Evaluation Motor According To Development Motor Standards In The Czech Population

Vol.7,No.2(2013)

Abstract

Evaluation development of motor skills in the context of the assessment evaluation tools is a very complicated issue. The aim of this study was to analysis and compare three assessment diagnostic tools with BOT-2. The OTDP, TGMD-2 and MABC-2 which are the most widespread tools for the studying of psychomotor development of children and adults with the standard norms in the Czech population. Bruininks-Oseretzky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2) series for Czech conditions has not been standardised yet. The Bruininks-Oseretzky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2) showed the best design in the test’s structure in comparison to three diagnostic tools. The BOT-2 psychomotor test has the widest age range of subjects. BOT-2 achieves a higher validity and is more reliable (0,90 to 0,97). Another advantage was the short form of the test battery, called Short Form. Because of these reasons we believe the Bruininks-Oseretzky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT2) should be a part of the standardised assessment tools, which evaluate the psychomotor development in the Czech population.


Keywords:
evaluation; development standards; psychomotor development; Bruininks-Oseretzky Test of Motor Proficiency
References

Blahutková, M., Klenková, J., & Zichová, D. (2005). Psychomotorické hry pro děti s poruchami pozornosti a pro hyperaktivní děti: Masarykova univerzita.

Bruininks, R. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Bruininks, R., Steffens, K., Spiegel, A., & Werder, J. (1989). The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency:Development, research, and intervention strategies. Paper presented at the 2nd International Symposium Psychomotor Therapy and Adapted Physical Activity. Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.

Bruininks, R. H. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, (BOT-2). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.

Burton, A. W., & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement skill assessment: Human Kinetics Publishers.

Cairney, J., Hay, J. A., Faught, B. E., Wade, T. J., Corna, L., & Flouris, A. (2005). Developmental coordination disorder, generalized self-efficacy toward physical activity, and participation in organized and free play activities. The Journal of pediatrics, 147(4), 515-520.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.013

Cools, W., De Martelaer, K., Samaey, C., & Andries, C. (2008). Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. Journal of sports science and medicine, 8, 154-168.

Čelikovský, S. (1990). Antropomotorika pro studující tělesnou výchovu. 3. vyd., Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1990, 288 s.

Černá, M. (1995). Kapitoly z psychopedie. Praha: UK, 1995.

Flegel, J., & Kolobe, T. H. (2002). Predictive validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency at school age. Physical Therapy, 82(8), 762-771.

Folio, R., & Fewell, R. R. (1983). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards: Manual: Pro-Ed.

Goodwin, L. D., & Leech, N. L. (2003). The Meaning of Validity in the New Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing: Implications for Measurement Courses. Measurement and evaluation in Counseling and Development.

Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (1992). Movement assessment battery for children: Psychological Corporation.

Kiphard, E. J., & Schilling, F. (1974). Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder: KTK: Beltz Test.

Kohoutek, R., & Krkošková, A. (2002). Základy užité psychologie: Akademické nakladatelství CERM.

Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., & Getchell, N. (2011). The comparison of performances of preschool children on two motor assessments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(3), 715-723. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.06.25.pms.113.6.715-723

Měkota, K., & Blahuš, P. (1983). Motorické testy v tělesné výchově: SPN.

Měkota, K., & Cuberek, R. (2007). Pohybové dovednosti, činnosti, výkony. 1. vyd. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, 2007

Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2007). Human Motor Development: A Lifespan Approach: McGraw-Hill.

Psotta, R., & Hendl, J.(2012). The movement assessment battery for children - 2: cross-cultural comparison between 11-15 years old children from the Czech Republic and United Kingdom. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis.

Roeber, B. J., Tober, C. L., Bolt, D. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2012). Gross motor development in children adopted from orphanage settings. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54(6), 527-531.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04257.x

Siegel, J. C., Marchetti, M., & Tecklin, J. S. (1991). Age related balance changes in hearing-impaired children.Physical Therapy, 71(3), 183-189.

Simons, J. (2004). Introductie tot de psychomotoriek: Garant.

Simons, J., & Van Hombeeck, C. (2003). Toepasbaarheid van de Test of Gross Motor Development, second edition. Kine varia, 39, 16-21.

Svoboda, M., Krejčířová, D., & Vágnerová, M. (2001). Psychodiagnostika dětí a dospívajících: Portál.

Tan, S. K., Parker, H. E., & Larkin, D. (2001). Concurrent validity of motor tests used to identify children with motor impairment. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.

Ulrich, A. (1985). TGMD, Test of Gross Motor Development: PRO-ED.

Ulrich, A. (2000). Test of gross motor development-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Valentini, N. C. (2012). Validity and Reliability of the TGMD-2 for Brazilian Children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 44(4), 275-280.https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2012.700967

Vallaey, M., & Vandroemme, G. (1994). Psychomotoriek bij kinderen: Acco.

Visser, J., & Jongmans, M. (2004). Extending the Movement Assessment Battery for Children to be suitable for 3-year-olds in the Netherlands. Unpublished manuscript.

Wang, H. Y., Long, I. M., & Liu, M. F. (2012). Relationships between task-oriented postural control and motor ability in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6), 1792-1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.002

Wilson, B. N., Kaplan, B. J., Crawford, S. G., Campbell, A., & Dewey, D. (2000). Reliability and validity of a parent questionnaire on childhood motor skills. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(5), 484-493. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.5.484

Wilson, B. N., Polatajko, H. J., Kaplan, B. J., & Faris, P. (1995). Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency in occupational-therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.1.8

Wise, R. A., & Bozarth, M. A. (1987). A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychological review,94(4), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.469

Wuang, Y. P., Lin, Y. H., & Su, C. Y. (2009). Rasch analysis of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1132-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.003

Wuang, Y. P., Su, C. Y., & Huang, M. H. (2012). Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(6),567-578.

Zimmer, R., & Volkamer, M. (1987). Motoriktest für vier- bis sechsjährige Kinder: Mot 4-6; Manual: Beltz-Test.

Metrics

0


595

Views

2086

PDF (Čeština) views