Student reactions to online learning and online teaching tools used in a Business English course during the Covid-19 pandemic
Roč.12,č.2(2022)
In this paper, we are presenting the results of a quantitative survey on online learning carried out in the academic year 2021/22 among 185 first-year students at the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb. The classes were taught synchronously, with an emphasis on in-class student participation and regular submission of assignments. The online tools were part of the Google Classroom LMS.
The survey concerned students’ reactions to online learning in a Business English class over the course of 20 weeks. It consisted of two parts: one administered at the point of entry into the program, the other at the end of online teaching, when Covid-19 restrictions were lifted. The survey contained questions regarding 4 main areas: general information about students, general preferences about online learning, motivation and self-discipline questions, and opinions about online tools and activities.
Analysing the differences between the two polls, we were able to identify changes in students’ preferences and attitudes after the 20 weeks of online classes. The article reflects on these changes and their implications for motivation, students’ adjustment to online classes, student-student relationships versus student-instructor relationships and students’ expectations towards professors in online classes. The article also discusses students' reactions to specific online activities used at the university.
Although it is obvious that students greatly preferred in-person classes, and online activities failed to boost their motivation and self-discipline, the conclusions drawn from the two surveys can point towards a better understanding of the suitability of online teaching for younger university students.
Covid-19; engagement; LMS; motivation; online tasks; online teaching; quantitative survey
AGBEJULE, A., NDZIBAH, E., & LOTCHI, K. (2021). Motivation and barriers of online learners in the era of Covid-19. Vaasa: Vaasa University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/429234/978-952-5784-46-6_%282%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
AGENCY FOR SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION (2021). Studenti i pandemija: Kako smo (pre)živjeli? (eng. Students and the pandemic: How did we survive?) Zagreb: Agencija za znanost i visoko obrazovanje. Retrieved from https://www.azvo.hr/images/stories/novosti/Rezultati_istra%C5%BEivanja_Studenti_i_pandemija_-_Kako_smo_pre%C5%BEivjeli_lektorirano.pdf
AMADOR, J. A., & MEDERER, H. (2013). Migrating successful student engagement strategies online: Opportunities and challenges using jigsaw groups and problem-based learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 89–105. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=nrs_facpubs
BAKER, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1–30. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ904072
CHATURVEDI K, VISHWAKARMA DK, & SINGH N. (2021). COVID-19 and its impact on education, social life and mental health of students: A survey. Children and Youth Services Review 121, 1–6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105866
CHRISTOPHEL, D. M., & GORHAM, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44(4), 292–306
JOHNSON, D. (2017). The role of teachers in motivating students to learn. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 9(1), 46–49. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230415.pdf
JOHNSON, N., VELETSIANOS, G., & SEAMAN, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators' experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the Covid-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6–21. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1260365
KADIRESAN, V., JUNG, S., HAZRITA R., & FARRELL, R. (2021). Motivating factors influencing online learning among university students: A study of a private university in Malaysia. Journal of Social Science Studies, 8(2), 88–100. Retreived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355846269_Motivating_Factors_Influencing_Online_Learning_Among_University_Students_A_Study_of_a_Private_University_in_Malaysia
LIN, C. Z., ZHANG, Y., & ZHENG, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online learning: A structural equation modelling analysis. Computers & Education, 113, 75–85. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-roles-of-learning-strategies-and-motivation-in-Lin-Zhang/5694a88a27c82ef53c69ccd0130fdf5bbfc1106b
LOCKEE, B. B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics 4, 5–6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0
MARTIN, F., SUN, T., & WESTINE, D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
MUILENBURG, L. Y., & BERGE, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247662298_Student_Barriers_to_Online_Learning_A_Factor_Analytic_Study
NGUYEN, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tuan-Nguyen-186/publication/308171318_The_Effectiveness_of_Online_Learning_Beyond_No_Significant_Difference_and_Future_Horizons/links/57dc114608ae4e6f18469e8c/The-Effectiveness-of-Online-Learning-Beyond-No-Significant-Difference-and-Future-Horizons.pdf
O'SHEA, S., STONE, C., & DELAHUNTY, J. (2015). “I 'feel' like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36 (1), 41–58. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2828&context=sspapers
SLADOLJEV-AGEJEV, T. & KABALIN BORENIĆ, V. (2018). Analytic assessment of summaries in LSP classes: The challenges and benefits involved. Scripta Manent, 13(1), 45–64. Retrieved from https://scriptamanent.sdutsj.edus.si/ScriptaManent/article/view/263
STEWARD, C., BACHMAN, C., & JOHNSON, R. (2010) Students’ characteristics and motivation orientations for online and traditional degree programs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2). Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no2/stewart_0610.pdf
WANG, X., HEGDE, S., SON, C., KELLER, B., SMITH, A., & SASANGOHAR, F. (2020) Investigating mental health of US college students during the Covid-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9) doi: 10.2196/22817
ZAWACKI-RICHTER, O., BACKER, E., & VOGT S. (2009) Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21–50. Retrieved from https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/741/1461
Copyright © 2023 Boglarka Kiss Kulenović