomy. Publications, 9(4), 52.
Inkpen, Rob –Gauci, Ritienne – Gibson, Andy (2021): The values of open data. Area, 53(2), 240-246.
Jones, Michael Richard Handley (2017): Can research quality be measured quantitatively? On quality of scholarship, numerical research indicators and academic publishing-experiences from Norway. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 195(2), 164-174.
Kidman, Joanna (2020): Whither decolonisation? Indigenous scholars and the problem of inclusion in the neoliberal university. Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 247-262.
Kiesewetter, Rebekka (2020): Publishables. Diseña, (16), 58-87.
Kludasch, Nara Lares – Bollettin, Paride (2022): Decoloniality of knowledge: Scientific dissemination of indigenous women productions. Anthropologia. Integra, 13 (2), 39-44.
Madikizela-Madiya, Nomanesi (2023): Transforming higher education spaces through ethical research publication: a critique of the publish or perish aphorism. Higher education research & development, 42(1), 186-199.
Marx, Karl – Engels, Friedrich (1848): The communist manifesto. New York: Communist League
Medeiros, Jackson da Silva (2017): Abordagem bourdieusiana para uma análise de campo: um enfoque para a comunicação científica e o acesso aberto. Em Questão, 23(3), 98-119.
Nespor, Jan (2018). Markets and violence: Qualitative research and the Neoliberal future. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(8), 519-531.
Nwagwu, Williams Ezinwa (2018): Knowledge Production Ethos and Open Access Publishing: Africa in Focus/L'éthos de la production de connaissances et l'édition en livre accès: Regard sur l'Afrique. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 42(3), 249-277.
Palhares, Isabela (2023): Orçamento do conhecimento encolheu R$ 117 bilhões na última década no Brasil. (online). https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/educacao/2023/12/orcamento-do-conhecimento-encolheu-r-117-bilhoes-na-ultima-decada-no-brasil.shtml
Patel, Kamna – North, Amy (2022): An introduction to revisiting development studies education and an invitation to rethink teaching, learning and knowledge production in the neoliberal university. Progress in Development Studies, 22(3), 211-221.
Ponzio, Felipe Andrade (2017): Prever e executar: breve ensaio sobre a epistemologia neoliberal (master's dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. 81 p.
Rast, Maria Charlotte (2022): Walls, cracks and change: The challenges and opportunities of critically engaged research within current academic and refugee research structures. Critical Sociology, 48(3), 501-516.
Rego, Teresa Cristina (2014): Produtivismo, pesquisa e comunicação científica: entre o veneno e o remédio. Educação e Pesquisa, 40, 325-346.
Romero, Mar Rodríguez (2015): El paisaje amenazante de la producción de conocimiento científico en educación bajo el capitalismo cognitivo. RIFOP: Revista interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado: continuación de la antigua Revista de Escuelas Normales, 29(82), 35-48.
Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2022): Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities. Nature, 603(7901), 363-363.
Sánchez, Lucía Gómez – Rico, Francisco Jódar – Sánchez, María Jesús Bravo (2015): Gubernamentalidad neoliberal y producción de conocimiento en la universidad: genealogía de una configuración subjetiva. Universitas Psychologica, 14(SPE5), 1735-1750.
Sepúlveda, Víctor M. Figueroa (2012): Scientific Labor and Universities within Globalization. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 11(3), 352-373.
Shazeb, Zakia – Shahzeb, Khan (2017): Neoliberal epistemology in Pakistani anglophone fiction. South Asian Studies, 32 (2), pp.445 – 454.
Shizha, Edward (2011): Neoliberal globalisation, science education and African indigenous knowledges. In Critical perspectives on neoliberal globalization, development and education in Africa and Asia (pp. 15-31). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Soares, Ana Manoela Primo dos Santos (2022): A autoria coletiva ea autoetnografia: experiências em antropologia com as parentas Karipuna do Amapá. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 17(2): e20210026.
Xikrin, Bepky – Bollettin, Paride (2022): Reappropriating the Trincheira-Bacaja Indigenous Land. Visual Ethnography 11(1), 149-162. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12835/ve2022.1-109.
Xiong, Weiyan (2022): Ethnic minority and indigenous higher education in the globalization: Neoliberal challenges and opportunities for policies and institutions. Discourses of Globalisation and Higher Education Reforms: Emerging Paradigms, 169-177.
Zacariotti, Daniel: É possível falar em epistemologia queer encorpada em um mundo neoliberal? (online). https://www.academia.edu/44749373/É_possível_falar_em_epistemologia_queer_encorpada_em_um_mundo_neoliberal
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
Copyright © 2025 Maria Elisabeth Vasconcellos Monteiro