Construction and Validation of Newly Developed Triangle Test of Reactive Agility in School Children
Vol.16,No.2(2022)
PURPOSE: Agility is described as a rapid whole-body movement with change of velocity or direction in response to the different stimuli. Scientific research identified two independent types of agility performances: pre-planned agility (CODS) and non-planned agility (RAG). CODS represent generic movement patterns. They can mimic the demands of a sport but all of the movements are pre-planned. In CODS there is no response to a stimulus like in RAG where movements are in response to cues such as the movements of the ball or actions of the opposition players. Literature review show lack of studies that assessed CODS and RAG in children, most probably due insufficiency in quality testing protocols. Hence, the purpose of this study was construction and validation of newly developed agility test that measures RAG performances in children. METHODS: For this purpose, the Blaze Pod system (BP) was used. Three lighting pods were mounted on three 50 cm cones in triangle formation with 4,5 meters distance between cones (TRGA). Results were collected via BP app. Four movement patterns were used to test RAG. Start and finish of the tests were conducted with the tap on BP pods. The sample comprised of 80 elementary school children (boys; n=39, age=14.88±0.36 yrs, height=174,3±7,46 cm, mass 67,86±16,78 kg, and girls; n=41, age=14.85±0.31 yrs, height=167.49±5.72 cm, mass=59.34±10.54 kg). Statistical analysis included calculation of normality of distribution, reliability coefficients, correlations and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Tests showed acceptable reliability with CA=0.58, ICC=0.32 for boys and CA=0.78, ICC=0.55 for girls. Inter-item correlations were higher in girls’ sample (r=0.49-0.64) than in boys (r=0.27-0.41). Also, test showed good sensitivity, normal data distribution and good homogeneity with no differences between items (boys; F=0.07, p=0.93; girls; F=0.13, p=0.88). Better reliability of TRAG test for girls is most probably caused by gender morphological differences. Namely, we observed greater standard deviations (SD) of height (BH) and mass (BM) in boys (boys; BH=7.37, BM=16.97; girls; BH=5.68, BM=9.7) and scientific research confirmed negative influence of BM and BH on reactive agility performance. CONCLUSION: Altogether, newly constructed TRGA test seems to be reliable instrument for measuring reactive agility in pubescent boys and girls.
Keywords: non-planned agility, metric characteristics, pubescents, gender
127–133
Acar, H., & Eler, N. (2019). The Effect of Balance Exercises on Speed and Agility in Physical Education Lessons. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 74-79.
Dugdale, J. H., Sanders, D., & Hunter, A. M. (2020). Reliability of change of direction and agility assessments in youth soccer players. Sports, 8(4), 51.
Eler, N., & Eler, S. (2018). The Effect of Agility Exercises on the COD Speed and Speed in Terms of the Frequency of the Training. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9).
Jeffreys, I. (2006). Motor learning-applications for agility, part 1. Strength and conditioning journal, 28(5), 72.
Krolo, A., Gilic, B., Foretic, N., Pojskic, H., Hammami, R., Spasic, M., . . . Sekulic, D. (2020). Agility testing in youth football (soccer) players; evaluating reliability, validity, and correlates of newly developed testing protocols. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(1), 294.
Paul, D. J., & Nassis, G. P. (2015). Physical fitness testing in youth soccer: Issues and considerations regarding reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Pediatric exercise science, 27(3), 301-313.
Pojskic, H., Åslin, E., Krolo, A., Jukic, I., Uljevic, O., Spasic, M., & Sekulic, D. (2018). Importance of reactive agility and change of direction speed in differentiating performance levels in junior soccer players: Reliability and validity of newly developed soccer-specific tests. Frontiers in physiology, 9, 506.
Pokrajčić, V., Marić, D., Foretić, N., & Uljević, O. (2021). Reliability of the newly developed tests of handball specific change of direction speed and reactive agility. Asian Exercise and Sport Science Journal, 5(2), 28-35.
Sekulic, D., Foretic, N., Gilic, B., Esco, M. R., Hammami, R., Uljevic, O., . . . Spasic, M. (2019). Importance of agility performance in professional futsal players; Reliability and applicability of newly developed testing protocols. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3246.
Sekulic, D., Pehar, M., Krolo, A., Spasic, M., Uljevic, O., Calleja-González, J., & Sattler, T. (2017). Evaluation of basketball-specific agility: applicability of preplanned and nonplanned agility performances for differentiating playing positions and playing levels. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 31(8), 2278-2288.
Sekulic, D., Spasic, M., & Esco, M. R. (2014). Predicting agility performance with other performance variables in pubescent boys: a multiple-regression approach. Perceptual and motor skills, 118(2), 447-461.
Serpell, B. G., Ford, M., & Young, W. B. (2010). The development of a new test of agility for rugby league. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(12), 3270-3277.
Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(9), 919-932.
Sporis, G., Jukic, I., Milanovic, L., & Vucetic, V. (2010). Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(3), 679-686.
Uljevic, O., Esco, M. R., & Sekulic, D. (2014). Reliability, validity, and applicability of isolated and combined sport-specific tests of conditioning capacities in top-level junior water polo athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 28(6), 1595-1605.
Vicente-Rodríguez, G., Rey-López, J. P., Ruíz, J. R., Jiménez-Pavón, D., Bergman, P., Ciarapica, D., . . . Moreno, L. A. (2011). Interrater reliability and time measurement validity of speed–agility field tests in adolescents. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 25(7), 2059-2063.
Young, W. B., McDowell, M. H., & Scarlett, B. J. (2001). Specificity of sprint and agility training methods. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 15(3), 315-319.
Young, W. B., & Willey, B. (2010). Analysis of a reactive agility field test. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(3), 376-378.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2023 Studia sportiva