Choice-of-court Agreements in the E-commerce International Contracts

Anabela Susana de Sousa Gonçalves

Abstract

The choice-of-court agreements are a common practice in the e commerce international contracts. In the European Union, the choice-of-courts agreements find their legal framework in Article 25 of Regulation No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 12 December 2012, on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I bis). The purpose of this paper is to analyse the current legal framework, in the European Union, of the jurisdiction agreements in international contracts concluded in e commerce, comparing it to the previous one, and taking into consideration the interpretative options of the European Union Court of Justice (ECJ).

Keywords

Brussels I bis Regulation, Choice-of-court Agreements, E-commerce Contracts, International Contracts

Full Text:

References

Show references Hide references

[1] Beraudo, J-P. (2013) Regards sur le nouveau règlement Bruxelles I sur la compétence judiciaire la reconnaissance et l´execution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale. Clunet, Vol. 3, pp. 741-763.

[2]European Commission (2010) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. COM 748 final, Brussels, pp. 1-105.

[3] European Commission (1999) Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Brussels, 14. 7. 1999, COM 348 final, pp. 1-17.

[4] Gaudemet-Tallon, H. (2002) Compétence et Exécution des Jugements en Europe, Règlement no. 44/2001. Conventions de Bruxelles et de Lugano, 3rd ed., Montchrestien, L.G.D.J., Paris.

[5] Gonçalves, A.S.S. (2014) a Revisão do Regulamento Bruxelas I Relativo à Competência Judiciária, ao Reconhecimento e à Execução de Decisões em Matéria Civil e Comercial’ in Estudos em Comemoração dos 20 Anos da Escola de Direito da Universidade do Minho. ed. Mário Monte et al., Coimbra Editora: Coimbra, pp. 39-59.

[6] Gonçalves, A.S.S. (2016) Cooperação Judiciária em Matéria Civil’ in Direito da União Europeia,Elementos de Direito e Política da União, ed. Alessandra Silveira, Mariana Canotilho, Pedro Madeira Froufe. Almedina: Coimbra, pp. 339-391.

[7] Hay, P. (2013) Notes on the European Union´s Brussels-I “Recast” Regulation. the European Legal Forum, Vol. 1, p. 3, pp. 1-8.

[8] Jenard, P. (1999)Report on the Convention, of 27 September 1968, regarding the judiciary competence and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters. JO C189, pp. 1- 65.

[9] Magnus, U.(2012) Prorogation of jurisdiction in Brussels I Regulation. ed. U. Magnus and P. Mankowski, Sellier European Law Publishers, Munich, pp. 436-514.

[10] Nuyts, A. (2013) La refonte du règlement Bruxelles I. RCDIP, Vol. 1, pp. 1-63.

[11] Pocar, F. (2009) Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed in Lugano on 30 October 2007 — Explanatory report. JO C, 319, pp. 1-56.

[12] Ratkovic, T. and Rotar, D.Z. (2013) Choice-of-Court Agreements Under the Brussels I Regulation (Recast). JPIL, Vol. 9 (2), pp. 245-268.

[13] Schlosser, P. (1990)Report on the Convention on the Association of the Kingdom of Denmark Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and to the Protocol on its interpretation by the Court of Justice. JO C 189, pp. 1- 81.

[14] Stone, P. (2008) EU Private International Law, Harmonization of Laws. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham – UK: Northampton – USA.

https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2017-1-4


Copyright (c) 2017 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology