Standard Setting Organisations for the IoT: How To Ensure a Better Degree of Liability?

Vol.15,No.2(2021)

Francesca Gennari

https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2021-2-1

PDF
Abstract
This early stage research article aims to outline an issue that, though not strictly connected to the cyber-sphere, is most likely going to affect it. Standard Setting/Developing Organisations (SSOs/SDOs) are getting more and more important in the electronics manufacturing field and also in the IP field by setting de facto mandatory rules for products to be safer but, most importantly, more efficient. Standards create trust in complex objects such as IoT devices, that are increasingly more available, especially the ones for the house. It is worth mentioning that the standards these organisations envision are not comparable to legislation but carry a significant ‘moral’ weight (soft law). However, these organisations are private in character and work on a voluntary basis. The problem lies in the creation of the standard when the essentiality of a patented innovation has to be assessed. These processes rely on the self-certification of businesses that their invention is truly essential to the development of a certain standard, which has led to a proliferation of new Standard Essential Patents (S.E.P.s). But in this case, there are no means to ensure some form of liability of these organisations when defects and shortcomings arise. It is argued that unless some form of liability is created for these organisations, IoT objects will never gain the trust of final users.

Keywords:
IoT; Standards; Smart-House; Liability; SEP; SSOs; SDOs

Pages:
153–174
Author biography

Francesca Gennari

Mykolas Romeris University University of Bologna University of Turin Law Science and Technology International Joint Doctorate (LAST-JD-RIoE)

Law Science and Technology International Joint Doctorate. Rights of the Internet of Everything (LAST-JD-RIoE)

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie ITN EJD grant agreement No 814177.

PhD student with a focus on the liability of the Internet of Things 

References

List of References

[1] AI-HLEG (2019) Ethics Guidelines for a Trustworthy AI. [online] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[2] AIOTI, (2018) AIOTI [webpage]. Available from: https://aioti.eu/structure/collaborations/ [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[3] Ali, B. and Awad, A. (2018), Cyber and Physical Security Vulnerability Assessment for IoT-based smart homes. Sensors, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030817

[4] Bandhiopadyay, D. and Sen, J. (2011) Internet of Things: Applications and challenges in technology standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5

[5] Basedow, J. and Wurmnest W. (2005) Third-Party Liability of Classification societies. A Comparative Perspective, 1st ed. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer

[6] Bekkers, R. et al. (2020) Pilot Study for Essentiality Assessment of Standard Essential Patents [online] Bruxelles: JRC. Available from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC119894 [Accessed 07 January 2021]

[7] Biddle, C. (2017) No standard for standards: Understanding the ICT standards-development ecosystem. In: Jorge Contreras (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust, and Patents, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[8] Cerf, V., Khan R. (1974) A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1974.1092259

[9] Connected home over IP (2020) Connected home over IP [website]. Available from https://www.connectedhomeip.com/ [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[10] Contreras, J. (2019), Essentiality and Standards- Essential Patents. In: Jorge Contreras (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust, and Patents, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[11] Contreras, J. and Newman D. (2017) Alternative Dispute Resolution and FRAND Disputes. In: Jorge Contreras (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust, and Patents, 1st ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416723

[12] Council Directive (1993) 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Official Journal of the European Union (O J L 169) 12 July. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31993L0042&from=EN [Accessed 7 January 2021];

[13] Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products. Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 210 ) 7 August. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31985L0374&from=EN [ Accessed 7 January 2021]) 7 August. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31985L0374&from=EN [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[14] Delimatsis, P. (2019) International trade and technical standardization. In: Jorge Contreras (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law Further Intersections of Public and Private Law, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416785.001

[15] European Commission: (2020) COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, Making the most of the EU’s innovative potential An intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience, Brussels, (COM (2020) 760 final) 25 November. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0760&from=EN [Accessed 7 January 2020];

[16] European Commission: (2017) COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE Setting out the EU approach to Standard Essential Patents (COM/2017/0712 final) 29 November. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0712&from=EN [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[17] Farrel, J., et al. (2007) Standard Setting, Patents, Hold-Up. Antitrust Law Journal, 74

[18] Galetovic, A. and Haber S., (2017) The fallacies of patent-holdup theory. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhx006

[19] Kappos, D. (2019) OSS and SDO: Symbiotic Functions in the Innovation Equation. In: Jorge Contreras, The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416785.012

[20] Kurgonaitė, E., Treacy, P. and Bond, E. (2020) Looking Back to the Future—Selective SEP Licensing Through a Competition Law Lens?, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 11(3-4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpaa003

[21] Lagoni, N. (2007) The Liability of Classification Societies, 1st ed. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer

[22] Larroumet, Ch.(1998) La responsabilité du fait des produits défectueux après la loi du 19 mai 1998, in Recueil Dalloz (D.)., 33e cahier, chron.

[23] Mozilla Web of Things (2018) Mozilla Web Things [webpage] (Available from: https://iot.mozilla.org/about/ [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[24] Nativi, S. et al. (2020) IoT 2.0 and the INTERNET of TRANSFORMATION (Web of Things and Digital Twins) A multi-facets analysis, JRC, Available from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC120372/jrc120372_report_on_iot_%2815_sep_2020%29_ver_3.7.1.pdf

[25] Oma SpecWorks (2021) OMA SpecWorks [webpage] Available from: https://omaspecworks.org/ [Accessed 7 January 2020]

[26] one M2M (2017) one M2M [webpage] Available from: https://www.onem2m.org/ [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[27] Open Connectivity foundation (2021) Open Connectivity Foundation Organizational Structure [webpage] Available from: https://openconnectivity.org/foundation/organizational-structure/ [Accessed 7 Jan 2021]

[28] Picht, P. (2017) Unwired Planet v. Huawei: A Seminal SEP/FRAND decision from the UK. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 12 (10), October 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx152

[29] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union (O J L 119) 4 May. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&qid=1610038683923&from=EN [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[30] Regulation (EU) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, Official Journal of the European Union (O J L 145) 31 May. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001R1049&from=EN [Accessed 7 January 2021]

[31] Rott, P. (2019) Certification of Medical Devices: Lessons from the PIP Scandal. In: Peter Rott (ed.) Certification-Trust, Accountability and Liability, Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation,16, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02499-4

[32] Shapiro, C. (2005) Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools and Standard-Setting. Innovation policy and the Economy, 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/ipe.1.25056143

[33] Tovo, C. (2018) Judicial Review of Harmonized Standards: Changing the Paradigms of Legality and Legitimacy of Private Rulemaking under EU law Common Market Law Review, 55

[34] Ulfbeck, V. and Møllmann, A. (2019) Public Function Liability of Classification Societies In: In: Peter Rott (ed.) Certification-Trust, Accountability and Liability, Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation,16, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02499-4_10

[35] Verbruggen, P. (2019) Good Governance of Private Standardization and the Role of Tort Law. European Private Law Review, 27(2)

[36] Viney, G. (1998), L’introduction en droit français de la directive européenne du 25 juillet 1985 relative à la responsabilité de produits défectueux, in D., 31e cahier, chron. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1246-7391(98)80288-1

[37] Wallerman, A. (2018), Pie in the sky when you die? Civil liability of notified bodies under the Medical Devices Directive: Schmitt. Common Market Law Review, 55

[38] Weber, R. (2017) Liability in the Internet of Things. Journal of Consumer and Market Law, 6(5)

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0

632

Views

478

PDF views

Copyright © 2021 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology

PDF