ADRIAN, Melanie. Religious Freedom at Risk. The EU, French Schools, and Why the Veil was Banned

Andrea Hrebičková

Abstrakt

Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-21445-0.

Bibliografická citace

HREBIČKOVÁ, Andrea. ADRIAN, Melanie. Religious Freedom at Risk. The EU, French Schools, and Why the Veil was Banned. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi. [Online]. 2019, č. 1, s. 145-150. [cit. 2019-08-23]. Dostupné z: https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/11640

Klíčová slova

Svoboda vyznání; zahalování obličeje na veřejnosti; Francie.

Plný Text:

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

ADRIAN, Melanie. Religious Freedom at Risk. The EU, French Schools, and Why the Veil was Banned. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-21445-0.

BEAMAN, Lori G. Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case. Lisabon. Religious Diversity and Social Inclusion, 2016, roč. 4, č. 2.

GARRAUD, Jean Paul. Rapport sur le projet de loi (n°2520), interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l’espace public. Assemblée Nationale [online]. 2010 [cit. 8. 2. 2019]. Dostupné z: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/rapports/r2648.asp

INGH, Bhupinder. The Five Symbols of Sikhism. Sikh Formation, 2014, roč. 10, č. 1.

NIEUWENHUIS, Aernout. European Court of Human Rights: State and Religion, Schools and Scarves. An Analysis of the Margin of Appreciation as Used in the Case of Leyla Sahin v. Turkey, Decision of 29 June 2004, Application Number 44774/98. European Constitutional Law Review, Cambridge, 2005, roč. 1, č. 3. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019605004955

VILA, Maria Iglesias.Subsidiarity, margin of appreciation and international adjudication within a cooperative conception of human rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, roč. 15, č. 2.