The Future of the EU: Rhetoric in Service of the Commission’s Agenda?

Abstrakt

This article examines whether the White Paper on the Future of Europe the EU Commission published in March 2017, encourages real public discourse on different options for the future of Europe. In other words, are the different options of the White Paper ground for discussion in which ‘every voice will be heard’ as promised, or are there implicit restrictions to the inclusiveness incorporated in its approach?

Analyzing this document using theories on rhetoric and rhetoric techniques, it suggests that the White Paper uses rhetoric devices to create a misleading impression of inclusiveness, while in fact aiming at the same target as the Five Presidents Report of 2015: advocating for the highest degrees of integration.

Bibliografická citace

MUNIN, Nellie a Marielle MATTHEE. The Future of the EU: Rhetoric in Service of the Commission’s Agenda? Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi. [Online]. 2018, č. 1, s. 5-28. [cit. 2018-08-18]. Dostupné z: https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/8792

Klíčová slova

The EU; the Five Presidents Report; the White Paper; Rhetoric; Enhanced Integration.

Plný Text:

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

ARISTOTLE. The Art of Rhetoric. Translation and index by W. Rhys Roberts [online]. Megaphone eBooks, 2008, p. 145. Available at: http://www.wendelberger.com/downloads/Aristotle_Rhetoric.pdf

BENNETT, Bo. Relative Privation. Logically Fallacious: The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies [online]. 2012. Available at: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/155/Relative_Privation

BERLIN, James. Revisionary Histories of Rhetoric: Politics, Power and Plurality. In: VITANZA, Victor (ed.). Writing Histories of Rhetoric. Southern Illinois University Press, 2013.

CARTON, Andrew, Chad MURPHY and Jonathan CLARK. A (Blurry) Vision of the Future: How Leader Rhetoric about Ultimate Goals Influences Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, Vol. 57, no. 6.

CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

CROWE, Nicholas and David FRANK (eds.). Rhetoric in the 21st Century: an Interactive Oxford Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing, 2016.

DUNMIRE, Patricia. Preempting the future: rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 2005, Vol. 16, no. 4.

FELDMAN, Martha, Kaj SKOLDBERG, Ruth BROWN and Debra HORNER. Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2004, Vol. 14, no. 2.

GRIES, Peter. China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2004.

GROSS, Daniel. The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’ to Modern Brain Science. London: the University of Chicago Press, 2006.

HEHIR, Aidan. The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Plgrave McMillan, 2012.

JUNCKER, Jean Claude. State of the Union Address [online]. 2017. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/state-union-2017_en; http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-17-3165_en.htm

JUNCKER, Jean Claude. The White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU27 by 2025 [online]. 2017. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf

JUNCKER, Jean Claude. Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union [online], 2015. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/economic-monetary-union/docs/5-presidents-report_en.pdf

MUNIN, Nellie. The ‘Five Presidents Report’: Dogs Bark but the Caravan Moves on? The Journal of European Politics and the Society, 2016, Vol. 17, no. 3.

OBER, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

OLDS, Christopher. Assessing the Relationship between Presidential Rhetorical Simplicity and Unilateral Action. Politics and Governance, Vol. 3, no. 2, 2015, pp. 90–98 [online]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i2.303. Available at: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/303/303

SULLIVAN, Patricia. The Power of Templates Rhetoric & Powerpoint [online]. 2016. Available at: http://slideplayer.com/slide/8652100/

TAMEN, Miguel. Not Rhetoric, Truth. Law and Literature, 2009, Vol. 21, no. 1.

VAN HILVOORDE, Ivo, Agnes ELLING and Ruud STOKVIS. How to influence national pride? The Olympic medal index as a unifying narrative. International Review for the Sociology of Sport [online]. 2010, Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 87–102. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1012690209356989

VERDUIJN, Simon. Framing Strategies and Connective Capacity in Water Governance Policy: the Case of the Second Delta Committee. In: EDELENBOS, Jurian, Nanny BRESSERS and Peter SCHOLTEN (eds.). Water Governance as Connective Capacity. London & New York: Routledge, 2016.

European Court of Justice. Judgment in Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15 Slovakia and Hungary v. Council [online]. 2017. Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?num=C-643/15

YOURDICTIONARY. Examples of Rhetorical Devices [online]. 2017. Available at: http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-rhetorical-devices.html

https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2018-1-1