Online Dispute Resolution to Resolve Consumer Disputes from the Perspective of European Union Law: Is the Potential of ODR Fully Used?
Traditional judicial mechanisms did not offer an adequate solution for cross-border electronic commerce disputes. Although there has been expected great potential in solving disputes online and the rise of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) use, the assumptions has not been confirmed yet. Only a few examples demonstrate the success stories of ODR, which is in big contrast to the continuous growth of electronic transactions and in general with the use of the online environment. The European Commission however understood the potential of ODR and it is trying to foster the use of it by adopting the ODR Regulation and the ADR Directive. Such legal framework has been developed to apply in consumer disputes arising out of sales or providing services between an EU consumer and an EU trader.
The ADR Directive sets out basic standards of ADR entities and processual rules under which it is possible to solve the dispute. Then under the ODR Regulation the complainant will be able to submit a complaint using the ODR platform. The complaint (and any related documentation) will be submitted to the ODR platform via an electronic form.
Yet it is necessary to assess the risks of above mentioned legal framework. One of the great concerns are connected with possible forum shopping while providers are registering as ADR entities. Experienced trader (unlike the consumer) is able to choose ADR provider, which is more likely to decide in his favour. Possible exclusion of online negotiation or even online tools in general is then further underlining possible. The paper will thus assess main legal aspects of ADR / ODR legal framework of European Union Law and will deal with main problematic parts of it.
 BOGDAN, Michael. The New EU Regulation on Online Resolution for Consumer Disputes. Masaryk University Journal for Law and Technology, 9 (1) 2015.
 CORTÉS, Pablo and Arno R. LODDER. Consumer Dispute Resolution Goes Online: Reflections on the Evolution of European Law for Out-of-Court Redress. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ). 21 (1) 2014.
 CORTÉS, Pablo. Enforcing EU Consumer Policy Through Different Layers: Combining the Judicial and the Out-of-Court Mechanisms [online]. University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 14-27. Available at: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2520487>.
 CORTÉS, Pablo. European Union’s initiatives on ADR and ODR. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 21 (8) 2015.
 CORTÉS, Pablo. The impact of EU law in the ADR landscape in Italy, Spain and the UK: time for change or missed opportunity? ERA Forum, 16 (2) 2015.
 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce'). In EUR-lex. Available from: <http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0031&qid=1445892573364&from=C>.
 Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR). In EUR-lex. Available from: <http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:165:0063:0079:EN:PDF>.
 ECODIR. [online]. Available at <http://www.ecodir.org/>.
 European Consumers Centres. [online]. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/solving_consumer_disputes/nonjudicial_
 HÖRNLE, Julia. Cross – border Internet Dispute Resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
 HÖRNLE, Julia. Encouraging Online Dispute Resolution in the EU and Beyond- Keeping Costs Low or Standards High? European Law Review, 38, 2013.
 KATSH, Ethan, Orna RABOVICH-EINY. Lessons from Online Dispute Resolution for Dispute Systems Design. In: Abdel Wahab, M., Katsh, M. and Rainey, D. (2012). Online dispute resolution. The Hague: Eleven International Pub.
 KATSH, Ethan. ODR: A Look At History. In: Abdel Wahab, M., Katsh, M. and Rainey, D. (2012). Online dispute resolution. The Hague: Eleven International Pub.
 KAUFMAN-KOHLER, Gabrielle, Thomas SCHULTZ. Online dispute resolution: challenges for contemporary justice. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.
 LESSIG, Lawrence. Code version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006. ISBN 9780465039146.
 LOUTOCKÝ, Pavel. Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers? Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 9 (1) 2015.
 MICKLITZ, Hans and Giovanni SARTOR. Assessing The Scope Of European Online Dispute Resolution Platform [online]. Directorate General For Internal Policies Policy Department A: Scientific And Economic Policy. Available at:
 Online dispute resolution for cross-border electronic commerce transactions. Online dispute resolution for cross-border electronic commerce transactions. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution). Twentysecond session. Vienna, 13-17 December 2010. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.105.
 PHILLIPE, Miréze. Where is everyone going with online dispute resolution (ODR)? International Business Law Journal, 2, 2002.
 Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR). In EUR-lex. Available from: <http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:165:0001:0012:EN:PDF>.
 RIEFA, Christine. Consumer Protection and Online Auction Platforms: Towards a Safer Legal Framework. Ashgate: London, 2015.
 ROGERS, Nancy H., Robert C. BARDONE, Frank E. A. SANDER, Craig A. MCEVEN. Designing Systems and Process for Managing disputes. Aspen Publishers: New York, 2013.
 Solving disputes online: New platform for consumers and traders. [online]. European Commission – press release [cit. 03-10-2016]. Available at: <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-297_en.htm>.
Copyright (c) 2016 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology