Dissenting Opinions as Future Majority Opinions

Vol.25,No.3(2017)

Abstract
This article deals with transformation of dissenting opinions into majority opinions. It identifies three types of transformation of dissenting opinions into majority opinions, analyses the main features of each type of transformation, and discusses its advantages and disadvantages for the dissenting judge. Theoretical findings are supplemented by specific examples of transformation of dissent into a majority opinion, which come mainly from the case law of the US Supreme Court.

Keywords:
Dissent; Separate Opinion; Majority Opinion; Judge; US Supreme Court.

Pages:
509–520
Author biography

Ondřej Stypa

Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno

student
References

BAIRD Vanessa a Tonja JACOBI. How the dissent becomes the majority: using federalism to transform coalitions in US supreme court. Duke law journal, 2009, vol. 59, no. 2.

FINKELMAN, Paul. Scott V. Sandford: The Court’s Most Dreadful Case and How It Changed History. Chicago-Kent law review, 2007, vol. 82, no. 3.

FRIEDMAN, Barry. The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. Arizona). Georgetown Law Journal, 2010, vol. 99, no. 1, s. 6–8.

GINSBURG, Ruth Bader. The role of dissenting opionion. Minnesota law review, 2010, vol. 95, no. 1, s. 4.

GROVES, Harry E. Separate but Equal—The Doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson. Phylon, 1951, vol. 12, no. 1, s. 66–72.

L‘HEUREUX-DUBÉ, Claire. The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future? Ogoode hall law journal [online]. 2000, vol. 38, no. 3, s. 496 [cit. 2017-06-20]. Dostupné z: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1499 & context=ohlj

LYNCH, Andrew. The Intelligence of a Future Day’: The Vindication of Constitutional Dissent in the High Court Australia – 1981–2003. Sydney law review, 2007, vol. 29, no. 2, s. 220.

MAHMOUD, Martina. Disenty soudců. Brno, 2009, 58 s. Diplomová práce. Masarykova Univerzita, Právnická fakulta.

ONDŘEJKOVÁ, Jana. Výběr soudců Ústavního soudu ČR. Právník, 2016, roč. 155, č. 11.

PATTERSON, James T. Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

RE, Richard M. Narrowing Supreme Court Precedent from Below. Georgetown Law Journal, 2016, vol. 104, no. 4, s. 927–932.

SENIOR, Jannifer. Conversation: Antonin Scalia. In: nymag.com [online]. 6. 10. 2013 [cit. 2017-06-20]. Dostupné z: http://nymag.com/news/features/antonin-scalia-2013-10/

SCHOENIG, John. Parental Choice, Catholic Schools, and Educational Pluralism at the Dawn of a New Era in K-12 Education Reform. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 2013, vol. 27, no. 2.

ŠPAČKOVÁ, Eva. Role rozhodnutí vyšších soudních instancí v procesu sjednocování judikatury, Praha, 2009, 87 s. Diplomová práce. Univerzita Karlova, Právnická fakulta.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0


920

Views

324

PDF (Čeština) views