Caricature in the Case Law of the Czech Constitutional Court: Protection of Dignity versus Freedom of Expression

Vol.26,No.3(2018)

Jan Broz

https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2018-3-6

PDF (Čeština)
Abstract
Political caricature represents a highly specific form of the realisation of freedom of expression, the adequate reflexion of which requires a specific preunderstanding of the addressee concerning the meaning and aim of the caricature. In this regard we can consider caricature as culturally conditioned. Its current usage is therefore increasingly confronted with the limits consisting in the cultural diversity of society as well as with the expanding limitation on freedom of expression due to the emphasis on the importance of other conflicting rights, notably the right to human dignity. This paper analyses the presence of the latter limit in the case law of the Czech Constitutional Court by comparing this case law with decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court and the US Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the case law of both foreign courts can be considered as substantially different, it in both cases reflects deeper normative ideas on the substance of human dignity of public persons participating in the political discourse. To the contrary, the Czech case law can be considered as inconsistent and leading from one extreme interpretation to another. Such an approach is generally objectionable due to the violation of the principle of consistency and foreseeability of judicial decision-making. In the case of political caricature, the inconsistency is amplified by the fact that judicial decision-making influences the scope and form of political discussion, usually in a way that disadvantages those who try to strengthen their otherwise weaker voice in the public discourse by an expressive feature: caricature. However, this limitation casts doubt on the basic premise of democracy, i. e. communicative rationality of citizens.

Keywords:
Caricature; Human Dignity; Freedom of Expression.

Pages:
493–516
References

ANDERSEN, H. Ch. Císařovy nové šaty. Překl. V. Košťálová. Praha: Mladá fronta, 1948.

BAKER, E. Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

BARENDT, E. Freedom of Speech. 2. vyd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

BULL, H. Freiheit und Grenzen des politischen Meinungskampfes. In: BADURA, P. a H. DREIER (Hrsg.). Festschrift 50 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2. vyd. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.

CARMI, G. Dignity versus Liberty: The Two Western Cultures of Free Speech. Boston University International Law Journal, 2008, roč. 26.

COHEN, J. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: BOHMAN, J. a W. REHQ (eds.). Deliberativy Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.

GÄRTNER, S. Was die Satire darf: eine Gesamtbetrachtung zu den rechtlichen Grenzen einer Kunstform. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2009.

GOUNALAKIS, G. Freiräume und Grenzen politischer Karikatur und Satire. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1995, roč. 48, č. 13.

GRABENWARTERM Ch. a T. MARAUHN. Grundrechtseingriff und –schranken. In: GROTE, R. a T. MARAUHN (Hrsg.). EMRK/GG Konkordanzkommentar. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.

GRIFFIN, J. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

GRIMM, D. Die Meinungsfreiheit in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1995, roč. 48, č. 27.

GROTE, R. a N. WENZEL. Meinungsfreiheit. In: GROTE, R. a T. MARAUHN (Hrsg.). EMRK/GG Konkordanzkommentar. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.

HERCZEG, J. Dopad virtuální koule aneb meze politické satiry. Právní rozhledy, 2011, roč. 19, č. 7.

CHAUER, F. Free speech: a philosophical inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

CHEMERINSKY, E. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. 5. vyd. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.

ISENSEE, J. Grundrecht auf Ehre. In: ZIEMSKE, B. (Hrsg.). Staatsphilosophie und Rechtspolitik. München: C. H. Beck, 1997.

JACKSON, V. Constitutional Dialogue and Human Dignity. Montreal Law Review, 2004, roč. 65, s. 15–40.

MOLEK, P. Základní práva: Důstojnost. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2017.

MÖLLER, K. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

NOLTE, G. (ed.). European and US Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

OECHSLER, J. Die Satire: Rechtliche Grenzen eines Kulturinstituts. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2017, roč. 70, č. 11.

POST, R. The Constitutional Concept of Public Discourse. Harvard Law Review. 1990, roč. 103.

RAO, N. Three Concepts of Dignity in Constitutional Law. Notre Dam Law Review, 2011, roč. 86, č. 1.

ROSTBØLL, Ch. Freedom of expression, deliberation, autonomy and respect. European Journal of Political Theory, 2011, roč. 10.

SCANLON, T. A theory of freedom of expression. In: SCANLON, T. The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, s. 6–25.

STERN, K. a F. BECKER (Hrsg.). Grundrechte – Kommentar. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2010.

STRAUSS, D. Persuasion. Autonomy, and Freedom of Expression. Columbia Law Review, 1991, roč. 91, s. 334–371.

VESTING, T. Soziale Geltungsansprüche in fragmentierten Öffentlichkeit. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, 1997, roč. 122, č. 3

WALDRON, J. Dignity and Rank. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 2007, roč. 48.

WALDRON, J. Dignity, Rank, and Rights. In: YOUNG, S. (ed.). The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: The Utah University Press, 2011, Vol. 29, s. 207–253.

WALDRON, J. How Law Protects Dignity. Cambridge Law Journal, 2012, roč. 71, č. 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000256

WALDRON, J. The Harm in the Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

WHITMAN, J. Q. Enforcing Civility and Respect: Three Societies. Yale Law Journal, 2000, roč. 109, s. 1279–1398.

WHITMAN, J. Q. Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty. Yale Law Journal, 2004, roč. 113, s. 1151–1221.

WHITMAN, J. Q. Human dignity in Europe and the United States: the social foundations. In: NOLTE, G. (ed.). European and US Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0

1043

Views

505

PDF (Čeština) views

Copyright © 2018 Jan Broz

PDF (Čeština)