Automatizácia súdneho rozhodovania ako ochrana nedistributívnych práv

ABRUSCI, E., SCOTT, R. The questionable necessity of a new human right against being subject to automated decision-making. International Journal of Law and Technology. 2023, roč. 31, č. 2, s. 114–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad013

ALAKWE, K. Human Dignity in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics: Issues and Prospects. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies. 2023, roč. 5, č. 6, s. 87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.6.10

ALEXY, R. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

ANDERSON, D. The convergence of ADR and ODR within the courts: The impact on access to justice. Civil Justice Quarterly. 2019, roč. 38, č. 1, s. 126–143.

ANTER, A. The Modern State and Its Monopoly on Violence. In: HANDKE, E. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Max Weber. Oxford: OUP, 2019, s. 226–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679545.013.13

ASSIMOV, I. Oceľové jaskyne. Argo, 2012.

AYSOLMAZ, B. a kol. The public perceptions of algorithmic decision-making systems: Results from a large-scale survey. Telematics and Informatics [online]. 2023, roč. 79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101954

BAMFORTH, N. Articles 13 and 35(1), Subsidiarity, and the Effective Protection of European Convention Rights in National Law. European Human Rights Law Review. Sweet and Maxwell, 2016, č. 5, s. 501–517.

BEKKUM, M. a kol. Digital welfare fraud detection and the Dutch SyRI judgment. European Journal of Social Security [online]. 2021, roč. 23, č. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627211031257

BENSON, P. Abstract Right and The Possibility of a Nondistributive Conception of Contract: Hegel and Contemporary Contract Theory. Cardozo Law Review. 1989, č. 10.

BERGER, V. Judikatura Evropského soudu pro lidská práva. IFEC, 2003.

BRKAN, M. Do algorithms rule the world? Algorithmic decision-making and data protection in the framework of the GDPR and beyond. International Journal of Law and Technology. 2019, roč. 27, č. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eay017

CAMPAGNA, N. Leviathan and Its Judges. ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. 2000, roč. 86, č. 4, s. 499–517. Dostupné z: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23681490

CEPEJ. Cepej Studies No. 23: European judicial systems – Efficiency and quality of justice. Council of Europe [online]. 2016. Dostupné z: https://rm.coe.int/european-judicial-systems-efficiency-and-quality-of-justice-cepej-stud/1680786b58

CEPEJ. European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. European Commision [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/196205/COUNCIL%20OF%20EUROPE%20-%20European%20Ethical%20Charter%20on%20the%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20judicial%20systems.pdf

CORDELLA, A., CONTINI, F. Law and Technology in Civil Judicial Procedures. In: BROWNSWORD, R. a kol. The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology. Oxford, 2016, s. 246–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.47

COWEN, T. Public goods. EconLib [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PublicGoods.html

DIMYTRUK, M. The Right to a Fair Trial in Automated Civil Proceedings. Masaryk University Journal of Law and technology. 2019, roč. 13, č. 1, s. 27–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-1-2

GANS-COMBE, C. Automated Justice: Issues, Benefits and Risks in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Its Algorithms in Access to Justice and Law Enforcement. In: O‘MATHÚNA, D., IPHOFEN, R. (eds.). Ethics, Integrity and Policymaking. Springer, 2022, s. 175–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15746-2_14

GROSFELD, E. a kol. Value Alignment and Public Perceived Legitimacy of the European Union and the Court of Justice. Frontiers of psychology. 2022, roč. 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785892

HARRIS, D. a kol. Law of European Convention on Human Rights. OUP, 2009.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Philosophy of Right. Dover Philosophical Classics, 2005.

HELLWIG, P., MAIER, G. Justice and Fairness Perceptions in Automated Decision-Making – Current Findings and Design Implications. In: GRÄßLER, I. a kol. (eds.). The Digital Twin of Humans: An Interdisciplinary Concept of Digital Working Environments in Industry 4.0. Springer, 2023, s. 63–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26104-6_4

HIGH-LEVEL EXPERT GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission [online]. 2019. Dostupné z: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

HOBBES, T. Leviathan. Londýn, 1651.

HOLLÄNDER, P. Filosofie práva. Aleš Čeněk, 2006.

HOLLÄNDER, P. Základy všeobecné státovědy. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2012.

CHOUNG, H. a kol. When AI is Perceived to Be Fairer than a Human: Understanding Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in a Job Application Context. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction [online]. 2023, s. 7451–7468. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2266244

INVERARDI, P. The Challenge of Human Dignity in the Era of Autonomous Systems. In: WERTHNER, H. a kol. (eds.). Perspectives on Digital Humanism. 2022, s. 25–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86144-5_4

KALLHOFF, A. Public Goods as Obligatory Bridges between the Public and the Private. Philosophical Papers. 2022, roč. 50, s. 387–405. DOI: http://doi.org/10.​1080/05568641.2022.2046494

KAMINSKI, R. T. Escaping The Cyber State Of Nature: Cyber Deterrence And International Institutions. In: CZZOSECK, C., PODINS, K. (eds.). Conference on Cyber Conflict Proceedings. 2010.

KENDLA, K. J. Robotkohtunik: kas ulmefilm või lähitulevik? Juridica. 2024, č. 7, s. 483–495.

KIANPOUR, M. a kol. Advancing the concept of cybersecurity as a public good. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. [online]. 2022 roč. 22, č. 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102493

KILINÇ, B. A Trial to Understand the Concept of Fair Trial. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2016, č. 35.

KIRAT, T. a kol. Fairness and explainability in automatic decision-making systems. A challenge for computer science and law. EURO Journal on Decision Processes. 2023, roč. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100036

KMEC, J. a kol. Evropská úmluva o lidských právech: komentář. C. H. Beck, 2012.

KOSKENNIEMI, M. The Politics of International Law. Hart Publishing, 2011.

KRIŠTOFÍK, A. Vybrané aspekty práva na spravodlivý proces a automatizácia rozhodovania. Revue pro právo a technologie. 2021, roč. 12, č. 24, s. 221–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/RPT2021-2-6

KRIŠTOFÍK, A. Právo na odôvodnené rozhodnutie a algoritmizácia rozhodovacích systémov. Právnik. 2023, č. 1, s. 39–48.

KRIŠTOFÍK, A. Automatizácia vo verejnej správe v kontexte ochrany osobných údajov: holandský model zdieľania dát medzi inštitúciami. Správní právo. 2024.

LEE, R. L. The American Courts as Public Goods: Who Should Pay the Costs of Litigation? Catholic University Law Review. 1985, roč. 34, č. 2, s. 267–278.

LIU, H. a kol. Beyond State v Loomis: artificial intelligence, government algorithmization and accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology [online]. 2019, roč. 27, č. 2, s. 122–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaz001

LOADER, I., WALKER, N. Security as a global public good. In: Civilizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, s. 234–264. DOI: https://10.1017/CBO9780511611117.012

MATHIAS, K., SHANNON, D. Efficiency Instead of Justice? Searching for the Philosophical Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law. Springer, 2009.

MCGUIRE, M. C. Leviathan, Taxation, and Public Goods. In: CONGLETON, R. a kol. The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, vol. II. Oxford, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190469771.013.11

MILLER, D. Justice, democracy and public goods. In: DOWDING. K. a kol. (eds.). Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press, 2004, s. 127–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490217.008

MITTELSTADT, B., RUSSELL, Ch., WACHTER, S. Explaining Explanations in AI. FAT* ^‚19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2019, s. 279–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287574

MOLEK, P. Právo na spravedlivý proces. Wolters Kluwer, 2012.

MOORE, J. W. What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter? Frontiers of Psychology [online]. 2016, č. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272

PAPAGIANNEAS, S., JUNIUS, N. Fairness and justice through automation in China’s smart courts. Computer Law & Security Review. 2023, roč. 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105897

POLČÁK, R. Internet a proměny práva. Auditorium, 2012.

POLČÁK, R. a kol. Právní problémy kybernetické bezpečnosti. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2016.

PTÁČNIK, J. Teorie společenské smlouvy Thomase Hobbese: koncentrace koncentrace moci na úkor svobody jako prostředek ochrany proti násilí. In: NEXERA, V. a kol. Teorie společenských smluv. Analýza vybraných novověkých konceptů. Brno: Klemm, 2013.

SANDEL, M. Justice: What’s The Right thing to do. Farrar, 2002.

SCHÄFERLING, S. The Underlying Challenge to Human Agency. In: SCHÄFERLING, S. Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights: Reconciling Law and Intelligent Systems. Springer, 2023, s. 185–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48125-3_6

SCHWENNINGER, S. A New Social Contract. Challenge [online]. 2010, č. 5, roč. 53, s. 34–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132530503

SPAULDING, N. W. Online Dispute Resolution and the End of Adversarial Justice? In: ENGSTROM, D. (ed.). Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009255301.015

STARKE, Ch. a kol. Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Big Data and Society. 2021, roč. 9, č. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221115189

SUSSKIND, R. Online courts and future of justice. Oxford, 2019, s. 253–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838364.001.0001

SVOBODA, K. a kol. Občanský soudní řád: komentář. C. H. Beck, 2017.

ŠIMÁČKOVÁ, K. Právní stát nebo vláda práva? In: GERLOCH, A., KYSELA, J. 20 let Ústavy České republiky: ohlédnutí zpět a pohled vpřed. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2013, s. 167–176.

USAID. DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING COURT AUTOMATION PROJECTS Practical Guidance for USAID DRG Officers. Washington, 2019. Dostupné z: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/USAID-CAP-Guide-FINAL.pdf

VRCHA, P. Odůvodnění civilního rozsudku. Leges, 2021.

WEALE, A. Democratic Justice and the Social Contract. Oxford: OUP, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684649.001.0001

ZDRAVKOVA, K. Reconsidering human dignity in the new era. New Ideas in Psychology. 2019, roč. 54, s. 112–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.12.004

ŽIŽEK, S. Violence. Londýn: Profile Books, 2009.