The Selfish Gene as a Possible Driving Force Behind HIIT
Vol.16,No.2(2022)
Purpose: High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is a training method aimed at increasing the fitness of individuals. It is based on a combination of periods in which high-intensity alternate with low-intensity exercise or passive rest. The topic of this paper is a reflection on the benefits and risks of HIIT health use in recreational athletes. We investigate humans' conscious and unconscious motivations for choosing this specific method in the philosophical discourse. Problem: HIIT is a method that, in some ways and with particular approaches, strongly reflects the imperative of the postmodern age - to get as much as possible, as quickly as possible. Martin Heidegger perceives three fundamental existentials in the context of temporality – historicity, everydayness, and within-time-ness. Here conscious motivation may be linked to the temporal characteristic of human being. As Richard Dawkins presents, unconscious motivation may be related to the application of the selfish gene theory. The philosophical approach to the problem: The Heideggerian concept of temporality leads us to research the authenticity and inauthenticity of the Dasein phenomenon. Some features of motivation for applying HIIT can be examined as inauthentic forms of being. In focusing on possible elements of unconscious motivation, the concept of evolutionary biology, namely Dawkins's theory of the selfish gene, provides a unique platform. It is primarily (a human) effort to spread genes. Here, in connection with HIIT, we build on the concepts of replicator and vehicle and deal with the basic selection unit of evolution and its form. Conclusions: HIIT presents an exciting training method that is examined in the context of effectivity of sports training, social benefits, or health aspects. Here we would like to offer the HIIT concept as the reflection of philosophical (mainly ontological, partly ethical) discourse.
selfish gene; High-Intensity Interval Training; replicators; vehicles
158–166
Benítez-Bribiesca, L. (2001). Memetics: A dangerous idea. Interciencia 26(1), 29-31. Cimino, A. (2019). Being and existence: Kierkegaardian echoes in Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 80(4–5), 344–355. Deng, X., & Deng, J. (2015). A study of prisoner’s dilemma game model with incomplete information. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 1-10. Dawkins, Richard (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Feltovich, N. (2011). The Effect of Subtracting a Constant from all Payoffs in a Hawk-Dove Game: Experimental Evidence of Loss Aversion in Strategic Behavior. Southern Economic Journal, 77(4), 814–826. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.
Houdek, T. (2012). Nástroje a lidské bytosti. Svoboda a limity univerzálního darwinismu. [Instruments and human beings: Freedom and the limitation of Universal Darwinism]. Praha: Diplomová práce. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Fakulta humanitních studií.
Hurych, E. (2013). Duchovní rozměr pohybu v sekularizující se společnosti. [The Spiritual Dimensoin of movemnet in the secularized Society]. Brno: Masaryk University. Jalasvuori, M. (2012). Vehicles, Replicators, and Intercellular Movement of Genetic Information: Evolutionary Dissection of a Bacterial Cell. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 874153. Ridley, M. (1996). The Origins of Virtue. London: Penguin Books. Roozbahani, M., Moinzadeh, M. (2020). Reconstruct Heidegger's philosophy around the concept of "Gestell". Philosophy of Science, 10(19), 79-103.
Rutherford, A. (2016). As long as we study life, it will be read: The selfish gene returns 40. The Guardian. Avaliable at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/29/selfish-gene-40-years-richard-dawkins-do-ideas-stand-up-adam-rutherford.
Schrempp, G. (2009). Taking the Dawkins Challenge, or, The Dark Side of the Meme. Journal of Folklore Research, 46(1), 91-100. Yang, R. (2021). Application of Game Theory in a Social Experiment Based on Hawk-Dove Model. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 203. Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021), 3077-3082. West, J. (2020). The Selfish Meme: Dawkins, Peirce, Freud. Semiotica 2020(236-237), 199-213.
Zrzavý, J. (2022). Proč vraždíme manželky častěji než sestry? Může za to sobecký gen. Idnes/magazíny. Avaliable at: https://www.idnes.cz/onadnes/zdravi/evolucni-biolog-prof-jan-zrzavy-rozhovor.A191003_160702_zdravi_ber.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2023 Studia sportiva