Methods Of Gaining And Evaluating Plantograms Comparison
Vol.11,No.2(2017)
This paper deals comparison methods of gaining and evaluating plantograms. The primary goal was to verify the similarity of results of plantographic measurements that were carried out on two different platforms – Emed and PodoCam. The second goal of this paper was to evaluate and compare gained plantograms using three methods of evaluating plantograms, specifically Chippaux-Šmiřák (simplified), Sztriter-Godunov and Segment Method. While comparing the platforms we learnt that using the Wilcoxon pair test, that plantograms gained on Emed and PodoCam platforms differed significantly. Emed generates plantograms testifying mostly high foot arches, while PodoCam with the same people reported the foot arch to be standard or even slightly flat. While comparing three chosen evaluation methods on individual platforms, we primarily used Friedman ANOVA test. We noticed statistically significant difference for plantograms gained on the PodoCam platform which Wilcoxon pair test confirmed. For plantograms from the Emed platform Friedman ANOVA did not show any statistically significant difference. Based on the afore mentioned results we recommend the use of PodoCam and within the verified evaluating methods we recommend Sztriter-Godunov method. For evaluating high foot arches, it would be appropriate to use Chippaux-Šmiřák method.
Emed; PodoCam; Chippaux-Šmiřák; Sztriter-Godunov; Method of Foot Segments; foot arch
37–46
Bauer, K., Mosca, V. S. & Zionts, L. E. (2016). What's new in pediatric flatfoot? Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 36(8), 865-869. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000582
Buda, R., Di Caprio, F., Bedetti, L., Mosca, M. & Giannini, S. (2013). Foot overuse diseases in rock climbing: an epidemiologic study. Journal Of The American Podiatric Medical Association, 103(2), 113-120.https://doi.org/10.7547/1030113
Carr II, J. B., Yang, S., & Lather, L. A. (2016). Pediatric pes planus: A stateofthe-art review. Pediatrics, 137(3).
Dolana, P. (2016). Analýza stavu nožní klenby u vybrané skupiny sportovců. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Gúth, A. a kol. (2004). Vyšetrovacie metodiky v rehabilitácii pre fyzioterapeutov. Bratislava: Liečreh Gúth.
Hafer, J. F., Lenhoff, M. W., Song, J., Jordan, J. M., Hannan, M. T., & Hillstrom, H. J. (2013). Reliability of plantar pressure platforms. Gait and Posture, 38(3), 544-548.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.028
Chevalier, T. L., Hodgins, H., & Chockalingam, N. (2010). Plantar pressure measurements using an in-shoe system and a pressure platform: A comparison. Gait and Posture, 31(3), 397-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.016
Klementa, J. (1987). Somatometrie nohy: frekvence některých ortopedických vad z hlediska praktického využití v lékařství, školství a ergonomii. Praha: SPN.
Kopecký, M. (2004). Plantografické metody a jejich využití při monitorování klenby nohy v praxi. Česká kinatropologie. 8(1), 27-40.
Máčková, L. (2015). Plantografie u dětí mladšího školního věku - porovnání plantogramů. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Medsport (2010). PodoCam - MEDsport. Dostupné 10. 5. 2017 z: http://www.medsport.cz/eshop-podocam.html
Petr, J. (2010). Diagnostika stavu nožní klenby a chodidla prostřednictvím systému emed. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Přidalová, M., Najdekrová, J. & Riegerová, J. (2004). Analýza stavu chodidla u různých sportovních skupin. Česká antropologie. Česká společnost antropologická, 54, 156-159.
Rosenbaum, A. J., Lisella, J., Patel, N., & Phillips, N. (2014). The cavus foot. Medical Clinics of North America, 98(2), 301-312.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2013.10.008
Steinhauserová, A. (2017). Analýza stavu nožní klenby u hokejistů. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Šenkýř, J. (2011). Diagnostika stavu nožní klenby u judistů. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Tofel, T. (2015). Diagnostika stavu nožní klenby u lezců. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Troiano, G., Nante, N., & Citarelli, G. L. (2017). Pes planus and pes cavus in southern Italy: A 5 years study. Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore Di Sanita, 53(2), 142-145.
Zavadil, J. (2017). Analýza stavu nožní klenby u hokejistů. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Zuil-Escobar, J. C., Martínez-Cepa, C. B., Martín-Urrialde, J. A., & Gómez-Conesa, A. (2016). Reliability and accuracy of static parameters obtained from ink and pressure platform footprints. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 39(7), 510-517.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2018 Studia sportiva