Regulating Access to Big Data? – Between Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Economic Regulation

Roč.31,č.4(2023)

Abstrakt

Big Data can be a monopolistic bottleneck that restricts access to downstream markets of companies that do not control the appropriate set of Big Data. This article examines both the drawbacks of competition law when applied to Big Data-driven markets as well as different possible forms of ex-ante economic regulation of access to Big Data, all with the aim of answering the research question: Is ex-post economic regulation alone insufficient to ensure access to competitively relevant Big Data, and if so, what type of ex-ante economic regulation would be most effective? In doing so it concludes that competition law is not a suitable primary tool for requesting access to Big Data for several reasons, in particular because competition law procedures are lengthy, market definition is difficult in the absence of a monetary price for the product, and markets driven by Big Data tend to be structurally inefficiently competitive. Asymmetrical ex-ante regulation is identified as the most appropriate form of regulating access to Big Data.


Klíčová slova:
Big Data; Mandated Access; Symmetric Regulation; Asymmetric Regulation; Self-Regulation

Stránky:
913–932
Reference

AKERLOF, G. Markets for Lemons: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, Vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 488–500. ISSN 0033-5533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

ARSLAN, B. Crying ‘Big’ Bad Wolf? An Economic Analysis of Big Data as a Competition Concern. College of Europe dissertation [online]. 2016 [cit. 23. 4. 2023]. Available at: https://coleurope.on.worldcat.org/search/detail/953024892?queryString=% 22big%20bad% 20 wolf%22.

BAILEY, D. Competition Policy in the Digital Era. Concurrences [online]. 2018, no. 01 [cit. 2. 4. 2023]. Available at: https://www.concurrences.com/en/review/issues/no-1-2018/editorial/editorial-85712.

BAIN, J. S. Barriers to New Competition, their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957. ISBN 978-0674062009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674188037

BASEN, S. Competition, Privacy, and Big Data. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology. Washington DC: Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, 2020, Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 63–88.

BOTTA, M. Sector Regulation of Digital Platforms in Europe: uno, nessuno e centomila. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, Vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 500–512. ISSN 2041-7772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab046

BUTTARELLI, G. Strange Bedfellows: Data Protection, Privacy and Competition Law. Competition Law International. London: International Bar Association, 2017, Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–30. ISSN 1817-5708.

BUTTS, C. The Microsoft Case 10 Years Later: Antitrust and New Leaning “New Economy” Firms. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. Chicago: Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, 2010, Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 275–291. ISSN 1549-8271.

CALVANO, E., POLO, M. Market Power, Competition and Innovation in Digital Markets: A Survey. SSRN Working Paper [online]. 2019 [cit. 22. 4. 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3523611

CAPRIO, G. Regulatory Capture: Why it Occurs, How to Minimize it. North Carolina Banking Institute. Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina School of Law, 2013, Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50.

CRAIG, P, BURCA, G. de. EU Law. 6. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. ISBN 978-0198714927.

CRANDALL, R. W., SIDAK, J. G., SINGER, H. J. The Empirical Case Against Asymmetrical Regulation of Broadband Internet Access. Berkley Technology Law Journal. Berkeley: UC Berkeley School of Law, 2002, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 953–987. ISSN 1086-3818.

CRÉMER, J., MONTJOYE, Y. A. de, SCHWEITZER, H. Competition Policy for the Digital Era. European Commision [online]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019, 102 p. [cit. 19. 4. 2023]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf.

DUCUING, C. Data as Infrastructure? A Study of Data Sharing Legal Regimes. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. Newburry Park: SAGE Publications Inc, 2020, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 124–142. ISSN 1783-5917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591719895390

EDWARDS, B. P. The Dark Side of Self-Regulation. University of Cincinnati Law Review. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati College of Law, 2017, Vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 573–622. ISSN 0009-6881.

EZRACHI, A, MODRALL, J. Rising to the Challenge - Competition Law and the Digital Economy. Competition Law International. London: International Bar Association, 2019, Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 117–126. ISSN 1817-5708.

EZRACHI, A., STUCKE, M. E. Virtual Competition: the Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0674545472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674973336

GRAEF, I. Data as Essential Facility. Tilburg: University of Tilburg, 2016.

GRAEF, I. Rethinking the Essential Facilities Doctrine for the EU Digital Economy. Revue juridique themis. Montréal: Éditions Thémis, 2019, Vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 33–72. ISSN 0556-7963.

GUGGENBERGER, N. Essential Platforms. Stanford Technology Law Review. Stanford: University of Stanford School of Law, 2021, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 237–343. ISSN 10984267.

HOROWITZ, R. B. The Irony of Regulatory Reform. The Deregulation of American Telecommunications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. ISBN 978-0195069990.

IBÁÑEZ COLOMO, P. EU Competition Law in the Regulated Network Industries. In: GALLOWAY, J. (ed.). Intersections of Antitrust: Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-1108841870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2747785

JUNGERMANN, S. The Digital Markets Act and the Applicability of National Competition Law: § 19a of the German Competition Act. Competition Law and Policy Debate. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 130–136. ISSN 25423967.

KERSCHNER, F. Wissenschaftliche Arbeitstechnik und Methodenlehre für Juristen. Vienna: Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, 2016. ISBN 978-3708910598.

KNIEPS, G. The Three Criteria Test, the Essential Facilities Doctrine, and the Theory of Monopolistic Bottlenecks. University of Freiburg Discussion Paper [online]. 2011, no. 132 [cit. 23. 5. 2023]. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/aluivr/132.html

KOLASKY, W. J. Network Effects: a Contrarian View. George Mason Law Review. Arlington: Antonin Scalia Law School, 1999, Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 577–616. ISSN 1068-3801.

KOPEL, M., LÖFFLER, C. Commitment, first-mover-, and second-mover advantage. Journal of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, Vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 143–166. ISSN 0931-8658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-008-0004-4

LEMLEY, M. A., McGOWAN, D. Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects. California Law Review. Berkeley: UC Berkeley School of Law, 1998, Vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 479–612. ISSN 0008-1221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3481119

MAIER-RIGAUD, F., MANCA, F., KOPPENFELS, U. von. Strategic Underinvestment and Gas Network Foreclosure - the ENI Case. EC Competition Policy Newsletter [online]. 2011, Vol. 1, pp. 18–23 [cit. 11. 5. 2023]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1903788.

MANDRESCU, D. The SSNIP Test and Zero-Pricing Strategies. European Competition and Regulatory Law Review. Berlin: Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, 2018, Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 244–257. ISSN 2510-3148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2018/4/4

McAFEE, P., MIALON, H. M., WILLIAMS, M. A. What is a Barrier to Entry. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings. Nashville: American Economic Association, 2004, Vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 461–465. ISSN 2574-0768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302235

MERLINO, P., FAELLA, G. Strategic Underinvestment as an Abuse of Dominance Under EU Competition Rules. World Competition. Alpen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law Online, 2013, Vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 513–539. ISSN 1875-8436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/WOCO2013040

MONTERO, J. J. Asymmetric Regulation for Competition in European Railways. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. Newburry Park: SAGE Publications Inc, 2019, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp.184–201. ISSN 1783-5917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591719861722

MOOSA, I. A. Good Regulation v Bad Regulation. Journal of Banking Regulation. London: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018, Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–63. ISSN 1745-6452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-017-0055-y

NEWMAN, J. M. Antitrust in Digital Markets. Vanderbilt Law Review. Nashville: Vanderbilt University, 2019, Vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1497–1562. ISSN 0042-2533.

NEWMAN, J. M. Antitrust in Zero-Price Markets: Applications. Washington University Law Review. St. Louis: Washington University School of Law, 2016, Vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 49–112. ISSN 2166-7993.

NEWMANN, J. M. Antitrust in Zero-Price Markets: Foundations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Philadelphia: Penn Carey Law, 2015, Vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 149–206. ISSN 0041-9907.

O, C. Le digital markets act: Un nouveau chapitre dans l’histoire du droit de la concurrence. Esprit. Paris: Editions esprit, 2021, no. 3, pp. 125–138. ISSN 0014-0759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/espri.2015.0125

OECD. The Role and Measurement of Quality in Competition Analysis. OECD [online]. 2013 [cit. 28. 4. 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/competition/Quality-in-competition-analysis-2013.pdf

ORBACH, B. What is Regulation. Yale Journal of Regulation. New Haven: Yale University School of Law, 2012, Vol. 30, pp. 1–10. ISSN 2376-5925.

PORTUESE, A. Precautionary Antitrust: The Changing Nature of Competition Law. Journal of Law, Economics, and Policy. Arlington: Antonin Scalia Law School, 2022, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 548–634. ISSN 1553-4367.

ROUCH, D. Self-Regulation is Dead: Long Live Self-Regulation. Law and Financial Markets Review. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor and Francis, 2010, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 102–122. ISSN 1752-1459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2010.11428106

SCHAWE, N. It’s all About Data: Time for a Data Access Regime for the Sharing Economy? Information Polity. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2020, Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 177–195, 186 p. ISSN 1570-1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190206

SCHLEUP, W. Einladung zur Rechtstheorie. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006. ISBN 978-3-8329-2493-5.

SCHOLZ, L. H. Big Data is not Big Oil: the Role of Analogy in Law of New Technologies. Tennessee Law Review. Knoxville: University of Tennessee College of Law, 2019, Vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 863–894. ISSN 0040-3288.

SOKOL, D. D., COMERFORD, R. Antitrust and Regulating Big Data. George Mason Law Review. Arlington: Antonin Scalia School of Law, 2016, Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1129–1162. ISSN 1068-3801.

VELJANOVSKI, C. Economic Approaches to Regulation. In: BALDWIN, R., CAVE, M., LODGE, M. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Regulation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0199655885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560219.003.0002

VEZZOSO, S. Happy Families are Alike: The EDPS Bridges Between Competition and Privacy. Market and Competition Law Review. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora, 2019, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–68. ISSN 2184-0008.

VILLAFRANCO, J. Self-Regulation in the Big Data and AI Space. Judge’s Journal. Washington DC: American Bar Association, 2020, Vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 32–35. ISSN 0047-2972.

WALLER, S. W. Antitrust and Social Networking. North Carolina Law Review. Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina School of Law, 2012, Vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1771–1806. ISSN 0029-2524.

WASASTJERNA, M. Competition, Data and Privacy in the Digital Economy: Towards a Privacy Dimension in Competition Policy. Alpen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020. ISBN 978-9403522203.

WASASTJERNA, M. European Union Competitive Policy for the Twenty-First Century Digital Economy. Columbia Journal of European Law. New York: University of Columbia School of Law, 2018, Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 527–540. ISSN 1076-6715.

YUN, J. M. Antitrust After Big Data. Criterion Journal on Innovation [online] 2019, no. 04 [cit. 17. 5. 2023]. Available at: https://www.criterioninnovation.com/articles/yun-antitrust-after-big-data.pdf

Metriky

0

Crossref logo

0


140

Views

97

PDF (English) views